Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-19 Thread Michael Derby
468 1746 (USA area code) Mobile phone: (+44) 7939 880829 (UK area code) From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: 19 September 2016 08:32 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 Who decides if a given technology makes &

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-19 Thread John Woodgate
2016 8:00 AM To: John Woodgate ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 I'm not sure whether or not you're being serious, but I'll bite - It's got nothing to do with "suppressing stuff" Excerpt the Directive &quo

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-19 Thread Charlie Blackham
37 To: Charlie Blackham; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 As I said, nodded through. This 'efficient use' provision is carte blanche for suppression of anything the government doesn't like. With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-18 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
r by telephone or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer. Thank you for your co-operation. From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: Sunday 18 September 2016 22:37 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 As I said, no

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
eigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com] Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 9:04 PM To: John Woodgate ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 John Receiver Sensitivity is an Article 3.2 R

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-18 Thread Charlie Blackham
jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: 18 September 2016 20:45 To: Charlie Blackham; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 The draft specifies receiver sensitivity, which is surely not an EMC matter and severely restricts manufacturers' freedom of design and offering of a

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
o: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 David The other thing to add is that this is within scope of the Radio Equipment Directive, which must be applied from 13th June 2017, so you may wish to look at the receiver performance requirements in Draft ETSI EN 303

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-18 Thread Charlie Blackham
345%5C01.01.01_20%5Cen_303345v010101a.pdf> Regards Charlie From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: 18 September 2016 08:58 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032 EN 55032 is the successor of EN 55013, but 55013 is still valid at p

Re: [PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-18 Thread John Woodgate
esting to EN 55013 or EN 55032 Hi Would an FM receiver used in a motorcycle helmet be subject to testing under EN 55013 or EN 55032? Thanks in advance for any opinions. Regards, David Shidlowsky | Technical Reviewer Address 1 Bat-Sheva St. LOD 7120101 Israel Tel 972-8-9186113 Fax 972-8-915310

[PSES] FW: Testing to EN 55013 or EN 55032

2016-09-18 Thread itl-emc user group
Hi Would an FM receiver used in a motorcycle helmet be subject to testing under EN 55013 or EN 55032? Thanks in advance for any opinions. Regards, David Shidlowsky | Technical Reviewer Address 1 Bat-Sheva St. LOD 7120101 Israel Tel 972-8-9186113 Fax 972-8-9153101 Mail : dav...@itlglobal.org