On 09/29/2016 01:11 PM, Jim Craig wrote:
... snip
> My machine uses NMTB30 tool holders so it would not be a direct fit. The
> concept is good. I might try to replicate the mechanism. However the
> wrist looks like it could be complicated to get that motion.
>
> Do you happen to have an exploded vi
On Thursday 29 September 2016 17:26:26 John Thornton wrote:
> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/
>
Thanks John. Skimming thru that, the most promising path I see might be
in cobbling up something useing sampler, hal_sampler, streamer and
hal_streamer, if the output could somehow be dumped, not
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/
On 9/29/2016 4:11 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2016 17:00:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> This question may have the genesis of a clue in the Integrators Manual,
> unforch the copy available on the web page, development branch dated
> about 2 w
On Thursday 29 September 2016 17:00:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
This question may have the genesis of a clue in the Integrators Manual,
unforch the copy available on the web page, development branch dated
about 2 weeks ago, is not in English. Is there any way to fix that?
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Hesk
On Thursday 29 September 2016 12:15:01 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Sitting here waiting for the coffee to kick in, and lamenting the
> difficulty in doing math in hal.
>
> That bit of hal stuff I can watch with a halmeter needs some math to
> translate the encoder counts of the oversh
There is room for a camper.
On Sep 29, 2016 3:25 PM, "Ed" wrote:
> On 09/28/2016 05:36 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > On 8/22/2016 11:55 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> >> On 08/22/2016 10:35 AM, Ed wrote:
> >>> I haven't been paying attention to this. Is this the correct date?
> >> The pl
On 09/28/2016 05:36 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 8/22/2016 11:55 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>> On 08/22/2016 10:35 AM, Ed wrote:
>>> I haven't been paying attention to this. Is this the correct date?
>> The plan is:
>>
>> Monday October 17 through Sunday October 23
>> Helix Machine, 343
On 9/29/2016 2:37 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On 09/29/2016 12:00 PM, Jim Craig wrote:
>> On 9/29/2016 1:02 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
>>> Just in case someone might be interested:
>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/121734977870
>>>
>>> My slightly smaller ST-N as reference:
>>> http://www.wallacecompany.com/m
On 09/29/2016 12:00 PM, Jim Craig wrote:
> On 9/29/2016 1:02 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
>> Just in case someone might be interested:
>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/121734977870
>>
>> My slightly smaller ST-N as reference:
>> http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/Shizuoka/
>>
> That tool changer setup
There is a branch of linuxcnc that one of the developers was working on
(micges/master/limited_jerk) based on work by Yi-Shin Li. This used the
1 segment look ahead planner (pre 2.7) and added jerk limited
calculations. It was never finished and still has issues with acc/vel
violations.
This
MAX_JERK is not used by LinuxCNC (up to and including the development branch)
Jeff
--
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/li
On 9/29/2016 1:02 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> Just in case someone might be interested:
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/121734977870
>
> My slightly smaller ST-N as reference:
> http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/Shizuoka/
>
That tool changer setup looks perfect for my machine. Do you have a
video
I was doing tuning for my 3D carving profile and started experimenting with the
per-axis MAX_JERK in the .ini file [AXIS_x] sections. LinuxCNC 2.7.4.
The value I had initially was 2000, I gave it 20 and 2.
It made no change at all to the runtime, nor did the machine look to jerk
around any
Just in case someone might be interested:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/121734977870
My slightly smaller ST-N as reference:
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/Shizuoka/
--
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/
-
Greetings all;
Sitting here waiting for the coffee to kick in, and lamenting the
difficulty in doing math in hal.
That bit of hal stuff I can watch with a halmeter needs some math to
translate the encoder counts of the overshoot into actual distance it
represents. Then somehow, dynamically as
Hi
I just tried to link all three axis:
net emcmot.00.pos-cmd axis.0.motor-pos-cmd=> pid.0.command
net emcmot.00.pos-cmd => pid.1.command
net emcmot.00.pos-cmd => pid.2.command
That seams to work. I can't home any more, but for now that's good
enough.
Thanks for your super quick support.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, at 11:15 AM, John Kasunich wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Florian Rist wrote:
> > Could I do something with the axis jog pins:
> >
> > axis.0.jog-vel-mode
> > axis.0.jog-enable
> > axis.0.jog-scale
>
> Those are for using a jogwheel. See
> http:/
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Florian Rist wrote:
> Hi John
>
> > Do you need/intend to use g-code at all for this installation?
>
> Yes.
In that case you want the LinuxCNC motion planner. It will
handle all the jogging, homing, etc, for you.
>
> And I'm now just trying to modify it qu
Hi Andy,
thanks for the suggestion:
> Connect the buttons to the halui.jog.N.minus and halui.jog.N.plus pins
That is indeed very easy. I just tried this. It kind of works.
Unfortunately the axis do not move fully synchronized. X starts first, a
fraction of second later y start to turn and y is
Hi John
> Do you need/intend to use g-code at all for this installation?
Yes.
And I'm now just trying to modify it quickly to do a manual
demonstration.
Could I do something with the axis jog pins:
axis.0.jog-vel-mode
axis.0.jog-enable
axis.0.jog-scale
> I have a few custom HAL compon
On 29 September 2016 at 14:58, Florian Rist wrote:
> Whats the best way to do this
Connect the buttons to the halui.jog.N.minus and halui.jog.N.plus pins
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.7/html/man/man1/halui.1.html
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed f
On Thursday 29 September 2016 08:34:53 Jim Craig wrote:
> On 9/28/2016 9:35 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> > On 29 September 2016 at 02:32, Jeff Epler
wrote:
> >> Besides the social aspects, some of my goals are to
> >> - take a look at some of the things in our github tracker that
> >> are languishin
On Thursday 29 September 2016 07:50:23 Sarah Armstrong wrote:
> i'm looking at a renishaw MP10 IR probe
> iv'e posted some snipps of what i am , ( or better think i am )
> getting as an output
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kwjxef6k4ptbhhb/AABdCLSjzypH574XoXJv_it3a?d
>l=0
>
> it looks to me all it
Do you need/intend to use g-code at all for this installation?
If not, it is probably a good candidate for a "hal-only" configuration.
Stepgens, limit2 or limit3 blocks, muxes, integrators, etc, can be used
to do just about anything you can imagine. PyVCP can be used for
on-screen controls, and j
Maybe some kins so it is a real vector (I think that is what another
art installation did)
Dave Caroline
--
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://li
Hi,
just a simple question:
I need to add two momentary switches to a 3 axis machine (not a mill,
more like a art installation) that jog all axis (xyz). Press one button
all axis move up, press the other one all move done in sync.
Whats the best way to do this. The three axis are moved by servo
On 9/28/2016 9:35 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 29 September 2016 at 02:32, Jeff Epler wrote:
>
>> Besides the social aspects, some of my goals are to
>> - take a look at some of the things in our github tracker that are
>> languishing
>>
> One thing that I find myself coming back to, and is loo
i'm looking at a renishaw MP10 IR probe
iv'e posted some snipps of what i am , ( or better think i am ) getting as
an output
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kwjxef6k4ptbhhb/AABdCLSjzypH574XoXJv_it3a?dl=0
it looks to me all it's doing is giving a constant mark space ratio , and
stopping on a probe hit
28 matches
Mail list logo
