Hello.
On 03/05/2018 03:21 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o The server is coming up to speed again slowly after our hardware problems
> o No new Coverity results yet, hopefully next week
>
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week on th
Hello.
On 11/21/2017 12:29 PM, Andrew Williams wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thanks for this. The 5 -> 21% build failures is the biggest jump by far, so
> we have a commentary on the cause/issue here?
>
Yeah, I should have commented on that. Its basically due to one of the slave
being down sometimes.
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for this. The 5 -> 21% build failures is the biggest jump by far, so
we have a commentary on the cause/issue here?
Thanks,
Andy
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 at 10:52, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o Been a long time since the last report. But I am back now and should ru
You can't expect me to read that far down in a mail, it's 2017!
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:59 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/28/2017 12:55 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > Hm it looks like enlightenment is not updating again?
>
> See what I wrote in the summary below.
> >
> > On Mon,
Hello.
On 08/28/2017 12:55 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
Hm it looks like enlightenment is not updating again?
See what I wrote in the summary below.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:44 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
Hello.
Summary:
o Some of the Coverity numbers might be outdated ( I know for sure in
Hm it looks like enlightenment is not updating again?
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:44 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o Some of the Coverity numbers might be outdated ( I know for sure in
> case of E)
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> we
Thanks!
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:16 AM Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Tue, 09 May 2017 12:43:39 + Mike Blumenkrantz
> said:
>
> > Hi raster,
> >
> > Can you look at CID1365406 for Enlightenment? I requested this last year
> > and it seems you still have not gotten to it...
>
> forgot about i
On Tue, 09 May 2017 12:43:39 + Mike Blumenkrantz
said:
> Hi raster,
>
> Can you look at CID1365406 for Enlightenment? I requested this last year
> and it seems you still have not gotten to it...
forgot about it... sorry.
but really. it's not a bug. it's coverity being... coverity. :)
> On
Hi raster,
Can you look at CID1365406 for Enlightenment? I requested this last year
and it seems you still have not gotten to it...
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:08 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o A few more bug reports and a few more new patches, nothing else really.
>
> This sho
On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:28:14 + Mike Blumenkrantz
said:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:12 AM Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Summary:
> > o First Coverity reports coming in again (EFL is still the old build)
> >
> >
> > This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:12 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o First Coverity reports coming in again (EFL is still the old build)
>
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week on the QA front. The numbers in parentheses reflect the values f
Hello.
On 03/11/16 06:54, Daniel Zaoui wrote:
> Oooo... After more investigation, it more seems that exactness data
> repository is not updated in the server.
>
> Now, I have to convince you to update Exactness repos.
It gets updated every build but it was building from a different branch.
Oooo... After more investigation, it more seems that exactness data
repository is not updated in the server.
Now, I have to convince you to update Exactness repos.
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 07:38:54 +0200
Daniel Zaoui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you guys to have brought Jenkins/Exactness back to lif
Hi,
Thank you guys to have brought Jenkins/Exactness back to life.
I checked the screenshots and it seems to be some issue with fonts, kind of
freetype is not the last version. Can you tell me which version you are using
there and how I can convince you to upgrade it :-) ?
Thanks
JackDanielZ
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:34:39 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/08/16 16:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:08:58 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On 08/08/16 15:35, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 8 Aug
Hello.
On 08/08/16 16:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:08:58 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> said:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 08/08/16 15:35, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:31:06 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
>>> said:
>>>
Hello.
Summ
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:08:58 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/08/16 15:35, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:31:06 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> Summary:
> >> o Coverity updated their analyzer side so we got a bunch new defe
Hello.
On 08/08/16 15:35, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:31:06 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> said:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Summary:
>> o Coverity updated their analyzer side so we got a bunch new defects
>> o On the other hand a lot of them got fixed already :)
>> o Mike, yes
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:31:06 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o Coverity updated their analyzer side so we got a bunch new defects
> o On the other hand a lot of them got fixed already :)
> o Mike, yes there is a new one in E. Build is from 04.08 :)
>
>
> This should give ever
Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:12 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 18/07/16 16:59, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > Can we stop including counts for projects which haven't successfully
> built
> > in the past 1-2 weeks? Every time this goes out I go to check the build
> and
> > sit the
Can we stop including counts for projects which haven't successfully built
in the past 1-2 weeks? Every time this goes out I go to check the build and
sit there scratching my head until I notice it hasn't built since last
month.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:28 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
Hello.
On 18/07/16 16:59, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Can we stop including counts for projects which haven't successfully built
> in the past 1-2 weeks? Every time this goes out I go to check the build and
> sit there scratching my head until I notice it hasn't built since last
> month.
I always
Hello.
On 18/07/16 14:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o New Coverity run is delayed
New run for EFL is done now. 43 issues fixed and 4 new reported.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can
Thanks for this.
I am confused about the results page. It claims there are 12 defects
outstanding, but there are zero unresolved defects available in the list.
Is there more information available?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:16 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 22/03/16 08:31, Stefan Schmi
Hello.
On 22/03/16 08:31, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 21/03/16 16:26, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> The Enlightenment build hasn't updated in over a week; the page says that
>> something is not configured. Are you aware of this?
> The not fully configured part is something you can ignore h
Hello.
On 21/03/16 16:26, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> The Enlightenment build hasn't updated in over a week; the page says that
> something is not configured. Are you aware of this?
The not fully configured part is something you can ignore here. We do
not have components setup neither a modeling
The Enlightenment build hasn't updated in over a week; the page says that
something is not configured. Are you aware of this?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:43 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o The first time in about 10 weeks that our bug count did decrease
> instead of increase
>
>
Hello.
I replied to your original mail with the subject enlightenment systems.
Just as a reference here is the quote:
Its great to hear that you have interested in helping out with it!
Beber (cc'ed) handles our systems and he would be the one you should
talk to.
He is also in Europe so the ti
Would love to help out with infrastructure. I sent a reply to another
email thread about looking for help but got no response.
On 2016-03-07 16:13, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/03/16 16:04, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>
>> Is there anyone else who actively works on maintaining jenkins
Hello.
On 07/03/16 16:30, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> What's actually required for this? Is it code-related or just
> infrastructure?
Its a mixture of things. Sometimes its code related sometimes you have
to find out why it only fails on Jenkins and not on your local host.
Some sort of detective
What's actually required for this? Is it code-related or just
infrastructure?
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:15 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/03/16 16:04, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > Is there anyone else who actively works on maintaining jenkins builds? Do
> > we need to try getting mo
Hello.
On 07/03/16 16:04, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Is there anyone else who actively works on maintaining jenkins builds? Do
> we need to try getting more people on that?
>
Nope, nobody else on Jenkins jobs. Beber handles the server system side
but that is all.
I'm actually trying to get more
Is there anyone else who actively works on maintaining jenkins builds? Do
we need to try getting more people on that?
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:02 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/03/16 15:52, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > It seems somewhat pointless to continue reporting Enlightenment
Hello.
On 07/03/16 15:52, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> It seems somewhat pointless to continue reporting Enlightenment defects;
> Coverity hasn't updated anything there since January.
>
Because our nightly builds (and not only those) have been failing for
almost all February. One can clearly see t
It seems somewhat pointless to continue reporting Enlightenment defects;
Coverity hasn't updated anything there since January.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:36 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o 9 new Coverity defects in EFL. If you added something last week please
> have a look.
> o
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:13:11 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 29/02/16 16:52, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > Your continued mails have motivated me. As of this moment,
> > Enlightenment now has 0 defects reported.
>
> That is really great to hear! Thanks a lot for this work!
Zarro boo
Hello.
On 29/02/16 16:52, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Your continued mails have motivated me. As of this moment, Enlightenment
> now has 0 defects reported.
That is really great to hear! Thanks a lot for this work!
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
Your continued mails have motivated me. As of this moment, Enlightenment
now has 0 defects reported.
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:35 AM Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o Our bug count is still increasing and about to reach 800 open issues
>
>
> This should give everyone an overview ov
Hello.
On 11/01/16 13:57, Boris Faure wrote:
> On 16-01-11 11:35, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> o Terminology: Outstanding defects 3 (0) with a density of 0.04 (0)
> Those issues should be fixed now.
>
There is still a build for Terminology pending. Most likely it will
contain your fixes and they wil
On 16-01-11 11:35, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> o Terminology: Outstanding defects 3 (0) with a density of 0.04 (0)
Those issues should be fixed now.
--
Boris Faure
Pointer Arithmetician
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello.
On 23/11/15 11:02, Boris Faure wrote:
> On 15-11-23 10:44, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Summary:
>> o Almost 20 new coverity defects in EFL. I you recently added new code
>> here please check if they come from you.
> From my experience on Terminology, it seems Coverity changed/imp
On 15-11-23 10:44, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o Almost 20 new coverity defects in EFL. I you recently added new code
> here please check if they come from you.
From my experience on Terminology, it seems Coverity changed/improved
their analyzer. It now complains when the resul
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:07:00 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/06/15 11:03, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:59:40 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> Summary:
> >> o The reasaon for the jenkins outtake have been some trouble with our fs
> >> a
Hello.
On 08/06/15 11:03, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:59:40 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> said:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Summary:
>> o The reasaon for the jenkins outtake have been some trouble with our fs
>> after the partition was extended. Hopefully things are sorted out now
>> and we
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:59:40 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o The reasaon for the jenkins outtake have been some trouble with our fs
> after the partition was extended. Hopefully things are sorted out now
> and we start to catchup.
what fs problems?
> This should give eve
Hello.
On 18/05/15 09:50, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o New Covertiy issues for EFL and Elm. If you added new code since 1.14
> please have a look if your code has the problems.
> o Outstanding patches reviews reducing
>
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has hap
2014-09-01 12:30 GMT+01:00 Tom Hacohen :
> On 01/09/14 10:36, Boris Faure wrote:
> > On 14-09-01 11:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > […]
> >> Unit tests:
> >> o 326 (399) unit tests for efl and none failing
> >
> > Did we remove a bunch of unit tests?
> >
>
> Yes we did. C++ is now disabled by defaul
On 01/09/14 10:36, Boris Faure wrote:
> On 14-09-01 11:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> […]
>> Unit tests:
>> o 326 (399) unit tests for efl and none failing
>
> Did we remove a bunch of unit tests?
>
Yes we did. C++ is now disabled by default.
--
Tom.
-
Hello.
On 01/09/14 11:36, Boris Faure wrote:
> On 14-09-01 11:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> […]
>> Unit tests:
>> o 326 (399) unit tests for efl and none failing
> Did we remove a bunch of unit tests?
>
I wondered the same. Coverage is still at the same level so we did not
drop tests. Maybe some ha
On 14-09-01 11:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
[…]
> Unit tests:
> o 326 (399) unit tests for efl and none failing
Did we remove a bunch of unit tests?
--
Boris Faure
Pointer Arithmetician
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:42:01 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/18/2014 10:36 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > Why is evas split from EFL in coverity?
> Evas generic loaders and emotion generic players. Just to lazy to
> write it out. Its like this since I first run coverity for them and
>
Hello.
On 08/18/2014 10:36 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Why is evas split from EFL in coverity?
Evas generic loaders and emotion generic players. Just to lazy to write
it out. Its like this since I first run coverity for them and put them
into the weekly report.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
---
Why is evas split from EFL in coverity?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Summary:
> o A lot nuked coverity reports in EFL. Raster got a tiny coverity
> addiction for a few days. :) Good job.
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in t
On 06/01/14 14:41, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 06/01/14 14:19, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 PM, David Seikel wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:31:59 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
>>>
clang scan-build:
o EFL scan-build reports 484 (483) issues.
>>> https:/
On 06/01/14 14:19, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 PM, David Seikel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:31:59 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> clang scan-build:
>>> o EFL scan-build reports 484 (483) issues.
>>>
>> https://build.enlightenment.org/job/nightly_efl_clang_x8
Hello.
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 23:19, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 PM, David Seikel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:31:59 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >
> > > clang scan-build:
> > > o EFL scan-build reports 484 (483) issues.
> > >
> > https://build.enlightenment
Hello.
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 19:21, David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:31:59 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
> > clang scan-build:
> > o EFL scan-build reports 484 (483) issues.
> > https://build.enlightenment.org/job/nightly_efl_clang_x86_64/lastSuccessfu
> > lBuild/artifact/scan-build
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:31:59 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
> > clang scan-build:
> > o EFL scan-build reports 484 (483) issues.
> >
> https://build.enlightenment.org/job/nightly_efl_clang_x86_64/lastSuccessfu
> > lBuild/artifact/scan-build/b
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:31:59 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> clang scan-build:
> o EFL scan-build reports 484 (483) issues.
> https://build.enlightenment.org/job/nightly_efl_clang_x86_64/lastSuccessfu
> lBuild/artifact/scan-build/build/
> o Elementary scan-build reports 121 (119)
Elementary reports
Hello.
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 12:39, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Switch have been done, new build are now run with gcc 4.8.1
Thanks. No fallout so far which is good. :)
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
November Webinars for C, C+
Switch have been done, new build are now run with gcc 4.8.1
On 2013-10-29 09:31, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/28/2013 06:29 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>> Hi in there,
>>
>> Not that next report may give different results as the 1th november,
>> main gcc release will be switch for gc
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Kim Shinwoo
> wrote:
> > Is the test result from efl/src/tests/* stuffs?
>
> Yes, they are !
>
> > The functional (or line) coverage would be lower than I though.
> > It would be a nice point to co
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Kim Shinwoo wrote:
> Is the test result from efl/src/tests/* stuffs?
Yes, they are !
> The functional (or line) coverage would be lower than I though.
> It would be a nice point to contribute on my side. :)
For people who didn't saw those tests coverage
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Kim Shinwoo wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is the test result from efl/src/tests/* stuffs?
> The functional (or line) coverage would be lower than I though.
> It would be a nice point to contribute on my side. :)
>
> Sincerely,
> Shinwoo Kim.
>
>
Yes please Shinwoo.
Welcome y
Hello
Is the test result from efl/src/tests/* stuffs?
The functional (or line) coverage would be lower than I though.
It would be a nice point to contribute on my side. :)
Sincerely,
Shinwoo Kim.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/29/2013 10:50 AM, Cedric
Hello.
On 10/29/2013 10:50 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On 10/29/2013 09:38 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 10/28/2013 06:29 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Not that next repor
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/29/2013 09:38 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2013 06:29 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
Not that next report may give different results as the 1th november,
main
Hello.
On 10/29/2013 09:38 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On 10/28/2013 06:29 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>> Not that next report may give different results as the 1th november,
>>> main gcc release will be switch for gcc 4.8.1.
>>
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 06:29 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>> Not that next report may give different results as the 1th november,
>> main gcc release will be switch for gcc 4.8.1.
>
> Ah, right. Thanks for the reminder.
>
> I'm running one mac
Hello.
On 10/28/2013 06:29 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Hi in there,
>
> Not that next report may give different results as the 1th november,
> main gcc release will be switch for gcc 4.8.1.
Ah, right. Thanks for the reminder.
I'm running one machine with 4.8.1 here so I don't expect to many
p
Hi in there,
Not that next report may give different results as the 1th november,
main gcc release will be switch for gcc 4.8.1.
Beber
On 2013-10-28 12:10, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I skipped last week because I was out of the office and my etup was not
> ready to handle it on the roa
On 10/07/2013 09:34 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 09:25 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> *** Newsflash ***
>> Ne statistical data proves that
>
> ... that you should read through a mail again before sending it.
>
> regards
> Stefan Schmidt
LMAO
dh
--
On 10/07/2013 09:25 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> *** Newsflash ***
> Ne statistical data proves that
... that you should read through a mail again before sending it.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
October Webinars:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> *** Newsflash ***
> New research paper unvails that looking at potential problems early in
> the development and release process cuts down time spent on debugging
> aftterwards. Suggestions have been made that developers should ha
Hello.
On 09/30/2013 01:58 PM, Boris Faure wrote:
> On 13-09-30 13:46, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> *** Newsflash ***
>> New research paper unvails that looking at potential problems early in
>> the development and release process cuts down time spent on debugging
>> aftterwards. Suggesti
On 13-09-30 13:46, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> *** Newsflash ***
> New research paper unvails that looking at potential problems early in
> the development and release process cuts down time spent on debugging
> aftterwards. Suggestions have been made that developers should have a
> look at
Thanks again.
I just fixed newly added two elementary defects.
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit te
Hello.
On 09/05/2013 06:55 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:50:50 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 09/03/2013 08:11 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> Coverity:
>>> o EFL: Outstanding defects 452 (452) with a density of 0.85 (0.85).
>>> 1 defects fixed since last
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:50:50 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 09/03/2013 08:11 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > Coverity:
> > o EFL: Outstanding defects 452 (452) with a density of 0.85 (0.85).
> > 1 defects fixed since last build and 1 added.
> > o Elm: Outstanding defects 20 (20) w
OK Thanks for your effort.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 09/03/2013 08:11 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > Coverity:
> > o EFL: Outstanding defects 452 (452) with a density of 0.85 (0.85). 1
> > defects fixed since last build and
Hello.
On 09/03/2013 08:11 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Coverity:
> o EFL: Outstanding defects 452 (452) with a density of 0.85 (0.85). 1
> defects fixed since last build and 1 added.
> o Elm: Outstanding defects 20 (20) with a density of 0.09 (0.09). 0
> defects fixed since last build and 0 adde
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:13:44 +0100 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit tests and
> coverage as well as all static analyser runs and things like
> address-sanitizer.
Hello.
On 08/19/2013 09:20 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Coverity:
>> o EFL: Outstanding defects 452 (452) with a density of 0.85 (0.85). 0
>> defects fixed since last build and 0 added.
>> o Elm: Outstanding defects 20 (7) with a densit
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit tests and
> coverage as well as all static analyser runs and things like
> address-sanitizer.
>
> Th
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Exactness:
> o The edje exactness builds are working now. Elm exactness still failing.
> o Problems with fonts
> o Still waiting for the first successful run on jenkins
>
> Unit tests:
> o 270 unit tests for efl and none failing
>
>
On 12/08/13 10:58, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/12/2013 10:55 AM, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 12/08/13 09:54, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
>>> week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit
On 12/08/13 09:54, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit tests and
> coverage as well as all static analyser runs and things like
> address-sanitizer.
>
> Many thanks here
On 05/08/13 09:05, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As I never really got feedback on this I wonder if it is useful for
> anyone? So, tell me if you like to have this or better you are actually
> using it as motivation to work on some of the issues. :)
>
> This should give everyone an overview ov
On 05/08/13 09:23, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/05/2013 09:18 AM, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 05/08/13 09:09, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> I read it, I'm just too busy to do anything about it right now.
>>>
>>> YOUR WORK IS APPRECIATED
>>>
>>
>> +1 :)
>>
>> I read them also, and
Hello.
On 08/05/2013 09:18 AM, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 05/08/13 09:09, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> I read it, I'm just too busy to do anything about it right now.
>>
>> YOUR WORK IS APPRECIATED
>>
>
> +1 :)
>
> I read them also, and actually Try to fix Coverity issues (when I find
> the
Hello.
On 08/05/2013 09:09 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> I read it, I'm just too busy to do anything about it right now.
I figured that for the enlightenment part.
> YOUR WORK IS APPRECIATED
Good.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
-
On 05/08/13 09:09, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> I read it, I'm just too busy to do anything about it right now.
>
> YOUR WORK IS APPRECIATED
>
+1 :)
I read them also, and actually Try to fix Coverity issues (when I find
the time).
Please, keep up the good work !!
dh
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at
I read it, I'm just too busy to do anything about it right now.
YOUR WORK IS APPRECIATED
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As I never really got feedback on this I wonder if it is useful for
> anyone? So, tell me if you like to have this or better you are actuall
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:16:44 +0100 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit tests and
> coverage as well as all static analyser runs and things like
> address-sanitizer.
Hello.
On 07/05/2013 06:39 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> I just requested access permission on coverity website.
Approved everyone in the queue this morning. If there are people that
requested access but are not approved yet holler now. I had problems
with the website before not showing me all
I just requested access permission on coverity website.
I hope I can contribute fixing more bugs.
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/04/2013 11:57 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:05:12 +0100 Stefan Schmid
Hello.
On 07/04/2013 11:57 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:05:12 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Grumbl. Seems my hand is faster in hitting send than my brain in
>> telling my hand to hit save.
>>
>> I just started this and it was supposed to go out on Monday. To late
>> now it
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:05:12 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/04/2013 09:53 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the
> > last week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit tests
> > and coverage as wel
Hello.
On 07/04/2013 09:59 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Thanks for the report! Very useful.
>
> All that's left now is to actually fix the issues. :)
I delegate this tiny part of the job to you. :)
regards
Stefan Schmidt
-
Hello.
On 07/04/2013 09:53 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last
> week regarding our continuous integration builds, unit tests and
> coverage as well as all static analyser runs and things like
> address-sanitizer.
>
> CI:
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
