Chris
I'll run some tests and let you know the outcome.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
Subj: Re: [Emc-users] Not so custom
Date: Fri 18 May 2012 6:08
Size: 1K
To: EMC emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
If StepConfig added a warning comment
Le 15.05.2012 14:27, Erik Christiansen a écrit :
On 14.05.12 08:15, Ted Hyde wrote:
I've noticed that the current online spec sheet for the standard
PicoPSU says PG is acceptable between 10.5 and 13.5 vdc. It's not a
bold statement spec - you have to hunt for it. However, I'd believe
it in
From: Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Compiling 2.5 as simulator
To review the bidding,
1) you built the binaries for LinuxCNC 2.6.0~pre on openSUSE 11.3 and
they work on both openSUSE 11.3 and 12.1.
2) you built the binaries for LinuxCNC 2.5 on openSUSE 12.1
Hi all,
About a year ago I acquired a D510M0. A few days ago I found a 'roundtoit' and
started to build a replacement controller for my cinci.
The present one is a Duron 1200 running 8.04/2.4.6/7. ;-)
Hardware:
mini-itx D510M0
2 x 2Gb 800 MHz patriot memory sticks (DDR2)
2012/5/18 Dave Engvall dengv...@charter.net:
the ideal board would be something like the D510 with an ide port so I can
use my CF.
Lacking the availability of that maybe something like the D525MW would be
appropriate.
There are lots of cheap sata--cf adapters on ebay.
I put it in one of
The first thing to do is to go to the Intel site and get the BIOS updates
and bring the mobo up to date.
I got my D510 about a year ago and I had similar issues, and the update
solved he problems. I made entries on the wiki.
--Ray M jrmitche...@gmail.com
A foolish faith in authority is the
On 18 May 2012 15:29, Dave Engvall dengv...@charter.net wrote:
About a year ago I acquired a D510M0.
...
After trying many times (insanity) to get the 510 to install 10.04/2.5 (live)
I have a D510MO running 10.04 and 2.5 (and 2.4, and 2.6).
I installed from USB stick. I don't know if that
Hi all,
The setting of the coordinate system (G53-g59.3) is not working the way I
expected, and I am trying to figure out what I am doing wrong. I am running
linuxcnc 2.5, BTW.
After initialization and homing, if I issue:
G53 G0 X0 Y0
It will correctly move to absolute machine 0, 0.
This
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 17:50 +0300, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
2012/5/18 Dave Engvall dengv...@charter.net:
the ideal board would be something like the D510 with an ide port so I can
use my CF.
Lacking the availability of that maybe something like the D525MW would be
appropriate.
There are
2012/5/18 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
On 18 May 2012 15:29, Dave Engvall dengv...@charter.net wrote:
About a year ago I acquired a D510M0.
...
After trying many times (insanity) to get the 510 to install 10.04/2.5 (live)
I have a D510MO running 10.04 and 2.5 (and 2.4, and 2.6).
I
Hi all,
Oops, I think I found it (haven't tested yet). I think I am off by one in P
value. I don't understand why it worked the first time however.
Regards,
Eric
Hi all,
The setting of the coordinate system (G53-g59.3) is not working the way I
expected, and I am trying to figure out what I am
Hi all,
Oops again, just a typo on my part. I was using coordinate system 3, but
erroneously referred to it is 2. So the P values are being used correctly
and the problem remains.
Regards,
Eric
Hi all,
Oops, I think I found it (haven't tested yet). I think I am off by one in P
value. I don't
Yes, it is indeed frustrating! I now have the latest bios update ( I think ).
MO542P.bio.
My usual methods for burning to a cd aren't working. System is too smart to
take a .bio file. Intel says it will work with either a keystick or cd.
I'm on a mac mini with Snow Leopard, yes I know
last time I had to burn a bios, I installed freedos on a usb drive. It
was a bit annoying trying to remember how to navigate on DOS, and the bios
was on a weird drive letter, but I ended up figuring it out.
Eric Keller
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Dave Engvall dengv...@charter.net wrote:
Eric H. Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
Oops again, just a typo on my part. I was using coordinate system 3, but
erroneously referred to it is 2. So the P values are being used correctly
and the problem remains.
Why are you working in the machine coordinate system? I never do that,
it is for
On 5/18/2012 4:40 AM, Robert von Knobloch wrote:
From: Kent A. Reedkentallanr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Compiling 2.5 as simulator
...deleted lots of twaddle...
Regards,
Kent
Yes Kent,
but just for clarity LinuxCNC 2.5 on openSUSE 12.1 works fine, it is
only the 'live plot'
Jon,
I am using the coordinate systems as a means of getting multiple tools
offset in X and Y from each other so they can land on top of each other.
IOW, do a pass with one tool, then apply the offsets of another tool but
otherwise follow the same tool path. For example:
G54 - Null Tool
G55 -
I insmod the rtai_smi.ko module but I am still getting that ~64sec
latency spiking.lax max is usually less than 10K but spikes to
160k.
I noticed for some reason I noticed rtai_sched.ko was not loaded and
cannot be load when rtai_lxrt is loaded.
Is the problem with the rtai_lxrt/rtai_sched
On 18 May 2012 19:38, Eric H. Johnson ejohn...@camalytics.com wrote:
I am using the coordinate systems as a means of getting multiple tools
offset in X and Y from each other so they can land on top of each other.
You _could_ do that with tool offsets in the tool table. (I think).
All tools
On 18 May 2012 19:41, Tux Lab project.tux...@gmail.com wrote:
I insmod the rtai_smi.ko module but I am still getting that ~64sec
latency spiking. lax max is usually less than 10K but spikes to
160k.
Latency spike every 64 seconds? Sounds exactly like SMI to me.
Andy,
You _could_ do that with tool offsets in the tool table. (I think).
All tools have spaces for offsets in XYZUVW.
Are you talking about tool.tbl in the config directory? It looks to me like
you can only set tool length
and diameter. Am I missing something? If I could do that this would
Andy,
No, that does seem wrong and strange. I wonder if it is a synch problem,
one part of the code not updating because it thinks nothing has changed on
the basis of an internal value but another part of the code getting the
information from the not-updated section?
I have used this basic
Andy,
I do need to pay more attention to the change log. I waited for 2.5 for this
application specifically for the ability to put named subroutines in their
own folder. I did not realize the tool table functionality had changed in
the previous version.
Thanks,
Eric
Yes.
Which LinuxCNC version
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Chris Morley
chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
As for using GIT to keep track of files - yes that would work great but,
what new user is going to learn about git just to configure the machine?
OK, but on the other hand GIT is such a useful habit in all
On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:18:40 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/17/2012 6:43 AM, John Thornton wrote:
Pretty impressive for DIY, too bad they don't know anything about
straightening wire... those lead in rollers are totally wrong if
their intention was to straighten the
Eric H. Johnson wrote:
Jon,
I am using the coordinate systems as a means of getting multiple tools
offset in X and Y from each other so they can land on top of each other.
IOW, do a pass with one tool, then apply the offsets of another tool but
otherwise follow the same tool path.
I thought
Eric H. Johnson wrote:
Andy,
You _could_ do that with tool offsets in the tool table. (I think).
All tools have spaces for offsets in XYZUVW.
Are you talking about tool.tbl in the config directory? It looks to me like
you can only set tool length
and diameter. Am I missing
On 19 May 2012 02:40, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Anyway, the G10 L2 Px adds an offset from the CURRENT machine position,
Are you sure about that? That isn't what the docs say. G10 L2
shouldn't consider the current position at all, it should simply
define the offset between machine
andy pugh wrote:
On 19 May 2012 02:40, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Anyway, the G10 L2 Px adds an offset from the CURRENT machine position,
Are you sure about that? That isn't what the docs say. G10 L2
shouldn't consider the current position at all, it should simply
29 matches
Mail list logo
