Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 24/09/16 02:59, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 22/09/16 00:34, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 19/09/16 23:33, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Sep

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 24/09/16 10:07, marcel-hollerb...@t-online.de wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:59:14PM -0700, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> On 22/09/16 00:34, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:24:36 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:10:00 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:10:00 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> [...] >> >> promise/future should be

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:07:16 +0200 marcel-hollerb...@t-online.de said: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:59:14PM -0700, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > > On 22/09/16 00:34, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM,

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:59:14PM -0700, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > On 22/09/16 00:34, Cedric BAIL wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >>> On 19/09/16 23:33, Cedric BAIL

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:59:14 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > On 22/09/16 00:34, Cedric BAIL wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >>> On 19/09/16

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:46:36 + Andrew Williams said: > Hi Cedric, > > Great list thanks :) > > Along with all the breaking changes I thought I would throw a suggestion > into the mix... > How about we move non-core Elementary widgets out to an elm_extra library > not

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:14:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:09:01 +0200 Davide Andreoli said: > 2016-09-22 8:55 GMT+02:00 Jean-Philippe André : > > > Hi, > > > > On 22 September 2016 at 15:34, Davide Andreoli > > wrote: > > > > > 2016-09-22 0:45 GMT+02:00 Gustavo

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:10:00 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > [...] > >> promise/future should be first-class citizen... as well as iterator > >> and the likes. There is a start already, but

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:55:33 +0900 Jean-Philippe André said: > Hi, > > On 22 September 2016 at 15:34, Davide Andreoli > wrote: > > > 2016-09-22 0:45 GMT+02:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM,

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:05:57 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > Hello everyone, > > So this email is going over what is left to be done to call EFL > interface done. Most of this require still discussion also. Here it > goes : > > - Merge Eo, Efl and Ecore should we merge libemile

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 22/09/16 00:34, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> On 19/09/16 23:33, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

2016-09-22 8:55 GMT+02:00 Jean-Philippe André : > Hi, > > On 22 September 2016 at 15:34, Davide Andreoli > wrote: > > > 2016-09-22 0:45 GMT+02:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tom Hacohen

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 22/09/16 00:34, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 19/09/16 23:33, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 22/09/16 07:55, Jean-Philippe André wrote: > Hi, > > On 22 September 2016 at 15:34, Davide Andreoli > wrote: > >> 2016-09-22 0:45 GMT+02:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : >> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tom Hacohen >>

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

Hello, On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:33:50PM -0700, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually pretty much > > against it. > > There was a thread weeks ago. You indeed didn't take part of

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 09/22/2016 09:04 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 19/09/16 23:33, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

Hi, On 22 September 2016 at 15:34, Davide Andreoli wrote: > 2016-09-22 0:45 GMT+02:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tom Hacohen > wrote: > > > On 21/09/16 15:10, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

2016-09-22 0:45 GMT+02:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > On 21/09/16 15:10, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tom Hacohen > wrote: > >>

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 19/09/16 23:33, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually pretty much >>> against it. >> >> There was a

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 21/09/16 15:10, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> [...] promise/future should be first-class citizen... as well as iterator and

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

Hi JP, On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Jean-Philippe André wrote: > On 20 September 2016 at 06:05, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> So this email is going over what is left to be done to call EFL >> interface done. Most of this require still discussion also. Here

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 21/09/16 15:10, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > [...] >>> promise/future should be first-class citizen... as well as iterator >>> and the likes. There is a start already, but refinement is really >>> needed, like

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: [...] >> promise/future should be first-class citizen... as well as iterator >> and the likes. There is a start already, but refinement is really >> needed, like returning an iterator should handle warn_unused, free, >>

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 19/09/16 23:33, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually pretty much >> against it. > > There was a thread weeks ago. You indeed didn't take part of that > discussion, but everyone

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On 20/09/16 05:14, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually pretty much >>> against it. >> >>

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

Hi Cedric, On 20 September 2016 at 06:05, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hello everyone, > > So this email is going over what is left to be done to call EFL > interface done. Most of this require still discussion also. Here it > goes : > > - Merge Eo, Efl and Ecore > - Make

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually pretty much >> against it. > > There was a thread weeks ago. You indeed didn't take part

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually pretty much > against it. There was a thread weeks ago. You indeed didn't take part of that discussion, but everyone else involved in that thread was ok. Actually

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

We haven't agreed on merging Eo, Efl and Ecore. I'm actually pretty much against it. Eo is clean and hasn't been "polluted" by async, mainloop and etc. That's a good thing. This makes our infrastructure easier to test. If you mean just compile them together, then there's no point in it. I know why

Re: [E-devel] EFL interface, what's left to be done

Hi Cedric, Great list thanks :) Along with all the breaking changes I thought I would throw a suggestion into the mix... How about we move non-core Elementary widgets out to an elm_extra library not in main efl? There is so much in there that we are struggling to add important stuff like tabs