On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 01:49:57 AM gene heskett did opine:
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 01:33:48 AM Kent A. Reed did opine:
> > On 1/30/2012 11:35 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> > > So at the moment, I'm back to being bumfuzzled again. No clue what
> > > I changed that would have screwed up th
On 30.01.12 12:37, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> On 1/30/2012 7:54 AM, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> I would hope for
>
> 1) a formal description of the grammar we already have. As Erik points
> out, the LinuxCNC interpreter implicitly defines a grammar. It's just
> hard to tell what the grammar is. It's hard
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 01:33:48 AM Kent A. Reed did opine:
> On 1/30/2012 11:35 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> > So at the moment, I'm back to being bumfuzzled again. No clue what I
> > changed that would have screwed up the older emc-2.6.0-pre after its
> > been reinstalled.
>
> Me neither. T
On 1/30/2012 11:35 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> On Monday, January 30, 2012 10:57:23 PM Kent A. Reed did opine:
>
>> On 1/30/2012 8:36 PM, gene heskett wrote:
>>> Greetings all;
>>>
>>> Just in the last day it has come to my attention that both
>>> emc-2.6.0-pre (latest emc from buildbot, master-rt br
On 30.01.12 05:35, Mark Wendt wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 01:14 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>
> > 1) Be mnemonic. i.e. give some farnarckling clue as to what the command
> > does. (Even "MOV" is orders of magnitude superior to "0x01" or "g01".)
> >
>
> Erik, is this what you meant by "farnark
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:22:36 -0600
Jon Elson wrote:
> Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> >
> > I would like to ask, if anyone could provide some recommendations
> > for US Digital encoders - I chose them, because they seem to be
> > next in the line in terms of affordability.
> >
> US Digital may not be
On Monday, January 30, 2012 10:57:23 PM Kent A. Reed did opine:
> On 1/30/2012 8:36 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > Just in the last day it has come to my attention that both
> > emc-2.6.0-pre (latest emc from buildbot, master-rt branch) and the
> > slightly newer renamed linux
On 1/30/2012 8:36 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Just in the last day it has come to my attention that both emc-2.6.0-pre
> (latest emc from buildbot, master-rt branch) and the slightly newer renamed
> linuxcnc-2.6.0-pre (latest from buildbot) are both running exclusively on
> cpu0, a
Greetings all;
Just in the last day it has come to my attention that both emc-2.6.0-pre
(latest emc from buildbot, master-rt branch) and the slightly newer renamed
linuxcnc-2.6.0-pre (latest from buildbot) are both running exclusively on
cpu0, and about tapping it out, even at 65 u-sec base loo
are you using the ttl -> differential converter/transmitters that you
can get for the CUI/AMT encoders? (they are <$10 US) we had issues with
ttl encoders above about 15ft. (shielded cable) We have used them on our
conversion and they work great (even for non cui/amt encoders)
sam
On 01/30/201
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> 2012/1/30 Peter C. Wallace :
>>
>> I am suggesting this test because if there is a noise problem, different
>> encoders may not help.
>
> Of course, I totally agree, but I just did not see a reason for noise by now.
>
>> A possible noise sour
2012/1/30 Peter C. Wallace :
>
> I am suggesting this test because if there is a noise problem, different
> encoders may not help.
Of course, I totally agree, but I just did not see a reason for noise by now.
> A possible noise source is the PWM signals. This can
> couple into the encoder if the
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Viesturs L?cis wrote:
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:33:57 +0200
> From: "[UTF-8] Viesturs L?cis"
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] US Digital encoders?
>
> 2012/1/30 Peter C. Wallace :
>
2012/1/30 Peter C. Wallace :
>
> Before you change encoders, and noting that others have used the CUI/AMT
> encoders with success, can you try a little experiment to make sure this is
> not a noise --> losing count/commutation issue?
Thank You for the explanation! I really appreciate that! And thi
As noted in the fine manuals all names get converted to lower case... so
uppercase, humpy back file names will fail to load. Also remember the
first file that the whatever it is finds is the one it uses and I think
the search path is noted in the manuals as well...
John
On 1/30/2012 11:45 AM,
On 1/30/2012 11:32 AM, gene heskett wrote:
> On Monday, January 30, 2012 12:17:58 PM John Thornton did opine:
>
>> If your using 2.4
>>
>> http://linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode_main.html#r3_7
>>
>> if your using 2.5
>>
>> http://linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/gcode/o-code.html#_calling_files
> I
On Monday, January 30, 2012 01:01:04 PM Erik Friesen did opine:
> Another gotcha with this, upper and lowercase doesn't seem to work.
> Keep everything lowercase with both filename and subname.
>
That is because by the time it looks for filename, filename has been lower
cased. That is stated
On 1/30/2012 12:32 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> On Monday, January 30, 2012 12:17:58 PM John Thornton did opine:
>
>> <...>
> I didn't find this one in my searches of the wiki last night, and while its
> a bit concise, it does say it all according to what I found by the 10,000
> moneys theory workings
Another gotcha with this, upper and lowercase doesn't seem to work. Keep
everything lowercase with both filename and subname.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:16 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> On Monday, January 30, 2012 11:40:25 AM John Thornton did opine:
>
> > If your using 2.4
> >
> > http://linuxcnc
On Monday, January 30, 2012 12:17:58 PM John Thornton did opine:
> If your using 2.4
>
> http://linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode_main.html#r3_7
>
> if your using 2.5
>
> http://linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/gcode/o-code.html#_calling_files
I didn't find this one in my searches of the wiki last
On 1/30/2012 7:54 AM, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 12:28 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>> On 29.01.12 23:05, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
>>> <...>
>> <...>
>> It is worth understanding that the current parser _does_ have a fixed
>> grammar, just like the proposed alternative. The significant diff
Viesturs Lācis wrote:
>
> I would like to ask, if anyone could provide some recommendations for
> US Digital encoders - I chose them, because they seem to be next in
> the line in terms of affordability.
>
US Digital may not be the greatest. At least, at one time, you had to
add capacitors
to t
On Monday, January 30, 2012 11:40:25 AM John Thornton did opine:
> If your using 2.4
>
> http://linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode_main.html#r3_7
>
> if your using 2.5
>
> http://linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/gcode/o-code.html#_calling_files
>
> http://linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/ini_con
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Viesturs L?cis wrote:
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:18:51 +0200
> From: "[UTF-8] Viesturs L?cis"
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: [Emc-users] US Digital encoders?
>
> Hello!
>
> The conclusion of my st
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Viesturs L?cis wrote:
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:18:51 +0200
> From: "[UTF-8] Viesturs L?cis"
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: [Emc-users] US Digital encoders?
>
> Hello!
>
> The conclusion of my st
On 01/30/2012 12:28 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 29.01.12 23:05, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
>> Are you suggesting that a three axis machine where there is
>> no A axis should have a different grammar than a four axis machine that
>> does have an A axis.
> No, there is no such constraint in the curr
If your using 2.4
http://linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode_main.html#r3_7
if your using 2.5
http://linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/gcode/o-code.html#_calling_files
http://linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/ini_config.html#_rs274ngc_section_a_id_sub_rs274ngc_section_a
John
On 1/29/2012 5:59 PM,
> I would like to ask, if anyone could provide some recommendations for
> US Digital encoders - I chose them, because they seem to be next in
> the line in terms of affordability.
> I was particularly looking at E7P.
> I have Keling KL23BLS_115 Nema 23 servo motors:
> http://kelinginc.net/KL23BLS_1
On 01/30/2012 01:14 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> 1) Be mnemonic. i.e. give some farnarckling clue as to what the command
> does. (Even "MOV" is orders of magnitude superior to "0x01" or "g01".)
>
Erik, is this what you meant by "farnarkling":
http://mirror.uncyc.org/wiki/Farnarkling ;
Hello!
The conclusion of my struggle with tuning servo motors is that I shall
change encoders. I based it on Jon's findings, when testing AMT 102
encoders and I also got a feedback from a local guy, who also had used
them on a cnc machine.
Sorry, Peter, I could not figure out, how to precisely sto
On Monday, January 30, 2012 04:36:56 AM Erik Christiansen did opine:
> I'm still catching up on a 1200 post backlog across a couple of lists,
> so here's a late reply.
>
> On 25.01.12 05:44, gene heskett wrote:
> > I looked at the gawk man page, didn't see any mention of floating
> > point math s
I'm still catching up on a 1200 post backlog across a couple of lists,
so here's a late reply.
On 25.01.12 05:44, gene heskett wrote:
> I looked at the gawk man page, didn't see any mention of floating point
> math so I kept on looking. Bash only does integer. Didn't see any mention
> of sed &
2012/1/29 Kirk Wallace :
>
> Maybe I'm too picky, but "WT_" may be considered offensive to some.
I sincerely apologize, if anyone felt it inappropriate!
Viesturs
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The mos
33 matches
Mail list logo
