On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:13:02 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> said:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > Let's put some goal for the coming release of EFL 1.8. It is clearly
>> > not yet ready for
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's put some goal for the coming release of EFL 1.8. It is clearly
> not yet ready for a release and I know that we have still a few
> features we want to push in. I would say that having one month or so
> to push those and t
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:41:02 -0300 Rafael Antognolli
said:
> Great!
>
> I was expecting this since some time already... and 1st of May seems a
> good date.
>
> What about writing down the plan for this release somewhere (phab)?
phab is better than that.. .it has a countdown:
https://phab.enli
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:13:02 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Let's put some goal for the coming release of EFL 1.8. It is clearly
> > not yet ready for a release and I know that we have still a few
> > features we want to
Great!
I was expecting this since some time already... and 1st of May seems a
good date.
What about writing down the plan for this release somewhere (phab)?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's put some goal for the coming release of EFL 1.8. It is clearl
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Let's put some goal for the coming release of EFL 1.8. It is clearly
> not yet ready for a release and I know that we have still a few
> features we want to push in. I would say that having one month or so
> to push those and t
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Lucas De Marchi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > How is this a bug in the compiler?
>> > bla = func_name;
>> > and
>> > bla = var_name;
>>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:43:41 +
>> Daniel Willmann wrote:
>>> as you know we have had Jenkins running and reporting build issues for
>>> almost two weeks now. After initial
Hey guys,
Let's put some goal for the coming release of EFL 1.8. It is clearly
not yet ready for a release and I know that we have still a few
features we want to push in. I would say that having one month or so
to push those and then a one month feature freeze should be good.
So what is your
Cedric Bail
On Mar 20, 2013 10:51 PM, "Michael Blumenkrantz" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Cedric BAIL
> > wrote:
> >
D'ar merc'her 20 a viz Meurzh 2013 e 19 eur 32, « Daniel Willmann » he deus
skrivet :
> On 20/03/13 17:48, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> > On 20/03/13 13:55, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> >> Le mercredi 20 mars 2013 à 14h53, « Daniel Willmann » a écrit :
> >>> On 20/03/13 13:41, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> >
On 20/03/13 17:48, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> On 20/03/13 13:55, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>> Le mercredi 20 mars 2013 à 14h53, « Daniel Willmann » a écrit :
>>> On 20/03/13 13:41, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
Just upgraded to 1GB for temporary files. I still does not understand
what does need mor
On 3/20/13 7:32 AM, oeai wrote:
> On 20/03/13 16:04, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:48:25 + Daniel Willmann
>> said:
>>
>>> On 20/03/13 10:26, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 20/03/13 10:20, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been brought to
On 20/03/13 13:55, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 mars 2013 à 14h53, « Daniel Willmann » a écrit :
>> On 20/03/13 13:41, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>> Just upgraded to 1GB for temporary files. I still does not understand
>>> what does need more than 128MB of space disk for temporary files.
On 20/03/13 13:55, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 mars 2013 à 14h53, « Daniel Willmann » a écrit :
>> On 20/03/13 13:41, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>> can't see any full space disk on the build host, but I should run the
>>> poller more often. I'll maybe add a inotify logger on that dir to
Le mercredi 20 mars 2013 à 14h53, « Daniel Willmann » a écrit :
> On 20/03/13 13:41, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> > Just upgraded to 1GB for temporary files. I still does not understand
> > what does need more than 128MB of space disk for temporary files. I
>
> Thanks.
>
> > can't see any full space
On 20/03/13 13:41, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Just upgraded to 1GB for temporary files. I still does not understand
> what does need more than 128MB of space disk for temporary files. I
Thanks.
> can't see any full space disk on the build host, but I should run the
> poller more often. I'll maybe
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz - Enlightenment Git
>> wrote:
>> > discomfitor pushed a commit to branch master.
>> >
>> > commit 605f781e3608cf17b03a89acab64
Just upgraded to 1GB for temporary files. I still does not understand
what does need more than 128MB of space disk for temporary files. I
can't see any full space disk on the build host, but I should run the
poller more often. I'll maybe add a inotify logger on that dir to trace
this issue on anoth
On 20/03/13 13:30, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> It seems I have spoken too soon...
>
> Unfortunately, the latest reported failure was (again) due to low disk
> space on one of the Jenkins nodes..
>
> See for example:
> http://jenkins.enlightenment.org/view/Overview%20test/job/changely_efl_clang_x86_64/
It seems I have spoken too soon...
Unfortunately, the latest reported failure was (again) due to low disk
space on one of the Jenkins nodes..
See for example:
http://jenkins.enlightenment.org/view/Overview%20test/job/changely_efl_clang_x86_64/ws/src/test-suite.log
A problem I thought and hoped w
On 20/03/13 16:04, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:48:25 + Daniel Willmann
> said:
>
>> On 20/03/13 10:26, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 20/03/13 10:20, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
Hi,
It has been brought to my attention that the git mailing list is
Sorry for the mess
you are very close, I was trying to use arc with a revision composed of
a few commits … didn't end up right, lost my good commit msg too ;((
(I hate a php scipt which emits git push cmds in my back)
my advise to the which will try this:
- have only 1 commit per revision, rewr
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz - Enlightenment Git
> wrote:
> > discomfitor pushed a commit to branch master.
> >
> > commit 605f781e3608cf17b03a89acab64c1daa42ea43a
> > Author: Mike Blumenkrantz
> > Date: Wed Mar 20 0
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz - Enlightenment Git
wrote:
> discomfitor pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit 605f781e3608cf17b03a89acab64c1daa42ea43a
> Author: Mike Blumenkrantz
> Date: Wed Mar 20 08:33:40 2013 +
>
> dear cedric,
>
> fucking compile thing
On 20/03/13 12:06, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> On 20/03/13 11:15, J챕r챕my Zurcher - Enlightenment Git wrote:
>> jeyzu pushed a commit to branch master.
>>
>> commit d0f3357f7778f415f4dae25e2fac4bcc5d1ea8d1
>> Author: Jérémy Zurcher
>> Date: Wed Mar 20 11:45:57 2013 +0100
>>
>> TES
>
> Not the k
On 20/03/13 11:15, J챕r챕my Zurcher - Enlightenment Git wrote:
> jeyzu pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit d0f3357f7778f415f4dae25e2fac4bcc5d1ea8d1
> Author: Jérémy Zurcher
> Date: Wed Mar 20 11:45:57 2013 +0100
>
> TES
Not the kind of commit message I would have expected for a com
looks backportable?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Carsten Haitzler - Enlightenment Git <
[email protected]> wrote:
> raster pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit 9649631c49a46745d7fde8e9d2b75911fd6296e1
> Author: Carsten Haitzler (Rasterman)
> Date: Wed Mar 20 20:06:32 2013
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:48:25 + Daniel Willmann
said:
> On 20/03/13 10:26, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 20/03/13 10:20, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It has been brought to my attention that the git mailing list is
> > laughably
> >> slow, requires manual moderation by our develo
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Jérémy Zurcher - Enlightenment Git <
[email protected]> wrote:
> jeyzu pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit d0f3357f7778f415f4dae25e2fac4bcc5d1ea8d1
> Author: Jérémy Zurcher
> Date: Wed Mar 20 11:45:57 2013 +0100
>
> TES
>
> Conflicts:
On 20/03/13 10:26, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 20/03/13 10:20, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It has been brought to my attention that the git mailing list is
> laughably
>> slow, requires manual moderation by our developers for mails to be sent,
> is
>> administrated by uncooperative/nonresp
On 20/03/13 10:26, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 20/03/13 10:20, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It has been brought to my attention that the git mailing list is laughably
>> slow, requires manual moderation by our developers for mails to be sent, is
>> administrated by uncooperative/nonresponsi
On 20/03/13 10:20, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been brought to my attention that the git mailing list is laughably
> slow, requires manual moderation by our developers for mails to be sent, is
> administrated by uncooperative/nonresponsive unknowns at SF, and thus is
> useless.
>
>
Hi,
It has been brought to my attention that the git mailing list is laughably
slow, requires manual moderation by our developers for mails to be sent, is
administrated by uncooperative/nonresponsive unknowns at SF, and thus is
useless.
At what point do we begin looking for alternatives?
Hello.
On 20/03/13 08:36, Mike Blumenkrantz - Enlightenment Git wrote:
> discomfitor pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit 605f781e3608cf17b03a89acab64c1daa42ea43a
> Author: Mike Blumenkrantz
> Date: Wed Mar 20 08:33:40 2013 +
>
> dear cedric,
>
> fucking compile things bef
On 20/03/13 09:53, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 19/03/13 17:43, Daniel Willmann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> as you know we have had Jenkins running and reporting build issues for
>>> almost two weeks now. After initial hiccups I think it ha
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 19/03/13 17:43, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as you know we have had Jenkins running and reporting build issues for
> > almost two weeks now. After initial hiccups I think it has performed
> > quite well so far. I know of only o
On 19/03/13 17:43, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as you know we have had Jenkins running and reporting build issues for
> almost two weeks now. After initial hiccups I think it has performed
> quite well so far. I know of only one occasion where Jenkins blamed the
> wrong commit for failing (
38 matches
Mail list logo
