btw, this patch does not clean the relcount cleanly.
1. One relcount is still in genlist code.
2. Gengrid depends on relcount still.
Even I am worried that removing relcount will have performance issues
with expandable list, group index, relative item append, and etc, I
just removed the leftovers
Kim Woelders wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:36:17 +0200, Tim Howe wrote:
>
>> This is relevant to graphical Java applications which require it.
>
> Is this the same thing as
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8009224 ?
Heh, it seems to be although I didn't find that bug until
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:36:17 +0200, Tim Howe wrote:
> This is relevant to graphical Java applications which require it.
...
This is a fairly invasive patch in a fairly sensitive area where I haven't
heard of problems in years and where I'm not inclined to make major
changes without good reas
While I mostly agree, I would like to voice my concerns again, but this
time in a public forum. I think we need to write our own SCM in either
Python or C and use that. That's the only way to make sure it suits our
needs...
--
Tom.
On 1 Apr 2013 15:53, "Daniel Willmann" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mo
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:05:51 +1000
David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:35:28 +0100 Daniel Willmann
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:21:06 +0200
> > Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> >
> > > git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb
> > > for most of
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:35:28 +0100 Daniel Willmann
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:21:06 +0200
> Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>
> > git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb
> > for most of you guys, all projects are now splitted, this is a
> > complete unmanageabl
Hello,
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:21:06 +0200
Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb for
> most of you guys, all projects are now splitted, this is a complete
> unmanageable bazar. Why the hell everyone is following Linus
to follow up on this...y
LOL for commit author :D
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> happy April's foo :-D
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>
>> Hi ho sailor,
>>
>> git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb for
>> most of you guys, al
happy April's foo :-D
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Hi ho sailor,
>
> git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb for
> most of you guys, all projects are now splitted, this is a complete
> unmanageable bazar. Why the hell everyone is following
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:21:06 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
actually bzr is just not good enough. i vote we go back to cvs. stuff worked
when we used that!
> Hi ho sailor,
>
> git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb for
> most of you guys, all projects are now splitted,
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:21:05 +0200 Bertrand Jacquin said:
> Hi ho sailor,
>
> git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb for
> most of you guys, all projects are now splitted, this is a complete
> unmanageable bazar. Why the hell everyone is following Linus
> (http://blog.
I fixed the type format and add the description.
The API name..
I think it maybe have more discussion.
For now, I'll let it be.
2013년 4월 1일 월요일에 Daniel Juyung Seo님이 작성:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
>
On 2013-04-01 14:03, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> 2013/3/31 Bertrand Jacquin
>
>> D'ar sul 31 a viz Meurzh 2013 e 21 eur 59, « Bertrand Jacquin » he
>> deus
>> skrivet :
>>> On 2013-03-30 13:57, Davide Andreoli wrote:
Hi,
can someone update the Phabricator Diffusion index page to include
Hi ho sailor,
git is there for about 2 months, and is now prouved to be too dumb for
most of you guys, all projects are now splitted, this is a complete
unmanageable bazar. Why the hell everyone is following Linus
(http://blog.borgnet.us/2005/12/14/linus-calls-gnome-developers-nazis/)
Looking at
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:26:09 +0900
>> > Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> >
>> >> Quick review.
>> >>
>> >>
The other widget which call the function cannot get the object(hit_rect).
So we can not use evas_object_freeze_events_set.
2013년 4월 1일 월요일에 ChunEon Park님이 작성:
> *evas_object_freeze_events_set()
>
>
> -Regards, Hermet-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Ch
2013/3/31 Bertrand Jacquin
> D'ar sul 31 a viz Meurzh 2013 e 21 eur 59, « Bertrand Jacquin » he deus
> skrivet :
> > On 2013-03-30 13:57, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > can someone update the Phabricator Diffusion index page to include all
> > > the
> > > new repos moved to git?
> >
> > I
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:26:09 +0900
> > Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> >
> >> Quick review.
> >>
> >> 1. formatting fix.
> >> 2. api name suggestion.
> >> elm_scrollable_interfa
*evas_object_freeze_events_set()
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "ChunEon Park"
To: "Enlightenment developer list";
"Michael Blumenkrantz";
Cc: ;
Sent: 2013-04-01 (월) 20:54:39
Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/elementary] master 01/
Doesn't evas_object_event_freeze_set() enough?
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Daniel Juyung Seo"
To: "Michael Blumenkrantz";
Cc: ; "Enlightenment developer
list";
Sent: 2013-04-01 (월) 20:45:58
Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/elem
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:26:09 +0900
> Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>
>> Quick review.
>>
>> 1. formatting fix.
>> 2. api name suggestion.
>> elm_scrollable_interface_event_rect_repeat_events_set()?
>
> can we try to avoid api names like this
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:26:09 +0900
Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Quick review.
>
> 1. formatting fix.
> 2. api name suggestion.
> elm_scrollable_interface_event_rect_repeat_events_set()?
can we try to avoid api names like this? in elementary and other libs. super
descriptive api names are pointles
Quick review.
1. formatting fix.
2. api name suggestion.
elm_scrollable_interface_event_rect_repeat_events_set()?
3. add description to eo op description and doxygen.
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jaehwan Kim - Enlightenment Git
wrote:
> jaehwan pushed a com
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:09:19 -0300
Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> Hey guys, could you please do this for me?
And ephoto, please ^_^
-- Igor
--
Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Int
24 matches
Mail list logo
