On 18.05.12 17:25, Kent A. Reed wrote:
On 5/18/2012 4:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
BTW, now that we can't use EMC2 any more, and LinuxCNC seems longish
and awkward to type, I am tempted to start using LCNC.
It has seemed to me LCNC would be a good compromise if anyone starts
tackling
On 18.05.12 23:09, Jon Elson wrote:
The description in the user manual is almost completely incomprehensible.
G10 L20 makes a little bit of sense, G10 L2 makes no sense at all.
The new web page:
I've got 2 D510's and one the cd drive interface suffers from dain
bamage and the second one I've done the bios upgrade and it is fine and
running 10.04 on my BP.
John
On 5/18/2012 9:29 AM, Dave Engvall wrote:
Hi all,
About a year ago I acquired a D510M0. A few days ago I found a
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Erik Christiansen
dva...@internode.on.net wrote:
On 5/18/2012 4:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
BTW, now that we can't use EMC2 any more, and LinuxCNC seems longish
and awkward to type, I am tempted to start using LCNC.
Err, are we to be the group with no
On 05/19/2012 06:06 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
It scares me that coordinate offsets could be cumulative. Coordinate
offsets (workspaces) should not nest, I believe. I have not read
anything in the doco to say that they do.
That doesn't scare me at all, as long as the documentation is
LMC?
--- On Sat, 5/19/12, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] A rose by any name? [Was: Not so custom]
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Saturday, May 19, 2012, 11:08 AM
On Sat, May 19,
Erik Christiansen wrote:
Um ... that's always been my problem, when reading the older
documentation. i.e. where the machine is NOW w.r.t. what? Yes, touch
off from the workpiece, and those other references become moot.
It scares me that coordinate offsets could be cumulative. Coordinate
Did how subroutines work change from 2.3 to 2.5?
I had a file I ran 6 months ago on 2.3 and with no changes just
moved it to the new computer w/2.5 and I get an error :
unable to open file
The sub is in the same program just at the bottom
%
some code
o31 call (is the line where the
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Terry Christophersen
tcninj...@yahoo.com wrote:
Did how subroutines work change from 2.3 to 2.5?
I had a file I ran 6 months ago on 2.3 and with no changes just
I am not aware of any changes but the subroutines should be defined before use
Thanks Dave taat worked,
So it did change sort of because I have 2.3 on a desktop and it worked at the
end of the program
Thanks again
Terry
- Original Message -
From: Dave Caroline dave.thearchiv...@gmail.com
To: Terry Christophersen tcninj...@yahoo.com; Enhanced Machine Controller
LMC or LNC sounds good to me
- Original Message -
From: charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] A rose by any name? [Was: Not so custom]
LMC?
--- On Sat,
On Saturday, May 19, 2012 05:16:44 PM cogoman did opine:
On 05/19/2012 06:06 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
It scares me that coordinate offsets could be cumulative. Coordinate
offsets (workspaces) should not nest, I believe. I have not read
anything in the doco to say that they do.
Greetings,
I seem to have the damping turned all the way up on my Gecko 320, but it is
still underdamped.
Is it possible to increase damping with the PID settings (I am using the Pico
Systems USC board)?
Would gearing down my drive further help with damping if I it is not possible
to
Terry Christophersen wrote:
LMC or LNC sounds good to m
Logical Microcomputer Company made Unix-based computers using the
Nat Semi 32016 CPU back in the late 80's. The system was a dog, for
reasons I don't quite understand, maybe rotten compilers. I'm pretty
sure they have been out of business
Jeshua Lacock wrote:
Greetings,
I seem to have the damping turned all the way up on my Gecko 320, but it is
still underdamped.
Is it possible to increase damping with the PID settings (I am using the Pico
Systems USC board)?
Would gearing down my drive further help with damping if I it
On 05/19/2012 07:52 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Terry Christophersen wrote:
LMC or LNC sounds good to m
Logical Microcomputer Company made Unix-based computers using the
Nat Semi 32016 CPU back in the late 80's. The system was a dog, for
reasons I don't quite understand, maybe rotten compilers.
On May 19, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
I seem to have the damping turned all the way up on my Gecko 320, but it is
still underdamped.
Is it possible to increase damping with the PID settings (I am using the
Pico Systems USC board)?
Would gearing down my drive further help with
snip
Hi Jon,
Well lets just say the only thing that I am sure about is the
drive is under-damped.
;)
Tuning is proving to be insanely difficult for me, I guess
mostly because I don't really have much of a clue what I am
doing. It is also kind of scary because if I turn a POT on
On May 19, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Steve Stallings wrote:
Is this a G320 or a G320X? If it is a G320X there are internal
DIP switches that can be used to reduce the torque gain which
might help with stability.
Do your encoders have selectable resolution? A lower resolution
might also help tame
three letters is only 17576 choices. good bet they are all taken. four
alphanumeric is only 1.6 million choices. eemmcc22? llmmcc, llnncc??
ellemcee. anLanMaC.
--- On Sat, 5/19/12, Mark Cason farmerboy1...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Mark Cason farmerboy1...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re:
20 matches
Mail list logo
