Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2007-01-16 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 05:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW: Does anyone have any thoughts about an SDL engine? I believe that Cedric had one mostly done and wanted to do further work to bring it up to the current state of evas internals. I am still working on the cache mecanism. I

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2007-01-15 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:30:38 GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: it should be broken if your cvs is up to date - i changed apis for engines. if its not broken compile-time - its going to be broken runtime. :) The build problem here was a pretty simple fix. However,

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2007-01-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be excellent. The many evas engines really need help. fb, dfb, qtopia, xrender, xcb, cairo, opengl, ... need people who know about these in order to efficiently implement various aspects with these engines, to keep up with developments, to fix/improve whatever, etc.

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2007-01-13 Thread Rob Shortt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it should be broken if your cvs is up to date - i changed apis for engines. if its not broken compile-time - its going to be broken runtime. :) The build problem here was a pretty simple fix. However, as you say, the engine api changed so there's probably a lot

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2007-01-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it should be broken if your cvs is up to date - i changed apis for engines. if its not broken compile-time - its going to be broken runtime. :) The build problem here was a pretty simple fix. However, as you say, the engine api changed so there's probably a lot more to do. Are there

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2007-01-11 Thread Rob Shortt
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:11:13 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Monday, 18 December 2006, at 12:11:52 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: yes its probably broken - there is a reason its not enabled by default. dont build it - it has

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2006-12-20 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 18 December 2006, at 12:57:22 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: it should be broken if your cvs is up to date - i changed apis for engines. if its not broken compile-time - its going to be broken runtime. :) I haven't tried to build in probably a week or so. You broke it since

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2006-12-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:41:31 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Monday, 18 December 2006, at 12:57:22 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: it should be broken if your cvs is up to date - i changed apis for engines. if its not broken compile-time - its going to be broken

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2006-12-20 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 21 December 2006, at 11:59:00 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: btw - non default enabled features are liable for breaks. i am adding native colorspace support to engines and this necessitates a lot of changes at the engine api level. i am seriously considering removing engines

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2006-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:03:56 +0200 Ag. System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: yes its probably broken - there is a reason its not enabled by default. dont build it - it has almost no usefulness as nothing i know of needs or uses it. i am considering semi-retiring it until it comes up to

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2006-12-17 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 18 December 2006, at 12:11:52 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: yes its probably broken - there is a reason its not enabled by default. dont build it - it has almost no usefulness as nothing i know of needs or uses it. i am considering semi-retiring it until it comes up to snuff.

Re: [E-devel] evas directfb make error

2006-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:11:13 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Monday, 18 December 2006, at 12:11:52 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: yes its probably broken - there is a reason its not enabled by default. dont build it - it has almost no usefulness as nothing i know