Dear empyreans,
Thank you for the discussion. I have been in enjoying its queer turns
and scaling effects, stretching out on the multiple planes of ontology,
shrinking down to the nano. Drink this. Eat this. I can't get off this
chair!
I would like to add this text for its pertinence, less
On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Simon Biggs wrote:
But Kosuth's chair engaged the simulacra - it addressed conventional notions
of the real as not sustainable. Kosuth's chair is an equivocal chair, a fuzzy
chair, all types of chair - and never a chair. It's a conundrum, and that was
the
Hi---each entity (a thought, an amethyst geode, a bartender) emits spacetime
just as Einstein argued . Graham's The Quadruple Object and my not yet out
Realist Magic go into this.
Each entity times in the way Heidegger reserves for Da-sein and Derrida
reserves to the trace.
Time and space
Thank you Ricardo, Elle and Heather for the introductions to your work.
I'm very interested in developing this conversation more to try to
consider the intersections of queer and bio/nano/materialisms. Do you
think of your engagements with new media as queer? How so? Also, do
you think of your
Hi Simon,
As I'm sure you know, Kosuth's essay Art After Philosophy seemed to imply a
platonic solution to that conundrum. His essay claims what's important about
chairs (and art) is the unique idea conveyed to us by their varying
manifestations, whether dictionary definition, photo, or wooden
Hi Ian
Maybe I'm a little old, but 10 to 15 years seems, in terms of human thought,
extremely recent. I have read some OOO texts though, during that short period
of time. I've also had a little time to digest Kosuth's work, since it was made
forty odd years ago. In retrospect his chairs might
I have an article that I wrote about a year ago which discusses black
boxes, poetics, and default settings: Inside Out of the Box: Default
Settings and Electronic Poetics
http://www.dichtung-digital.org/2010/heckman/heckman.htm
It might be a nice complement to the conversation.
I will take a
Thanks for this Rob. It makes a lot of senseWhat is coming with art
after philosophy but again will be interesting. What do you think of the
queer stuff we have been viewing and discussing int his regard? Patricia
From:
Simon, this conversation is a fool's bargain and I refuse to continue it. You
suggest that what is worth doing—but not even doing, just reading, even—only
*will have been* worthwhile after enough time has passed that it can be judged
on the historical scale. This gambit amounts to a rationalist
I apologize in advance for posting this.
But is there a reason this email list withholds messages for many hours and
then distributes them all in a burst? Is every message being moderated? If so
why? If not, what's going on?
No other mailing list to which I subscribe operates in this manner.
Dear Simon,
OOO objects are far more fuzzy than your metaphysically present fuzz. They are
ontologically fuzzy.
To say fuzzy things are better than smooth things--this is just aesthetic
ideology run mad.
Tim
http://www.ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com
On Jun 26, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Ian
Thanks for this Davin. I have it queued up. Tim
http://www.ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com
On Jun 27, 2012, at 3:53 AM, davin heckman davinheck...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an article that I wrote about a year ago which discusses black
boxes, poetics, and default settings: Inside Out of the
Yes, every message is moderated to facilitate dialog and filter out
announcements, etc.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Ian Bogost ian.bog...@lcc.gatech.edu wrote:
I apologize in advance for posting this.
But is there a reason this email list withholds messages for many hours and
then
Thank you to pinar for your post too! Sorry I didn't see it until today!
I hope you all can chime in about these questions before the week/month ends.
cheers,
micha
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:00 AM, micha cárdenas mmcar...@usc.edu wrote:
Thank you Ricardo, Elle and Heather for the
On 06/27/2012 11:07 AM, Robert Jackson wrote:
Hi All,
It's worth noting that Kosuth was a conceptual artist who explicitly
followed in the lineage of Duchamp and the 'demonstration' of idea: that
is to say, the conceptual delivery of art as information and
the separation of 'art' from
The no-future future is definitely something that lays heavy on me, as a
person and as a thinker, especially as it relates to what you call the
'nanocaust' with its differential racial/class distributions over this
earth. it seems precisely at the level of the nano that these struggles are
being
Thank you Heather,
Your question how do we think of the human reaching beyond the human? is of
great importance to me.
I want to quote Elizabeth Grosz here , who is a big influence for me and my
project .
What is distinctively human in the humanities if man is again, in the light of
Darwin's
Hi Rob,
Lots of artists and musicians are now tuning into OOO.
You wrote:
The object in itself being accessible as simply the sum of its unique (fnarr)
aesthetic properties valenced in terms of their efficacy at reflecting the ego
of the gentlemanly spectator is a vision of OOO that would
18 matches
Mail list logo
