[Emc-users] General motion control question

2010-05-12 Thread Donnie Timmons
Using a 5i20 servo setup on inch based system running torque mode. What pin, signal or Parameter to I need to look at to see what the acceleration is set at. The acc seam slow when the Ini has "MAX_ACCELERATION = 32" Like wise I seam to get a following error with a small .1 move when the ini

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread cogoman
> I had a program that drilled a grid of holes in a plate. The plate was > bigger than my machine's travel limits, so I set up the program to do as > much as the machine could reach in one run. Then I moved the plate and > tried to use the same program to do another section of the plate, but

Re: [Emc-users] HAL_LIB modules

2010-05-12 Thread Dave
> No, I don't believe that will make any difference in this case. > > The kernel build system (kbuild) checks at compile time whether all the > symbols used by modules are present either in the kernel or some other > module and warns if they aren't all known symbols. > > emc depends on symbols pro

Re: [Emc-users] HAL_LIB modules

2010-05-12 Thread Jeff Epler
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:28:16PM -0400, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > You can't use the normal math libraries in kernel modules. There was a > commit a couple of days ago that was meant to silence some compiler > warnings, and it mentioned the "ceil" function. The check-in was on the > 2.4 b

Re: [Emc-users] HAL_LIB modules

2010-05-12 Thread Jeff Epler
The "ceil" function must be provided by rtai for realtime kernel modules. If you did not configure rtai properly, this function will not be available. In the packages linuxcnc.org provides for ubuntu 8.04, the 'ceil' function is provided by 'rtai_math.ko'. I believe this feature is included when

Re: [Emc-users] HAL_LIB modules

2010-05-12 Thread Stephen Wille Padnos
Dave wrote: > On 5/12/2010 7:45 PM, mari...@hall9000.com.br wrote: > >> Debug file >> information: >> insmod: error inserting >> '/usr/realtime/modules/emc2/motmod.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in >> module >> Mars-cnc.hal:5: exit value: 1 >> Mars-cnc.hal:5: insmod failed, >> returned -1 >> See the ou

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Jon Elson
Michał Geszkiewicz wrote: > > > Problem is that emc has 1000 lines readahead buffer so it will preload > and check against limits every preload line. > We will fix it, but for now if you all want to run it even if some line > in program is out of limit you must (only in 2.4.0 and further) > add l

Re: [Emc-users] HAL_LIB modules

2010-05-12 Thread Dave
On 5/12/2010 7:45 PM, mari...@hall9000.com.br wrote: > Debug file > information: > insmod: error inserting > '/usr/realtime/modules/emc2/motmod.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in > module > Mars-cnc.hal:5: exit value: 1 > Mars-cnc.hal:5: insmod failed, > returned -1 > See the output of 'dmesg' for more info

[Emc-users] HAL_LIB modules

2010-05-12 Thread mariano
Hello everyone Need help My configuration: Ubuntu 9.10 + EMC2 + RTAI-3.7.1 and MB ATOM 330. EMC does not run. Follow the debug information Print file information: RUN_IN_PLACE=no EMC2_DIR= EMC2_BIN_DIR=/usr/bin EMC2_TCL_DIR=/usr/share/emc/tcl EMC2_SCRIPT_DIR= EMC2_RTLIB_DIR=/usr/realtime/module

Re: [Emc-users] Xylotex XS3525/8S3 - 3 Axis - 425oz. Motors

2010-05-12 Thread Ries van Twisk
On May 12, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Shaffin Bhanji wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to setup EMC2 with my Xylotex XS3525/8S3 - 3 Axis - 425oz. > Motors Kit. Can someone please share the EMC2 configuration file > with me > to get a head start. > > Thank you all, > Shaffin. > Shaffin, use stepconf to

[Emc-users] Xylotex XS3525/8S3 - 3 Axis - 425oz. Motors

2010-05-12 Thread Shaffin Bhanji
Hello, I am trying to setup EMC2 with my Xylotex XS3525/8S3 - 3 Axis - 425oz. Motors Kit. Can someone please share the EMC2 configuration file with me to get a head start. Thank you all, Shaffin. -- __

Re: [Emc-users] Test

2010-05-12 Thread Dale J. Chatham
Nope, didn't receive a thing. :) On 05/12/2010 05:57 PM, Shaffin Bhanji wrote: > Hello out there, I am new to the EMC2 list - just testing to see whether > my emails com through, please ignore. > > Shaffin. > > > -- > > _

[Emc-users] Test

2010-05-12 Thread Shaffin Bhanji
Hello out there, I am new to the EMC2 list - just testing to see whether my emails com through, please ignore. Shaffin. -- ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourcefo

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Michał Geszkiewicz
Dave pisze: > On 5/12/2010 4:16 PM, Michał Geszkiewicz wrote: > >> Andy Pugh pisze: >> >> >>> On 12 May 2010 19:19, Slavko Kocjancic wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I still prefer to have complete program (or split part) inside travel's. Just in case if somebody ring in t

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Dave
On 5/12/2010 4:16 PM, Michał Geszkiewicz wrote: > Andy Pugh pisze: > >> On 12 May 2010 19:19, Slavko Kocjancic wrote: >> >> >> >>> I still prefer to have complete program (or split part) inside travel's. >>> Just in case if somebody ring in the door and that take little more time >>> tha

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Michał Geszkiewicz
Andy Pugh pisze: > On 12 May 2010 19:19, Slavko Kocjancic wrote: > > >> I still prefer to have complete program (or split part) inside travel's. >> Just in case if somebody ring in the door and that take little more time >> that I think. >> > > Well, perhaps the "Run Anyway?" should be fol

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Andy Pugh
On 12 May 2010 19:19, Slavko Kocjancic wrote: > I still prefer to have complete program (or split part) inside travel's. > Just in case if somebody ring in the door and that take little more time > that I think. Well, perhaps the "Run Anyway?" should be followed by "Are you really sure? you do r

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Steve Blackmore
On Tue, 11 May 2010 23:32:29 -0500, you wrote: >Any comments on this? The "run anyway" button now appears to not be >usable anymore. Yes, looks like nanny state police action :( If it asks me and I tell it to "run anyway" - I expect it to, no matter what. My deliberate decision, my problem if

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Slavko Kocjancic
Dave pravi: > On 5/12/2010 3:02 AM, Slavko Kocjancic wrote: > >> Jon Elson pravi: >> >> >>> There used to be a capability to run part of a G-code program that >>> exceeds the machine limits. >>> I tried doing this today, and got the first big dialog box that says >>> "program exceeds ma

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Dave
On 5/12/2010 3:02 AM, Slavko Kocjancic wrote: > Jon Elson pravi: > >> There used to be a capability to run part of a G-code program that >> exceeds the machine limits. >> I tried doing this today, and got the first big dialog box that says >> "program exceeds machine minimum on axis Y" and hit

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Jon Elson
Slavko Kocjancic wrote: > I don't want to run program that exceds machine limits. > If part is bigger than machine is capable I think the splitting file to > sections is "safe" way to do. > So each part fit into machine limits. Anyway when we move part in > machine then some new offset should be

Re: [Emc-users] part program exceeds machine limits

2010-05-12 Thread Slavko Kocjancic
Jon Elson pravi: > There used to be a capability to run part of a G-code program that > exceeds the machine limits. > I tried doing this today, and got the first big dialog box that says > "program exceeds machine minimum on axis Y" and hit the "run anyway" > button. I intended to stop the prog