The ramps are essential for full strength as they remove the need for
a safety groove
Dave Caroline
On 19/05/2014, Steve Blackmore wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014 12:45:08 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>I'm still not seeing why G76 has a entry and exit ramp. I believe the
>>intent was to deal with Z acceler
On 19 May 2014 08:27, Dave Caroline wrote:
> The ramps are essential for full strength as they remove the need for
> a safety groove
You don't need a safety groove anyway with a conventional threading
operation, the retract move seems consistent.
I am prepared to believe that a taper-out might gi
On 19 May 2014 05:32, Konstantin Navrockiy wrote:
> We have a board 5i25 with firmware 5i25_7i77x2.
> Can only work one board 7i77 at connector P2?
One 7i77 on connector P2 and one on P3.
If you want a second 7i77 you will need a header-connector. A standard
parallel-port one will work, and they
On May 19, 2014 7:36 AM, "Konstantin Navrockiy" wrote:
>
> We have a board 5i25 with firmware 5i25_7i77x2.
> Can only work one board 7i77 at connector P2?
It seems that we can only guess, what exactly is meant by this question.
If it is meant as a question, if it is possible to attach one 7i77 t
IMHO, there’s a big “it depends” issue when we look at advice on computers.
As I see it, there are at least three types of users —
The first is the person who’s using their machines to make a living, or at
least to turn a buck. For that user, I’d most likely recommend building your
own computer
The other place ramping seems to be quite important is in
cutting a "higbee" thread. This operation follows the threading
cycle with a grooving tool for the first thread, ramping out
over one revolution to get rid of the sharp burr formed between
a 60deg thread and a 45deg chamfer. I haven't actu
On 19 May 2014 02:23, Steve Blackmore wrote:
> Rude Andy!
> If you configure it once in 2008 why/how the hell would you remember
> what you did then?
OK, perhaps Aram has had no requirement to change his LinuxCNC
configuration for the last 6 years.
To make the THCAD control feed rate:
1) Make
On 05/19/2014 08:15 AM, toolznglue wrote:
>
> The first is the person who’s using their machines to make a living, or at
> least to turn a buck. For that user, I’d most likely recommend building your
> own computer using various motherboards, video boards, and I/O boards that
> places like Micro
On May 17, 2014 6:58 PM, "Peter C. Wallace" wrote:
>
> 7I39 5V power
>
> You can check the config by looking at the dmesg list or running
>
> sudo mesaflash --device 5i24 --readhmid
Both boards have 4,96 V on pins of 7i39's P1 (both receive power through
flat cable). I checked with multimeter on
Am 18.05.2014 17:45, schrieb Rafael Skodlar:
> Erik,
>
> On 05/18/2014 12:42 AM, erik wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Following these instructions
>> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Build_A_Simulator_Manually
>> worked for my last setup with Ubuntu 12.4 (32Bit) quite well.
>>
>> Now I have
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Viesturs L?cis wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:17:07 +0300
From: "[ISO-8859-13] Viesturs L?cis"
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller, (EMC)"
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 5i24?
On May 17, 2014 6:58 PM, "Peter C. Wallace" wrote:
Thanks to everyone who replied. Sounds like if I'm willing to accept
slow performance, it's just a matter of trying to load LCNC and see if
it will run on a particular box. Some of the older ones mentioned are
in the range of the ones I have, so there is some hope.
Thanks again.
Raymond Juli
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Viesturs L?cis wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:17:07 +0300
From: "[ISO-8859-13] Viesturs L?cis"
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller, (EMC)"
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 5i24?
On May 17, 2014 6:58 PM, "Peter C. Wallace" wrote:
This discussion of old hardware is very timely, I am starting out with a
Gateway 1gig, 640Megs RAM. I've run the test program for latency. Doesn't look
good. I will have to decide how to proceed. End goal is a hobby engraver
similar to one I built using MAXNC
second on the optiplex
jeremy youngs
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 08:15 AM, toolznglue wrote:
> >
> > The first is the person who’s using their machines to make a living, or
> at least to turn a buck. For that user, I’d most likely recommend building
> y
On 5/19/2014 5:36 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
> second on the optiplex
How about a OptiPlex GX240?
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
"A
im running a 720, had an old 240 but never used it for lcnc
jeremy youngs
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> On 5/19/2014 5:36 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
> > second on the optiplex
>
> How about a OptiPlex GX240?
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware bec
I use GX270's successfully, but I didn't care much for running with 260's, so
if a 240 is much slower than a 260 I'd keep looking.
-- Ralph
Gregg Eshelman wrote:
On 5/19/2014 5:36 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
> second on the optiplex
How about a OptiPlex GX240?
---
This email is free from viru
On 05/16/2014 10:09 AM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Guys,
>Is there anything planned for this summer?
>
OK, I made a vague offer of a get together in the Missouri
Ozarks
some time ago. BUT -- my friend's nephew went out to the cabin
in January, turned on the water system and had pipes blow. I'
On 05/19/2014 06:53 PM, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> On 5/19/2014 5:36 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
>> second on the optiplex
> How about a OptiPlex GX240?
>
I use a GX260 to demo LinuxCNC at shows with my minimill.
It works quite well. I think the GX240 is a pretty similar
machine,
just a little older.
still working on getting back to missouri jon, right now it looks like
august. After i get back and get things lined back up im thinking my place
provides all of the above and 7 miles from the eleven point river. but the
earliest i see that working would be next year
jeremy youngs
On Mon, May
On 5/19/2014 7:07 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 06:53 PM, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
>> On 5/19/2014 5:36 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
>>> second on the optiplex
>> How about a OptiPlex GX240?
>>
> I use a GX260 to demo LinuxCNC at shows with my minimill.
> It works quite well. I think the GX240 is
22 matches
Mail list logo
