On Saturday 03 April 2010, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Anybody have any clues? If I can get it to run back to 0,0,0, I'll
>> reboot.
>
>I think there was a recent fix that significantly reduced a memory leak
>in AXIS, specifically when you reload the G-code program. There
On Saturday 03 April 2010, Dave Caroline wrote:
>384meg is a bit on the low side, open a terminal and type
>top
>look at %wa should be 0 if its a high percentage its probably using
>swap memory...and that is a speed killer
>
>Dave Caroline
According to top, no swap. But when I last looked, before
On Saturday 03 April 2010, Michał Geszkiewicz wrote:
>Gene Heskett pisze:
>> Hi guys;
>>
>> I finally had to give up last night turn off the lights & monitor and
>> quit for the day. The computer got so sluggish I couldn't get anything
>> done although the emc background would keep running for a m
I have had exactly the same experience as Gene. I was using the Oword code
for making multiple parts (Xmas ornaments) this past winter. When I use the
touchoff to set the X then Y then Z workpiece origins, I had to go through
three reloads. By the time I set the Z, I was experiencing several min
using the hobbing setup should allow the spindle to drive a linear axis
instead of rotary axis then MPG tapping is possible
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > driving the spindle with an MPG would allow EMC2 to tap a hole in manual
> > mode
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> driving the spindle with an MPG would allow EMC2 to tap a hole in manual
> mode - interesting no?
>
Would be, if EMC2 actually geared to the spindle ;)
You wouldn't be able to do the "1/2 turn forward/1/4 turn back" method
though.
(which would have been much much ea
driving the spindle with an MPG would allow EMC2 to tap a hole in manual
mode - interesting no?
--
dos centavos
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
Jon Elson wrote:
> Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Nope, you are exactly right. On both accounts. Turning the spindle by hand
>> will make Z move until it gets to the Z specified in G33/33.1 then stop.
>> G33.1 will move back, but only when it is within the G33.1 bounds.
>>
>>
>
Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
>
>
>
> Nope, you are exactly right. On both accounts. Turning the spindle by hand
> will make Z move until it gets to the Z specified in G33/33.1 then stop.
> G33.1 will move back, but only when it is within the G33.1 bounds.
>
Are you sure? When the tap reaches t
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Anybody have any clues? If I can get it to run back to 0,0,0, I'll reboot.
>
I think there was a recent fix that significantly reduced a memory leak
in AXIS, specifically when you reload the G-code program. There is some
path display related variable that doesn't get p
Just to follow up on this earlier post.
> But, I'm taking a bit of a wild guess and thinking that you are only
> driving ONE of the motor's two phases.
This was indeed what the problem was.
Using the method Jon suggested (below) we found there was no power
coming into one phase of the motor.
W
384meg is a bit on the low side, open a terminal and type
top
look at %wa should be 0 if its a high percentage its probably using
swap memory...and that is a speed killer
Dave Caroline
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio E
Gene Heskett pisze:
> Hi guys;
>
> I finally had to give up last night turn off the lights & monitor and quit
> for the day. The computer got so sluggish I couldn't get anything done
> although the emc background would keep running for a minute or so after I
> stood on the esc key.
>
> My progr
Hi guys;
I finally had to give up last night turn off the lights & monitor and quit
for the day. The computer got so sluggish I couldn't get anything done
although the emc background would keep running for a minute or so after I
stood on the esc key.
My program is only about 70 lines of code
> Anyway, on the basis that a picture is worth a thousand words, here
> are approximatelt 2000 pictures.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhICrb0Tbn4
>
> --
> atp
>
>
The video is great, so is the result.
But the captions from youtube are hilarious ;) sounds like it has a bit
of a problem wi
Hi Andy:
Just wanted to say thanks for showing ur video of hobbing. It inspires the
rest of us to get off our a-- and do something. did u make the indexing
fixture your self??
Really cool:
Bill
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 01:20:34 +0100
Andy Pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2010 01:07, Frank Tkalcevic
At 04:45 PM 4/2/2010, you wrote:
>In the end I went for a fast rotary axis based on a 3/4"
>straight-shank ER32 collet chuck from eBay (about £15) with a 6:1 belt
>drive to a NEMA 23 stepper. This is held between taper-roller bearings
>in a housing that bolts to the table.
>The hob is mounted in th
17 matches
Mail list logo
