On 12/06/12 02:54, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje load: Although we don't use them that much, we have refcounts in evas.
Don't assume an evas_object_del has to delete the object.
Woot ? Why would the sub
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 12/06/12 02:54, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje load: Although we don't use them that much, we have refcounts in
evas.
Don't
On 12/06/12 10:00, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Why would he ? Seriously, nobody should refcount the child of Edje. If
someone does that bad things are going to happen, like this child
could be an external and trigger event in a dead parent for example.
So refcounting the Edje object is fine,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje load: Although we don't use them that much, we have refcounts in evas.
Don't assume an evas_object_del has to delete the object.
Woot ? Why would the sub object of Edje object be refcounted ? Only
On 19/01/12 12:29, David Seikel wrote:
You just broke API. Those %y1 and friends in the strings used by the
_elua_scan_params() and _elua_ret() functions are the names of Lua
arguments and return values. The Lua scripts expect to have these
names as table fields when calling these functions.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:30:31 +0200 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
On 19/01/12 12:29, David Seikel wrote:
You just broke API. Those %y1 and friends in the strings used by
the _elua_scan_params() and _elua_ret() functions are the names of
Lua arguments and return values.
On 19/01/12 14:30, David Seikel wrote:
Well, the API names don't clash at all, since on the C side they only
appear inside strings. The Lua side does not have posix, and the API
names are namespaced in tables anyway, so no clash there either.
Though there is a posix library for Lua, we
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:43:00 +0200 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
There's another big reason for using shadow warnings and that's
removing variables, I almost dismissed this reason myself, but
luckily Gustavo set me straight. For example, lets assume you wrote a
piece of
On 19/01/12 14:56, David Seikel wrote:
In the case of y1, the difference between a function and a variable
will be noticed by the compiler. It will complain anyway. Without
actually looking things up, I suspect the same will apply to index.
True, but that's not the point. The point is
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:01:27 +0200 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
On 19/01/12 14:56, David Seikel wrote:
In the case of y1, the difference between a function and a variable
will be noticed by the compiler. It will complain anyway. Without
actually looking things
On 19/01/12 15:12, David Seikel wrote:
I wonder what other ultra paranoid warnings we will have to fix in
the future? Is there a -Wyou-spelled-edge-wrong-you-dimwit in gcc?
I've been hit by shadow bugs myself, that's why I like the warning, and
others agree.
Actually it was failing at the
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:19:29 +0200 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
On 19/01/12 15:12, David Seikel wrote:
I wonder what other ultra paranoid warnings we will have to fix in
the future? Is there a -Wyou-spelled-edge-wrong-you-dimwit in gcc?
I've been hit by shadow bugs
On 19/01/12 15:29, David Seikel wrote:
Actually, I was only gonna revert the edje_lua2 part, leaving your
edje_util changes as is. That file is someone elses worry, but I don't
think your changes caused any problem there.
Nope, no problem there. I'll re-apply that part once we decide what to
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:29:03 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:19:29 +0200 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
On 19/01/12 15:12, David Seikel wrote:
I wonder what other ultra paranoid warnings we will have to fix
in the future? Is
funny that you still forget the ChangeLog updates
Vincent
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje entry: Fix undo/redo with imf.
Many thanks to Jihoon Kim and SeoZ for reporting this issue.
Author: tasn
Date: 2012-01-03
On 03/01/12 11:58, Vincent Torri wrote:
funny that you still forget the ChangeLog updates
Ah yeah, my bad. I dunno why, I usually remember. In svn, thanks.
--
Tom.
--
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools
Thank you very much :)
2011. 3. 14. 오후 6:19에 Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org님이 작성:
Log:
Edje part-text: Updated docs.
Author: tasn
Date: 2011-03-14 02:19:05 -0700 (Mon, 14 Mar 2011)
New Revision: 57733
Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/57733
Thank you for letting me know about those :)
(Luckily I was bored at the airport).
--
Tom.
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 18:25 +0900, Jihoon Kim wrote:
Thank you very much :)
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and
// need one for markup and format too - how to do it? extra type param?
- static void
+static void __UNUSED__
_text_filter_prepend(Entry *en, const char *text)
what does that use of __UNUSED__ mean ?
Vincent
--
unused function.
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 09:37 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
// need one for markup and format too - how to do it? extra type param?
- static void
+static void __UNUSED__
_text_filter_prepend(Entry *en, const char *text)
what does that use of __UNUSED__ mean ?
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Tom Hacohen wrote:
unused function.
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 09:37 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
// need one for markup and format too - how to do it? extra type param?
- static void
+static void __UNUSED__
_text_filter_prepend(Entry *en, const char *text)
what does
Thanks! It works!
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje: Fixed edje_object_part_text_cursor_content_get to handle non-english.
Thanks to Brian Wang for reporting.
Author: tasn
Date: 2010-08-10 00:16:45 -0700 (Tue, 10
NP, and sorry for the bug :)
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 16:30 +0800, Brian Wang wrote:
Thanks! It works!
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje: Fixed edje_object_part_text_cursor_content_get to handle non-english.
Thanks to Brian
23 matches
Mail list logo
