We're going to DIY a portable table for CE. We won't have a dedicated space
for it, so the table and ground plane will need to me ... portable.1. How big
must the test table be for normal FCC class B (CISPR 16, I think) conducted
emissions, from 0.15 - 30 MHz?Same question for the ground
<00f5a03f18eb-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:19:10 +
It reads like there are two limits, peak and QP. Go over either one and by
how many and by how much over, does not
and graph
shows that.
Now to get lab to show a continuous graph for radiated emissions might be a
problem.
Easier to get a new lab !
Some cheap labs will fake a continuous plot by connecting the highest dots.
Run from them !
Long details on the experience that I got.
On Friday, April 5, 2024
Mark
From: Larry K. Stillings
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 3:46 PM
To: Stultz, Mark ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
| |
You don't often get email fromla...@complianceworldwide.com.Learn why this is
important
| |
CAUTION: This
phase LISNs for our unit? I could see 3 (one for the neutral) but
I'm not so savvy on EMC test equipment. thanks, Colorado Brian From: Brian
Gregory
Reply-To: Brian Gregory
Date: Friday, April 5, 2024 at 5:01 PM
To:
Subject: [PSES] Conducted emissions for Split-phase 120/240V need
Long ago, the company had the budget, so we bought single phase for each line.
Thinking that we did not want any cross talk interference, which we had already
experienced in the real world.
Then we also had built the various configurations for supply power that we
used.
In essence measuring
It may be worth noting at any LISN using magnetic cores/elements in the
50uH bit, must be calibrated at the maximum rated current to verify that
saturation isn't a problem.
On 4/5/2024 9:56 PM, Brent DeWitt wrote:
In my opinion, all of this is rather simple. Any LISN, ANSI or CISPR,
In my opinion, all of this is rather simple. Any LISN, ANSI or CISPR,
references the noise to "ground". Any conductor not being measured
should be terminated in 50 ohms. Whatever network used needs to make
that so. Take your pick.
On 4/5/2024 9:43 PM, T.Sato wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:01:29 GMT,
Brian Gregory wrote:
> Hello and Happy Friday, I've got a sales guy telling me our 120/240V EUT
> needs two pair of single-phase LISNs for our CE test bench.That's only
> slightly cheaper than a 3-phase unit at > 50A, but very bulky. Can someone
> remind me
t? I
> could see 3 (one for the neutral) but I'm not so savvy on EMC test equipment.
>
> thanks,
>
> Colorado Brian
> From: Brian Gregory <mailto:brian_greg...@netzero.net>>
> Reply-To: Brian Gregory <mailto:brian_greg...@netzero.net>>
> Date: Frida
so savvy on EMC test equipment.
thanks,
Colorado Brian
From: Brian Gregory
Reply-To: Brian Gregory
Date: Friday, April 5, 2024 at 5:01 PM
To:
Subject: [PSES] Conducted emissions for Split-phase 120/240V needs three-phase
LISN?
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineer
This gets a bit more complicated for FCC regulations on emissions above
1 GHz, where the prescribed detector is an average detector (at 1 MHz
RBW) and the peak limit is defined as 20 dB above that.
On 4/5/2024 7:19 PM, Brent DeWitt wrote:
That is what I expected you meant, but a bit confusing
That is what I expected you meant, but a bit confusing based on the
original topic. You are certainly correct with respect to conducted
emissions!
On 4/5/2024 7:14 PM, rmm.priv...@gmail.com wrote:
I was thinking conducted emissions in the context of average detectors.
*From:*Brent DeWitt
I was thinking conducted emissions in the context of average detectors.
From: Brent DeWitt
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 3:48 PM
To: rmm.priv...@gmail.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
Could you clarify when you would choose
Could you clarify when you would choose to use an average detector for
radiated emissions between 30 and 1000 MHz?
On 4/5/2024 6:39 PM, Ralph McDiarmid wrote:
I’m having trouble with /“Of those disturbances above (L-20dB), where
L is the limit level in logarithmic units, the disturbance
ultz, Mark <0f79f2e10e47-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 12:33 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
Hello PSES brain trust,
When doing radiated emissions measurements, how many frequencies should be
quasi-pea
Hello and Happy Friday, I've got a sales guy telling me our 120/240V EUT needs
two pair of single-phase LISNs for our CE test bench.That's only slightly
cheaper than a 3-phase unit at > 50A, but very bulky. Can someone remind me why
I'd need 4, 50A single-phase LISNs for our unit? I could see
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 3:46 PM
To: Stultz, Mark ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
You don't often get email from
la...@complianceworldwide.com<mailto:la...@complianceworldwide.com>. Learn why
this is important<https
nor endorsed by it.
From: Stultz, Mark
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2024 3:33 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
Hello PSES brain trust,
When doing radiated emissions measurements, how many frequencies should be
quasi-peaked?
CISPR 16-2-3 clause
ril 05, 2024 3:33 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
Hello PSES brain trust,
When doing radiated emissions measurements, how many frequencies should be
quasi-peaked?
CISPR 16-2-3 clause 6.4.9 states:
"Of those disturbances above (L-20d
Hello PSES brain trust,
When doing radiated emissions measurements, how many frequencies should be
quasi-peaked?
CISPR 16-2-3 clause 6.4.9 states:
"Of those disturbances above (L-20dB), where L is the limit level in
logarithmic units, the disturbance levels and the frequencies of at
oodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 11:29 AM
To: Larry K. Stillings ;
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] ANSI 63.10 2020 Clause 7.6.3 Pulsed Emissions
Microvolts/m requires 20*log( ), like anything based on voltage or current.
Your example of a transmitter is based on power.
On 2024
, however before I did that I
wanted to get some help here.
In the 2020 edition of the ANSI 63.10 standard they have added a
calculation example page for pulsed emissions in Clause 7.6.3.
In a nutshell the example shows a duty cycle of ~36% (25 mS on time /
70 mS off time). The readings
Hello All,
Maybe this is not the correct forum and I should put in an inquiry into the
ANSI C63.10 committee directly, however before I did that I wanted to get some
help here.
In the 2020 edition of the ANSI 63.10 standard they have added a calculation
example page for pulsed emissions
: [PSES] Metallic table for conducted emissions?
I agree with your interpretation of the enquiry. I think it is necessary to
watch out for the legs. if they are frames (or some more complex construction)
rather than single pillars, becoming resonant loops at some frequencies. I
suppose single
.
--
Ken Javor
(256) 650-5261
*From: *Ken Wyatt
*Reply-To: *Ken Wyatt
*Date: *Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 3:53 PM
*To: *
*Subject: *Re: [PSES] Metallic table for conducted emissions?
Hi Brian,
The answer is yes and no. Yes, you can get a general idea, but no, you
really need a ground plane
) 650-5261
From: Ken Wyatt
Reply-To: Ken Wyatt
Date: Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 3:53 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] Metallic table for conducted emissions?
Hi Brian,
The answer is yes and no. Yes, you can get a general idea, but no, you really
need a ground plane to conduct the CM
Hello fellow experts, we're looking to build a conducted emission
pre-compliance test station to FCC Part 15 Subpart B requirements (residential
applications).Is a non-metallic table a necessity for reasonable accuracy? We
have a number of lab benches with wood tops and metal legs that would
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
> relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
> given nor endorsed by it.
>
>
>
> *From:* Paolo Roncone
> *Sent:* Wednesda
From: Paolo Roncone
Reply-To: Paolo Roncone
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:05:41 +0100
To:
Subject: [PSES] Antenna tilting or boresigjting for radiated emissions
Hi all,
Is there an FCC / ANSI requirement, or maybe just recommendation, for
antenna tilting or boresighting wrt radiated emissions
of operation determined in the
exploratory testing to
produce the emission that has the highest amplitude relative to the limit.
Place the measurement antenna
away from each area of the EUT determined to be a source of emissions at the
specified measurement
distance, while keeping the measurement
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
From: Paolo Roncone
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 1:06 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Antenna tilting or boresigjting for radiated emissions
Hi all,
Is there an FCC / ANSI requirement, or maybe just recommendation, for a
Hi all,
Is there an FCC / ANSI requirement, or maybe just recommendation, for
antenna tilting or boresighting wrt radiated emissions in a semi-anechoic
chamber ?
If yes, can you please get me the reference section in FCC Part15 or ANSI
std or somewhere else?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Paolo
i 2022 11:42
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: [PSES] Origin of steps in radiated emissions limit lines
Hello all,
A question I get asked by our customers, and that I've not found a satisfactory
answer to, is why are there steps in the limit lines for radiated emissions?
This kind of
On Tue, 3 May 2022 10:42:23 +0100,
"James Pawson (U3C)" wrote:
> A question I get asked by our customers, and that I've not found a
> satisfactory answer to, is why are there steps in the limit lines for
> radiated emissions?
>
> This kind of leads to the question
tisfactory answer to, is why are there steps in the limit lines for
> radiated emissions?
>
>
>
> This kind of leads to the question of how do limit lines get specified in
> the first place? For emissions and immunity.
>
>
>
> I know that it relates to protection
Hello all,
A question I get asked by our customers, and that I've not found a
satisfactory answer to, is why are there steps in the limit lines for
radiated emissions?
This kind of leads to the question of how do limit lines get specified in
the first place? For emissions and immunity
//apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/forms/FTSSearchResultPage.cfm?id=44637=P
>
>
>
> § 15.33(a) gives you an upper frequency of 12.5 GHz for part 15B “emc”
> emissions
>
> § 15.33(b) gives you an upper frequency of 25 GHz for part 15C “radio
> spurious” emissions
>
>
>
> Best reg
Paolo
I would recommend FCC KDB 996369 D04 Module Integration Guide V02
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/forms/FTSSearchResultPage.cfm?id=44637=P
§ 15.33(a) gives you an upper frequency of 12.5 GHz for part 15B “emc” emissions
§ 15.33(b) gives you an upper frequency of 25 GHz for part 15C “radio
Hi all,
an EUT with built-in Bluetooth 2.4 GHz module must be tested - as any
electrical/electronic equipment sold in the USAm to FCC requirements for
EMI.
Questions:
1. What is the frequency range of EMI radiated emissions for the EUT in
question?
According to § 15.33 of Part 15:
https
. These
are both easily achievable with typical FET switches.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Ken Javor
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:43:08 -0600
To:
Conversation: [PSES] unusual conducted emissions question
Subject: Re: [PSES] unusual conducted emissions question
Well of course the switching device
, or whatever the
nominal bus potential is, the switching device alternately connects that
potential to the load, or disconnects it. The load then draws a transient
current until it reaches steady-state potential, whereupon it generates the
emissions typically covered by frequency domain requirements
(U3C) <
ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk> wrote:
> This message originated outside of DISH and was sent by:
> owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
>
> Hi Doug,
>
>
>
> Thinking aloud here:
>
>
>
> This strikes me as more of a flicker/inrush current kind of
Hi Doug,
Thinking aloud here:
This strikes me as more of a flicker/inrush current kind of problem, whereas
conducted emissions would be more of a steady state problem.
In the AC mains flicker test it's a "stiff" supply and a series impedance
over which to measure the inru
Hi Doug,
Consider using a voltage probe instead of a LISN.
Best Regards,
Mike
From: doug emcesd.com
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2021 8:02 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] unusual conducted emissions question
There is a device between us and the electrical system
From: Ken Javor
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 7:55:05 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] unusual conducted emissions question
The purpose of a LISN when testing for vehicular use is to simulate the common
impedance between battery and fuse block.
There should be no power
.
Doug Smith
Sent from my iPhone
IPhone: 408-858-4528
Office: 702-570-6108
Email: d...@dsmith.org
Website: http://dsmith.org
From: Ken Javor
Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 7:55:05 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] unusual conducted emissions
the power cycling device goes between the LISN output and the
switched load.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Douglas Smith
Reply-To: Douglas Smith
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:16:51 +
To:
Subject: [PSES] unusual conducted emissions question
Hi All,
I have come across an unusual
Hi All,
I have come across an unusual conducted emissions issue with a device where the
impedance stabilization network for automotive testing itself causes a problem
that will not let a class of equipment ever pass because of the network not the
equipment itself.
In this case, the power
t;From: Agar, Philip (Leonardo, UK) <165a27c6a118-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
>Sent: 12 October 2021 15:00
>To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: [PSES] Non-isolated Solar Invertor EMC emissions
>
*snip*
>I then set
>to introduce Schaffner FN2010-30-08 filters into both th
.
Question:
Is it widely recognised that this type of invertor design is associated with
high levels of EMC emissions? If so, on what basis might EMC compliance be
claimed for such a unit? Perhaps there are specialist EMC filters targeted at
this kind of invertor design.
Phil
EMC Engineer
Hi everyone:
It seems that there are lots of dimmable 24V LED power supplies out there,
but the first 3 or 4 that we have looked at do not pass CE for various
loading conditions. These are not simple 24V DC output supplies, these also
have a two-terminal input port to accept a 0-10V analog or PWM
12:21 PM, Brian Kunde wrote:
I am working on the first Industrial Machine of my career so I could
use some advice and clarification regarding the requirements for FCC
emissions.
I have been told by many that in North America, Industrial Equipment
does not have to be tested, verified, or
ng Laboratory, LLC. and is intended for the exclusive use of the
recipient(s) named above.
From: André Videira
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 10:13 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FCC Emissions on Industrial Equipment
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of Element Materi
The exemption for industrial equipment under 15.103
applies ONLY to test equipment. Many, if not all, Industrial devices do have
technical limits in Part 18. They also may have general emissions limits
outside the actual operating frequencies of the device in that rule part.
While
e specific technical standards in this part.
Basically, the procedure for the equipment authorizations is verifying that the
device is within limits for unintentionally radiating unwanted emissions as
good quality engineering.
Refer also to FCC KDB 772105
D01<https://apps.fcc.gov/kdb/GetAttac
r so I could use
> some advice and clarification regarding the requirements for FCC emissions.
>
> I have been told by many that in North America, Industrial Equipment does
> not have to be tested, verified, or anything for FCC by the manufacturer of
> the equipment. Is t
-6-4.
Mike
> On 01/12/2021 11:21 AM Brian Kunde wrote:
>
>
> I am working on the first Industrial Machine of my career so I could use
> some advice and clarification regarding the requirements for FCC emissions.
>
> I have been told by many
I am working on the first Industrial Machine of my career so I could use
some advice and clarification regarding the requirements for FCC emissions.
I have been told by many that in North America, Industrial Equipment does
not have to be tested, verified, or anything for FCC by the manufacturer
Park, MN 55445, United States
O +1 612 638 5136 ext. 4003
david.schae...@element.com
www.element.com
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 7:40 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EN 50498:2010 Emissions measurement distance
All
I couldn't see the measurement distance specified in this standard for
aftermarket electronic equipment in vehicles - have I missed it, or do you use
3m as per the emissions standards listed in the bibliography?
Best regards
Charlie
Charlie Blackham
Sulis Consultants Ltd
Mead House
The international version of RTCA/DO-160 section 21 comes to mind, but that
is only for aircraft use.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Charlie Blackham
Reply-To: Charlie Blackham
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 16:12:57 +
To:
Subject: [PSES] Commercial Standards with strict EMC emissions
All
I'm looking at various end applications for a particular radio module and am
drawing up a list of EMC emissions standards applicable to the end product that
have radiated emissions limits that are more stringent than those in FCC
47CFR15B or EN 55032 Class B in the range 30 - 6000 MHz.
So
RG
Subject: RE: [PSES] CISPR 25 Limits for conducted disturbances - guidance for
selecting emissions class
Maybe some document like this from Ford would help?
https://www.elect-spec.com/download/EMC_CS_2009rev1.pdf
Similar from Jaguar Land Rover?
http://emc.jaguarlandrover.com.edg
ing By Sea, West
Sussex, BN12 4QY.
From: James Pawson (U3C)
Sent: 05 February 2020 12:09
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CISPR 25 Limits for conducted disturbances - guidance for
selecting emissions class
Hello experts,
Can anyone point me towards any guidance for selecting the a
Hello experts,
Can anyone point me towards any guidance for selecting the appropriate CISPR
25 emissions Class (1-5) based on installation of equipment within a
vehicle? The standard states "The level class to be used (as a function of
the frequency band) shall be agreed upon be
From: micha...@acbcert.com
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 11:24 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Question on 15.407 spurious emissions testing method
enforcement
Hi Charles, I hope you are well.
When performing your 15.109 emissions (part 15 subpart B) on the digital
Thank for comment Michael!
Shame not seeing you at the TCBC conference. Perhaps next year?
From: micha...@acbcert.com
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 2:24 AM
To: Grasso, Charles ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Question on 15.407 spurious emissions testing method
enforcement
Hi Charles, I hope you are well.
When performing your 15.109 emissions (part 15 subpart B) on the digital
device part of the product, you should have the transmitter part active
(powered) but it does not need to be transmitting. Receiver mode would be
nice, or active scanning, or something
EMC Gurus,
According to KDB789033 (Note3) : After January 01, 2019 all emissions are
required to meet the limits as specified in the rules and it will not be
sufficient to
show compliance to the limits specified in Section 15.209. [This means that,
for Bands 1, 2a, and 2c, there is ONLY
ust 15, 2019 9:35 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Frequency range for conducted emissions
radiated emissions go a bit lower.
§15.209 Radiated emission limits; general requirements.
(a) Except as provided elsewhere in this subpart, the emissions from an
intentional ra
radiated emissions go a bit lower.
§15.209 Radiated emission limits; general requirements.
(a) Except as provided elsewhere in this subpart, the emissions from an
intentional radiator shall not exceed the field strength levels specified in
the following table:
| Frequency (MHz) | Field
I'd like to thank all who chimed in with their thoughts. And yes, I am
well aware of how standards get put together and appreciate the hard work
of those who give them life. In no way I wanted to criticize their work, I
was just seeking confirmation that I'm not (that) crazy.
I particularly
-08-12 22:21, Brent DeWitt wrote:
For the upper end; conducted measurements end where radiated emissions
start. Back in the mists of time someone decided that a ten meter
wavelength was something that could radiated fairly efficiently from
cables, so radiated emissions sounded like more
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* [PSES] Frequency range for conducted emissions
Hello group,
Does anyone know why the conducted emissions for ITE products starts
at 150KHz and end at 30MHz? Why not start at 120KHz or 190KHz. Why
finish at 30 and not 40MHz?
Thank you
Peter
frequency range. The 5 uH LISN is 5 at 150 kHz, and doesn¹t
get close to 50 until above 2 MHz.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Brent DeWitt
Reply-To: Brent DeWitt
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:21:45 -0400
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] Frequency range for conducted emissions
For the upper
in disguise.²
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: John Allen <09cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Reply-To: John Allen
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:09:55 +0100
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] Frequency range for conducted emissions
An ³easy one² for us ³oldies² but I¹m sure that John Wo
For the upper end; conducted measurements end where radiated emissions
start. Back in the mists of time someone decided that a ten meter
wavelength was something that could radiated fairly efficiently from
cables, so radiated emissions sounded like more of a risk to
telecommunications
:06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: 12 August 2019 21:37
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Frequency range for conducted emissions
Hello group,
Does anyone know why the conducted emissions for ITE products starts at 150KHz
and end at 30MHz? Why not start at 120KHz
Hello group,
Does anyone know why the conducted emissions for ITE products starts at 150KHz
and end at 30MHz? Why not start at 120KHz or 190KHz. Why finish at 30 and not
40MHz?
Thank youPeter#yiv9843054295 -- filtered {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2
4;}#yiv9843054295 filtered {font-family:Calibri
: [PSES] Conducted emissions AMN/AAN layout
I endorse paragraph 2 below. We in GB are lucky that participation in
standards work in BSI is free. (But it doesn't stop us complaining about the
cost of BSI standards - a doozy I found yesterday is £200 for six pages, of
which three are the actual text
I endorse paragraph 2 below. We in GB are lucky that participation in
standards work in BSI is free. (But it doesn't stop us complaining about
the cost of BSI standards - a doozy I found yesterday is £200 for six
pages, of which three are the actual text.)
Standards work is to a significant
CISPR32 (2012) conducted emissions tests. Looking
at Table D.1 and figure D.2, I am trying to figure out where to place
our two AMNs and single AAN to meet all of the distance and length
requirements.
Our setups will look very much like figure D.2, but shape and number
of AE will vary (naturally
will perform our CISPR32 (2012) conducted emissions tests. Looking
at Table D.1 and figure D.2, I am trying to figure out where to place
our two AMNs and single AAN to meet all of the distance and length
requirements.
Our setups will look very much like figure D.2, but shape and number
of AE
My friends,
I am preparing to drill new threaded holes in our chamber floor, where we
will perform our CISPR32 (2012) conducted emissions tests. Looking at
Table D.1 and figure D.2, I am trying to figure out where to place our two
AMNs and single AAN to meet all of the distance and length
: Friday, June 28, 2019 8:24 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Observation Period during Flicker Emissions Test
Reference IEC/EN 61000-3-3:2013 section 6.5 regarding Observation Period. The
Electrical Equipment (EE) under test is NOT listed in Annex A.
We are trying to make sure we
The real question is 'How is the product used?' If running for one
cycle and then in stand-by for the rest of 2 hours is 'normal
operation', then test it that way. But if it's usually run more or less
continually, being switched back on when it stops, then it isn't correct
to allow it to run
I have a maxim, do the EMC Test according to the standard, if it passed, do not
test again.
Tim Foo
From: Brian Kunde
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Observation Period during Flicker Emissions Test
Reference IEC/EN 61000-3-3:2013 section 6.5
Reference IEC/EN 61000-3-3:2013 section 6.5 regarding Observation Period.
The Electrical Equipment (EE) under test is NOT listed in Annex A.
We are trying to make sure we are testing a product correctly. Your help
would be greatly appreciated.
The EE has a cycle time of about 15 to 20 minutes.
Hi Ian,
Simply and quickly, no, FCC does not regulate emissions on
telecommunications ports.
They want you to perform 120 VAC, 60 Hz conducted emissions on the AC
side of the POE Injector to show it complies when connected to mains.
Same scenario for the 12 V DC port, they want
Dear Colleagues.
We have a product that can be powered from a PoE source as well as 12V DC.
For the EU EMC regulations, we measure the conducted rf emissions from the
ethernet port when supplied with PoE power. EN 55032 Table A.11
Is the same test required when declaring compliance with the FCC
Just google download mil std 461G. Several options should pop up.
Derek.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 8, 2019, at 6:19 AM, T.Sato wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 11:43:30 +,
> John Woodgate wrote:
>
>> CISPR standards do not cover the above, but I suppose military and
>> aviation
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 11:43:30 +,
John Woodgate wrote:
> CISPR standards do not cover the above, but I suppose military and
> aviation standards may do. Is there anything available free of
> charge?
MIL-STD-461 RE101 covers 30 Hz to 100 kHz magnetic field measurement
using 13.3 cm loop at
CISPR standards do not cover the above, but I suppose military and
aviation standards may do. Is there anything available free of charge?
--
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
using a loop antenna that the problem Cortland
describes is encountered.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Cortland Richmond
Reply-To: Cortland Richmond
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:52:57 -0500
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] CISPR11 Rad Magnetic Field Emissions Limits
The bottom line here
, it
would have to be 10*log(yi/mi), because 'money is power'.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-01-17 22:17, Ken Javor wrote:
Re: [PSES] CISPR11 Rad Magnetic Field Emissions Limits It would be
completely correct
:17, Ken Javor wrote:
Re: [PSES] CISPR11 Rad Magnetic Field Emissions Limits It would be
completely correct to say that the 51.5 dB factor is dB above one ohm,
which is the difference in magnetic and electric field units.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
Rad Magnetic Field Emissions Limits
To fill in, that 51.5 dB = 375.84 numerically and comes from the impedance
of free space, 120*¼ = 376.99 ohms. which is actually 51.5266 expressed in
'decibels'. Actually, expressing an impedance in 'decibels' is a illegal
operation 'but it works, so why
OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-01-17 21:57, Ken Javor wrote:
Re: [PSES] CISPR11 Rad Magnetic Field Emissions Limits You are making
too much of it. If the limit is in terms of dBuA/m, you use the loop
magnetic field antenna factor
2019 21:27:15 +
To:
Conversation: CISPR11 Rad Magnetic Field Emissions Limits
Subject: [PSES] CISPR11 Rad Magnetic Field Emissions Limits
Reference CISPR11/EN55011:2016 version.
If you are an expert at the Radiated Emissions test from 150Khz -30Mhz for
Class A Group 2 equipment, I could really use your he
1 - 100 of 1244 matches
Mail list logo
