468 1746 (USA area code)
Mobile phone: (+44) 7939 880829 (UK area code)
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 19 September 2016 08:32
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
Who decides if a given technology makes &
2016 8:00 AM
To: John Woodgate ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
I'm not sure whether or not you're being serious, but I'll bite - It's got
nothing to do with "suppressing stuff"
Excerpt the Directive &quo
37
To: Charlie Blackham; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
As I said, nodded through. This 'efficient use' provision is carte blanche for
suppression of anything the government doesn't like.
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO
r by telephone or by e-mail and
delete the material from any computer.
Thank you for your co-operation.
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Sunday 18 September 2016 22:37
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
As I said, no
eigh England
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 9:04 PM
To: John Woodgate ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
John
Receiver Sensitivity is an Article 3.2 R
jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 18 September 2016 20:45
To: Charlie Blackham; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
The draft specifies receiver sensitivity, which is surely not an EMC matter and
severely restricts manufacturers' freedom of design and offering of a
o: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
David
The other thing to add is that this is within scope of the Radio Equipment
Directive, which must be applied from 13th June 2017, so you may wish to
look at the receiver performance requirements in Draft ETSI EN 303
345%5C01.01.01_20%5Cen_303345v010101a.pdf>
Regards
Charlie
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 18 September 2016 08:58
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032
EN 55032 is the successor of EN 55013, but 55013 is still valid at p
esting to EN 55013 or EN 55032
Hi
Would an FM receiver used in a motorcycle helmet be subject to testing under
EN 55013 or EN 55032?
Thanks in advance for any opinions.
Regards,
David Shidlowsky | Technical Reviewer
Address 1 Bat-Sheva St. LOD 7120101 Israel
Tel 972-8-9186113 Fax 972-8-915310
Hi
Would an FM receiver used in a motorcycle helmet be subject to testing under EN
55013 or EN 55032?
Thanks in advance for any opinions.
Regards,
David Shidlowsky | Technical Reviewer
Address 1 Bat-Sheva St. LOD 7120101 Israel
Tel 972-8-9186113 Fax 972-8-9153101
Mail :
dav...@itlglobal.org
10 matches
Mail list logo