oe6ymq1we9ql2rkes8y0002c...@hotmail.com, Tania Grant
taniagr...@msn.com inimitably wrote:
However, I believe that standards should use all three precepts as
necessary rather than an ascension order as you state.
You have introduced a higher level of insight. What is *specified* is
not
...@msn.com
- Original Message -
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 9:13 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: You won't believe this ... Well, maybe you will.
002501c0f905$794dabe0$3e3e3...@corp.auspex.com, Doug McKean
dmck...@corp.auspex.com inimitably wrote:
1
, June 19, 2001 11:19 PM
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: You won't believe this ... Well, maybe you will.
Dear all,
In bringing a product through safety and having many
issues, it might surprise you that after all was said and
done, the entire safety approval reduced to a simple
cfm
002c01c0f914$4b1344b0$3e3e3...@corp.auspex.com, Doug McKean
dmck...@corp.auspex.com inimitably wrote:
The fan itself is more of an issue of having a baseline with
which to allow alternates to be used. If I can prove by
way of fan company documenation that the fan is x cfm,
then that's the
002501c0f905$794dabe0$3e3e3...@corp.auspex.com, Doug McKean
dmck...@corp.auspex.com inimitably wrote:
1. Have any you ever run into something
like this before?
2. If you have, what did you do about it?
I would say that a safety standard that specifies a cfm rating for a fan
is a
.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Doug McKean [mailto:dmck...@corp.auspex.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:19 PM
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: You won't believe this ... Well, maybe you will.
Dear all,
In bringing a product through safety and having many
issues
Discussion Group
Subject: Re: You won't believe this ... Well, maybe you will.
Rich Nute wrote:
Hi Doug:
The issue for me is: What is the safety requirement
that requires cfm (I presume a minimum cfm)?
The issue is a Hazardous Energy ( 240va).
The power output that feeds the board
Rich Nute wrote:
Hi Doug:
The issue for me is: What is the safety requirement
that requires cfm (I presume a minimum cfm)?
The issue is a Hazardous Energy ( 240va).
The power output that feeds the board is above
the limit.
The fan itself is more of an issue of having a baseline
Hi Doug:
done, the entire safety approval reduced to a simple
cfm rating fan for a chip both on the secondary
side of the power supply.
The issue for me is: What is the safety requirement
that requires cfm (I presume a minimum cfm)?
Reading between the lines...
The fan
Dear all,
In bringing a product through safety and having many
issues, it might surprise you that after all was said and
done, the entire safety approval reduced to a simple
cfm rating fan for a chip both on the secondary
side of the power supply.
For some obvious reasons of which I hope
10 matches
Mail list logo
