Although I'm pretty much a "lurker" on this list, I have been reading it
daily for 7 or 8 years and can't recall any instances of rudeness,
bullying, or other untoward behavior by anyone. There have been a couple of
instances of someone interjecting a political opinion which was either
silently
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:07 AM andy pugh wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 09:55, Mark wrote:
>
> > Bullshit. It's a sign that someone(s) wants to create political
> > division and strife
>
> No, I think that we can be 100% sure that that was never Jeff's intention.
>
> --
> atp
>
It may not
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 09:55, Mark wrote:
> Bullshit. It's a sign that someone(s) wants to create political
> division and strife
No, I think that we can be 100% sure that that was never Jeff's intention.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the
>> Bullshit. It's a sign that someone(s) wants to create political
>> division and strife
>No, I think that we can be 100% sure that that was never Jeff's intention.
We do not know Jeff's intent since has never commented on this subject.
___
On Tuesday 13 July 2021 07:44:53 Mark Wendt wrote:
> And there are a lot of us who are pretty disgusted with the attitudes
> of those on this list who feel that something like this is totally
> necessary.
>
> Mark
Put me down in that column. I am all for ignoring it, and this list going
back to
And there are a lot of us who are pretty disgusted with the attitudes of
those on this list who feel that something like this is totally necessary.
Mark
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:37 AM Valerio Bellizzomi
wrote:
> I am disgusted by the reactions of detractors of the CoC which Jeff
> proposed,
Anno domini 2021 Tue, 13 Jul 11:03:58 +0100
andy pugh scripsit:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 09:55, Mark wrote:
>
> > Bullshit. It's a sign that someone(s) wants to create political
> > division and strife
>
> No, I think that we can be 100% sure that that was never Jeff's intention.
>
Well,
That's so wrong on so many levels really. Either continue the previous section or throw
up a "Repeated Section" warning or error. If it knows to ignore it then it
also has the ability to do throw up an error.
The LinuxCNC ini format is based on the old Windows ini format, which
also does
On 7/12/21 9:24 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 02:05 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
So forcing CoC on all others is mature behaviour, isn't it?
Nik
yes, it is sign that one cares about the quality of the project.
Bullshit. It's a sign that someone(s) wants to
Most likely not. The pro-CoC would first have to prove that the CoC is not
doing any harm - which is kind of impossible, 'cause it has already caused
harm.
Then - as there is no formal leadership - who may vote? Not to stress the fact
that "somebody" already has forced CoC on others and this
I am disgusted by the reactions of detractors of the CoC which Jeff
proposed, and by being attacked privately like an enemy for my own
freely-shared opinions.
That is why I am going to set digest mode on for the mailing list, so
that I will read messages once every month and not be harassed every
Is it possible to solve this democratically with a vote using something like
Survey Monkey?
Would those passionately for and against accept a democratic decision?
It seems that the fear both for and against supporters of the CofC have of it’s
use (or not) damaging the community is being far
Did I miss an incident that prompted this?
Apparently not. I have asked the same question and nothing has been brought up,
cited, etc.
I have no idea why it was written.
Unless this COC adds more features to LCNC or fixes bugs, does the dishes, or
launders my clothes etc, I am going to
WARNING! The following message does not conform to CoC as it's wordy and
useless.
=
So I got to use that halfway between points operation today.
To set Y=0.0 between the fixed and movable jaws of the vise holding hollow
round stock with my LED indicator 0.2"
14 matches
Mail list logo
