On Fri, 01 May 2009 11:59:45 +0200 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com
said:
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 10:33 +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 02:02:01 +0200 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com
said:
I've updated the patch with a few fixes and also with sending a
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 10:33 +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 02:02:01 +0200 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com
said:
I've updated the patch with a few fixes and also with sending a message
with all the info that can be used to reproduce the animation (see line
I've updated the patch with a few fixes and also with sending a message
with all the info that can be used to reproduce the animation (see line
249). The question is, how easy would be for a designer to use this info
and create the parallax effect in edje? I don't know embryo that much,
but I
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 21:05 +0800, Toma wrote:
I've updated the patch with a few fixes and also with sending a message
with all the info that can be used to reproduce the animation (see line
249). The question is, how easy would be for a designer to use this info
and create the parallax
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:58 -0300, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing around with the making the bg_object pan on
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:32 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:58 -0300, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:32 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:58 -0300, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
On
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 18:26 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:32 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 18:26 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:32 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:13:28 +0200 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com
said:
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:32 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:58 -0300, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 02:02:01 +0200 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com
said:
I've updated the patch with a few fixes and also with sending a message
with all the info that can be used to reproduce the animation (see line
249). The question is, how easy would be for a designer to use this
Hi,
I've been playing around with the making the bg_object pan on desk
switch, instead of using transitions. To illustrate what I'm talking
about, I made a rather crappy screencast (istanbul only seems to make
10fps screencasts, anyone have an alternative program?):
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing around with the making the bg_object pan on desk
switch, instead of using transitions. To illustrate what I'm talking
about, I made a rather crappy screencast (istanbul only seems to make
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:58 -0300, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Viktor Kojouharov
vkojouha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing around with the making the bg_object pan on desk
switch, instead of using transitions. To illustrate what I'm talking
about,
14 matches
Mail list logo
