> > he have to "cvs add" it, not available in some cases (anoncvs).
>
> He's a developer. He doesn't use anoncvs.
>
> > Also, having an weird interface that nobody uses it make it suck,
> > see?
>
> Sorry, but there's nothing weird about "diff -Nu" since it's exactly
> the same options normal
On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 09:13:38 (+0200),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> he have to "cvs add" it, not available in some cases (anoncvs).
He's a developer. He doesn't use anoncvs.
> Also, having an weird interface that nobody uses it make it suck,
> see?
Sorry, but there's nothing we
On Dec 7, 2007 5:27 AM, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 04:11:54 (+0200),
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> > to avoid this copies, just diff -ur /dev/null your-new-file >> patch,
> > CVS sucks, I know :-P
>
> cvs diff -Nu works just fine. Ignoranc
On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 05:01:11 (+0100),
Dave Andreoli wrote:
> and then create the patch and after cvs remove without cvs commit?
> I have understand right?
No need to remove unless you want to make subsequent commits from that
tree without commiting that particular change. But then, y
No reason to cvs remove. Just leave the file there. You can cvs update
with new files added. In order to use cvs diff -Nu you have to cvs add
the file first. Otherwise cvs doesn't know it's a new file.
dan
On 6-Dec-07, at 11:01 PM, Dave Andreoli wrote:
>
>
>> Just cvs add the file first.
>>
> Just cvs add the file first.
> dan
and then create the patch and after cvs remove without cvs commit?
I have understand right?
If so seems better
cvs diff -Nu
Dave
On 6-Dec-07, at 10:27 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 04:11:54 (+0200),
> Gustavo Sverzut Ba
Just cvs add the file first.
dan
On 6-Dec-07, at 10:27 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 04:11:54 (+0200),
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> to avoid this copies, just diff -ur /dev/null your-new-file >> patch,
>> CVS sucks, I know :-P
>
> cvs diff -Nu works just
On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 04:11:54 (+0200),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> to avoid this copies, just diff -ur /dev/null your-new-file >> patch,
> CVS sucks, I know :-P
cvs diff -Nu works just fine. Ignorance of CVS does not cause *it* to
suck.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. Kai
On Dec 6, 2007 4:56 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status.
> I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje
> (bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready
> to be committed to the edje cvs, but I d
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2007-12-06 12:43:10 -0800
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
edvi http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/edvi.log
engage http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/engage.log
epdf
This is great. I've had this on my plate for a while but haven't done
it for two reasons. 1) no time and 2) while I was doing the first 3
the header and stylesheet were still in flux so I didn't want to go
too far.
Everything seems to have settled for the website so I think now is a
good t
As discussed in IRC I'm going to update all the doxy in cvs.
I will make all looks like the engrave one, with
an updated head that reflect correctly the current site.
I will update this modules:
imlib2
eet
evas
ecore
edje
epeg
epsilon
ewl
etk
emotion
engrave
efreet
If someone don't agree please
Hi all,
Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status.
I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje
(bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready
to be committed to the edje cvs, but I didn't get any devs
opinion :(
In brief: the patch add the ability to modi
> One thing that isn't really dome in e, but could be, is to
> let edjes that correspond to backgrounds provide 'large&small'
> thumbs in the edje itself.. ie. have two additional groups, say
> "thumb_large" and "thumb_small", that give a (tweened) image
> representation of the thumnailed ma
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Saturday, 01 December 2007, at 10:39:49 (+0100),
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> Albin Tonnerre (aka Lutin) requested configure scripts to fail when
>> an option is requested with --enable-*, but the dependancies are not
>> met.
>>
>> Albin wrote a pa
15 matches
Mail list logo
