Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-22 Thread andy pugh
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 05:25, Scott Harwell via Emc-users < emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Try this website. > https://www.haascnc.com/service/troubleshooting-and-how-to/reference-documents/tool-holder-and-pull-stud-specifications.html > It has all dims for tool types. I think that

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-21 Thread Scott Harwell via Emc-users
Try this website. https://www.haascnc.com/service/troubleshooting-and-how-to/reference-documents/tool-holder-and-pull-stud-specifications.html It has all dims for tool types. Scott On Sunday, June 21, 2020, 1:14:37 PM CDT, N wrote: Thanks, I will remove first and try to check

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-21 Thread N
Thanks, I will remove first and try to check carefully. > The belleville stack will almost certainly remove out the top. > Some machines have two different width keys. The taper adapters will only > orient in a single direction. > Andy is correct! You MUST have the correct retention knob. There

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-21 Thread Stuart Stevenson
The belleville stack will almost certainly remove out the top. Some machines have two different width keys. The taper adapters will only orient in a single direction. Andy is correct! You MUST have the correct retention knob. There are a million different knobs to choose from. Be very careful. On

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-21 Thread N
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 16:11, N wrote: > > > > > Looking closer on chuck and slit, to long and wrong shape. Neither of them > > fit with tool changer. I tried ISO40 (DIN2080) so now is the question if I > > should try BT40 (JIS B6339) or SK40 (DIN69871) or both. > > > There is a risk of

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-21 Thread andy pugh
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 16:11, N wrote: > > Looking closer on chuck and slit, to long and wrong shape. Neither of them > fit with tool changer. I tried ISO40 (DIN2080) so now is the question if I > should try BT40 (JIS B6339) or SK40 (DIN69871) or both. There is a risk of damaging the petal

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-21 Thread N
Me become old and stupid, maybe some good alcohol would dissolve some old thinking. Looking closer on chuck and slit, to long and wrong shape. Neither of them fit with tool changer. I tried ISO40 (DIN2080) so now is the question if I should try BT40 (JIS B6339) or SK40 (DIN69871) or both. It

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-14 Thread Stuart Stevenson
If the belleville washer stack will not compress far enough to open the fingers to allow the retention knob to enter then some of the belleville washers have broken. The broken pieces will self arrange in layers. That will mechanically restrict the collapse of the stack. A new stack of washers is

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside -- now I know but does not work

2020-06-14 Thread N
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 14:47, N wrote: > > > Modig MD6000. > > > > There is one here doing tool-changes with LinuxCNC. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkAjD2iKizU > It isn't clear from the noises if it is a hydraulic or pneumatic clamp... > > But, this message on the forum from the same

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside --> now I know

2020-06-07 Thread Ed
On 6/7/20 10:01 AM, N wrote: Modig MD6000. As far as I can tell hydraulic pump used to release tool and pressure release valve to lock tool. It is not stated if pressure release valve is hydraulic or pneumatic but as hydraulic pump is turned of then retracting I guess pressure release

Re: [Emc-users] Can't get chuck inside --> now I know

2020-06-07 Thread N
> > Modig MD6000. > > > > There is one here doing tool-changes with LinuxCNC. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkAjD2iKizU > It isn't clear from the noises if it is a hydraulic or pneumatic clamp... > > But, this message on the forum from the same chap says that the clamp is > hydraulic: >