On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
please think through if this sequence sounds generally applicable, and
consider my questions below.
the current flow I am thinking of is this:
pause sequence:
-
if running, and pause command is
Am 08.10.2013 um 12:41 schrieb Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at:
Am 08.10.2013 um 09:07 schrieb Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:19:39 +0200, you wrote:
Reminds me - must be able to toggle spindle off/on during pause.
thats a good point, that would
please think through if this sequence sounds generally applicable, and consider
my questions below.
the current flow I am thinking of is this:
pause sequence:
-
if running, and pause command is issued:
save the position where pause was detected as initial-pause-position
On 10/09/2013 02:02 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
please think through if this sequence sounds generally applicable, and
consider my questions below.
the current flow I am thinking of is this:
pause sequence:
-
if running, and pause command is issued:
save the position
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:19:39 +0200, you wrote:
Reminds me - must be able to toggle spindle off/on during pause.
thats a good point, that would likely also suggest at-speed before reentry if
the spindle is turned on
if we use the offset pose scheme this is how it could work for resume:
Am 08.10.2013 um 09:07 schrieb Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:19:39 +0200, you wrote:
Reminds me - must be able to toggle spindle off/on during pause.
thats a good point, that would likely also suggest at-speed before reentry
if the spindle is turned on
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 18:10:18 -0400, you wrote:
Just keep in mind that for a lathe, Z is not likely to be the
last move of a restore.
Hi Steve, as you probably know Mach has the option to choose, and to set
a safe height. Unfortunately any axis chosen may not be the right one
for that job. I have
Am 07.10.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 18:10:18 -0400, you wrote:
Just keep in mind that for a lathe, Z is not likely to be the
last move of a restore.
Hi Steve, as you probably know Mach has the option to choose, and to set
a safe
On 7 October 2013 03:00, TJoseph Powderly tjt...@gmail.com wrote:
restated: the ToolAxis is an alternative to G17 G18 G19
but it infers the axis that is normal to the path plane,
thats a bit different thinking than G17/18/19
I think that breaks for lathes where arcs are in XZ but the tool
Keyboard jogging during pause now works: http://youtu.be/HNuu_D4X_EM
The HAL jogging pins are removed since not needed anymore. Hitting resume
inserts the return move at the last jog speed.
Integration is pending some work on the underlying joints_axes3 branch. This is
not in enduser-usable
this is great!, could you think adding a pin that defines last
resuming move along an axis (z on a mill as an examlple), to avoid
collisions will be useful?
As cartesian as my brain could think, moves will be:
hit pause
jog(here you have to avoid collisions!)
hit resume
auto move to last x,y
last
Am 06.10.2013 um 23:09 schrieb Ricardo Moscoloni rmoscol...@gmail.com:
this is great!, could you think adding a pin that defines last
resuming move along an axis (z on a mill as an examlple), to avoid
collisions will be useful?
As cartesian as my brain could think, moves will be:
hit
Am 06.10.2013 um 23:09 schrieb Ricardo Moscoloni
rmoscol...@gmail.com:
this is great!, could you think adding a pin that defines last
resuming move along an axis (z on a mill as an examlple), to avoid
collisions will be useful?
As cartesian as my brain could think, moves will be:
Am 07.10.2013 um 00:10 schrieb Steve Stallings steve...@newsguy.com:
Am 06.10.2013 um 23:09 schrieb Ricardo Moscoloni
rmoscol...@gmail.com:
this is great!, could you think adding a pin that defines last
resuming move along an axis (z on a mill as an examlple), to avoid
collisions will
On 10/06/2013 01:34 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Keyboard jogging during pause now works: http://youtu.be/HNuu_D4X_EM
The HAL jogging pins are removed since not needed anymore. Hitting resume
inserts the return move at the last jog speed.
Integration is pending some work on the underlying
On 10/06/2013 04:56 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 06.10.2013 um 23:09 schrieb Ricardo Moscoloni rmoscol...@gmail.com:
this is great!, could you think adding a pin that defines last
resuming move along an axis (z on a mill as an examlple), to avoid
collisions will be useful?
As cartesian
Am 27.09.2013 um 06:37 schrieb Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com:
From: mai...@mah.priv.at
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:16:56 +0200
To: st...@pilotltd.net; emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] JogWhilePaused Proposal
Am 27.09.2013 um 00:57 schrieb Steve
27.09.2013 um 06:37 schrieb Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com:
From: mai...@mah.priv.at
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:16:56 +0200
To: st...@pilotltd.net; emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] JogWhilePaused Proposal
Am 27.09.2013 um 00:57 schrieb Steve Blackmore st
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] JogWhilePaused Proposal
Am 27.09.2013 um 00:57 schrieb Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:20:43 +0200, you wrote:
- changing offsets or tool diameter will NOT be part of the release
targeted work - this is just too many moving parts
On 27 September 2013 08:33, Marius Liebenberg mar...@mastercut.co.za wrote:
Yes man we are still listening although we might not have a clue as to
what you are talking about. It sounds like you have the problem and
solution pretty much under control there.
Step 1) Increase the length of the
On 27 September 2013 07:59, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
- move offset application to motion
This might happen as a natural consequence of the tool-table work.
(I stress, _might_)
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
Step 1) Increase the length of the day to 36 hours to create the
developer time required to do the coding.
I'm thinking that altering the period of the earth's rotation may be
beyond our reach... ;-)
It might be easier for us to figure out how to get rid of that wasteful
sleep thing we all
On 09/27/2013 04:24 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 27 September 2013 08:33, Marius Liebenberg mar...@mastercut.co.za wrote:
Yes man we are still listening although we might not have a clue as to
what you are talking about. It sounds like you have the problem and
solution pretty much under control
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:33:09 +0200, you wrote:
Yes man we are still listening although we might not have a clue as to
what you are talking about. It sounds like you have the problem and
solution pretty much under control there.
Yea - I was lost too :)
In simple language, movement during pause
Hello,
Would like to discuss adoption of JogWhilePaused at Next meeting.
I often need to withdraw the tool from the cut to inspect cutter and
work. Perhaps it began to sound different and make me worry about
cutter. Maybe I see a clamp too close to tool path. I find the
JogWhilePaused a great
On 09/26/2013 01:06 PM, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
Hello,
Would like to discuss adoption of JogWhilePaused at Next meeting.
...
Thanks
TomP ( tjtr33)
More discussion is linked thru GladeVCP Toolchange tag
TomP
I second that. I put it on the agenda for the next meeting. I do agree
that it is very necessary and not just a nice to have. Damn man even
Mach can do it :)
On 2013/09/26 08:10 PM, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
On 09/26/2013 01:06 PM, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
Hello,
Would like to discuss
Marius, Tom -
Am 26.09.2013 um 21:08 schrieb Marius Liebenberg mar...@mastercut.co.za:
TomP
I second that. I put it on the agenda for the next meeting. I do agree
that it is very necessary and not just a nice to have. Damn man even
Mach can do it :)
On 2013/09/26 08:10 PM, TJoseph
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:20:43 +0200, you wrote:
- changing offsets or tool diameter will NOT be part of the release targeted
work - this is just too many moving parts to be realistic to expect.
- changing all UI's to use the new feature may not be realistic to expect
either - only few UI's
Hi all,
I saw this topic and thought hey its been a month or so since someone
complained about this. Many of the requests about the things they want to do
during this pause is unrealistic.
I think the solution is a tool check button that would move a distance away
and turn off the spindle.You
Am 27.09.2013 um 00:57 schrieb Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:20:43 +0200, you wrote:
- changing offsets or tool diameter will NOT be part of the release targeted
work - this is just too many moving parts to be realistic to expect.
- changing all UI's to use
From: mai...@mah.priv.at
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:16:56 +0200
To: st...@pilotltd.net; emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] JogWhilePaused Proposal
Am 27.09.2013 um 00:57 schrieb Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:20:43 +0200, you wrote
32 matches
Mail list logo
