In message
de87437fe365cb458c265ea3d73b6f1d02673...@xbc-mail1.xantrex.com, dated
Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com writes:
It seems I am interpreting it correctly, and some other mfr's and
competent bodies are not. None of us is perfect, but careful reading
does give you
testing per EN60529
This has to do with the IP 3X, and 4X ratings and tests.
The testing is by way of 2.5mm rod or 1.0mm wire probes, which seems
quite straight forward at first. But the probes are not meant to be
used the way I'm used to. It's not about whether they can touch
anything, it's about
-p...@ieee.org
Subject: IP testing per EN60529
This has to do with the IP 3X, and 4X ratings and tests.
The testing is by way of 2.5mm rod or 1.0mm wire probes, which seems
quite straight forward at first. But the probes are not meant to be
used the way I'm used to. It's not about whether
In message p06240812c226d8d0cad0@[192.168.1.60], dated Wed, 21 Mar
2007, Nick Williams nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk writes:
It is wrong to think of the results of testing to EN 60529 in terms of
'pass' or 'fail'. It is there to assign a code number to a given
enclosure and whether this is
I agree with Ted that you are correct, Jim. The IP code is widely
misunderstood as being the same as a pass/fail requirement in one of
the product safety standards. In fact it is not, it is standardised
method of making measurements of the performance of a product with
regard to ingress
cc
Subject
03/20/2007 07:07 IP testing per EN60529
PM
This has to do with the IP 3X, and 4X ratings and tests.
The testing is by way of 2.5mm rod or 1.0mm wire probes, which seems
quite straight forward at first. But the probes are not meant to be
used the way I'm used to. It's not about whether they can touch
anything, it's about whether they
7 matches
Mail list logo
