--empyre- soft-skinned space--Dear all,
Jacky, can you tell us more about your video and what you actually mean by
vector video -- watching your Impression of Bimhuis Dance music improv
Lab (http://vimeo.com/99429183), your camera work looks like mine and I
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Dear Johannes, dear all.
On 31 Jul 2014, at 07:12, Johannes Birringer johannes.birrin...@brunel.ac.uk
wrote:
you may recall that Sue Hawksley mentioned her work on physical practices,
her choreographic explorations with dancer Freya
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Dear Johannes,
Thank you, it would be great if we could continue the discussion.
I got thinking about my World cup soccer piece 'Intimate Irrelevant Moments'
jackysawatzky.net/single_cappuccino/ and the relationship it has to this
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Dear all,
last day of July has come, and, thanks to Jacky, we are suddenly on to sports
and a quite fascinating subject regarding the current era of
technological reproducibility of the aura of high performance, or as you argue
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Dear all
something in that probably they are interested
dQ14 Dancing in SPACE
http://www.unistra.fr/index.php?id=19773tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=14651tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=9311cHash=d2c7212c525a015d20eed874cafb2596
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Dear Johannes, et. al,
Thanks for your response. You’ve picked up on one of the issues I’ve been
wrestling with the past few years as a creative practitioner (artist?)
functioning within traditional research-led universities. The
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
dear all:
[Kirk schreibt]
I’m sorry I’ve not been able to participate in real-time, but I have found
inspiration in many of the comments several days after they were written.
understandably, and as pointed out at the end of the June
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hi Johannes and all,
I am always happy for the work to be questioned, I find the most exciting
new perspectives can be often be synthesised from the process.
Wireless-Fidelity is really grappling with a popular relational distance to
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Thanks Wes,
Personally I find your small gesture resonant in a number of ways, but
this is (also) largely a question of sensibilities. The sensible,
perceptible, crafting of otherwise hidden data to bring it into my
sensorium feels
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
dear all
[Kirk schreibt]
it’s interesting to look at it from the perspective of Simon’s question,
“does virtual embodiment depend on, augment or replace bodily practices?”. Of
course we can claim this piece augments current bodily
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Thanks Wes for picking up on the prompt! I think your reflection on opaque
ownership/ hidden ideologies of physical network structure that can be
artistically foregrounded, as in your use of sound, offers the beginnings
of an answer to
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Hello all,
Please accept my apologies for not being able to join this discussion from the
beginning of the month. I’ve only been able to follow this week, spurned on by
Sally Jane, very graciously forwarding what she’s written about
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hi all,
I've been following the fascinating discussion this month with much
interest - as Sally Jane pointed out it is quite relevant to my recent
work. The piece she mentioned is called Wireless-Fidelity (and can be seen
in action here:
--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hi Johannes, all
We were using the notion of tessellation in the computer graphics sense, to
see how we might implement and shape mixed reality boundaries to convey
compelling corporeal experience. The example/ experiment we were engaged
--empyre- soft-skinned space--sorry, didn't mean to push send yet - winding up below
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:06 AM, sally jane norman
normansallyj...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Johannes, all
We were using the notion of tessellation in the computer graphics sense,
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
dear all, Hellen, Sally Jane
thanks for these responses -- and I hope others will join in and partake ---
probably I need to say here, Hellen, that of course I have the utmost respect
for your work
and long time pioneering performances
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
dear all
John asked about the scope of interactive systems, as we generally refer to
such when we build them for a performance or an installation, and yes to that
extent
the scope is limited to artistic /social interactional ventures of
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
dear all
thanks to these discussions over the past week..
I was in Madrid at the METABODY workshop, a European collaborative performance
project, and could not quite participate due to our work-
schedule but read the postings by
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
What is the scope or meaning of 'interaction' when Quantum suggests that any
'change' anywhere affects all 'things' everywhere simultaneously?
jh
--
++
Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD
--empyre- soft-skinned space--What's are 'things' when everything is affected by interaction with everything
else? Quantum Physics renders meaning, and things (and therefore relations),
fugitive.
best
Simon
On 21 Jul 2014, at 08:01, John Hopkins
--empyre- soft-skinned space--that's not what quantum mechanics says.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM, John Hopkins jhopk...@neoscenes.net
wrote:
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
What is the scope or meaning of 'interaction' when Quantum
21 matches
Mail list logo
