On 1/25/2016 6:28 AM, Peter Blodow wrote:
> Erik,
> better let's be it as it is with metric thread values. If you are
> selling things over here containing non-DIN/ISO threads (and other
> things), you will be liable for all damage that could occur with them in
> ordinary use and you will have to
On 25.01.16 18:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2016 18:34:10 John Figie wrote:
>
> > Why not reference the Machineries Handbook?
> >
> I have a copy of #27. Its been less than Biblical to me.
>
> 1. Hard to find in the index.
>
> 2. Once you THINK you have found the proper
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 10:45 PM, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> So you either have to somehow get a finger on something to provide
> enough drag to force the ratchet to do its job, or you're stuck
> constantly swapping and flipping two different open end wrenches because
> the
On Monday 25 January 2016 22:45:18 Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> On 1/25/2016 6:28 AM, Peter Blodow wrote:
> > Erik,
> > better let's be it as it is with metric thread values. If you are
> > selling things over here containing non-DIN/ISO threads (and other
> > things), you will be liable for all
Erik,
better let's be it as it is with metric thread values. If you are
selling things over here containing non-DIN/ISO threads (and other
things), you will be liable for all damage that could occur with them in
ordinary use and you will have to prove that your threads are just as
good as
On 25.01.16 14:28, Peter Blodow wrote:
> I have run a machine shop with up to twenty workers for 36 years and I
> never heard about percentage of engagement etc.
Peter,
On the 10.2mm hole for M12x1.75, given in the table you posted
yesterday, engagement is 84% - very strong, but hard on taps.
Why not reference the Machineries Handbook?
https://www.google.com/search?q=diyhpl.us+%E2%80%BA+papers2+%E2%80%BA+27_Thread_09A=diyhpl.us+%E2%80%BA+papers2+%E2%80%BA+27_Thread_09A=chrome..69i57.1787j0j4=ms-android-att-us=chrome-mobile=UTF-8
On Jan 25, 2016 4:33 PM, "Peter Blodow"
Erik,
right tomorrow morning I'll copy another table (fine threads) for you,
for today I have had sufficient wine for not attempting (I found a 30
year old bottle this afternoon in our rarely used basement room).
In case you need the size still tonight: the formula: diameter minus
pitch is
As is often the case with data in Machinery’s Handbook, the specific
information one is trying to find is difficult to locate. After many minutes
of scanning I found the tolerances of a class 6H internal metric thread M12 1.5
thread: Minor Diameter - Min:10.376 Max:10.676. So, this says that
On Monday 25 January 2016 18:34:10 John Figie wrote:
> Why not reference the Machineries Handbook?
>
I have a copy of #27. Its been less than Biblical to me.
1. Hard to find in the index.
2. Once you THINK you have found the proper table, the column heading
abbreviations are quite often so
10 matches
Mail list logo