On Saturday, 05 April 2003, at 17:40:50 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
> >Setup-gettext should have been installed by typing ./setup-gettext
> >--install. Somewhere after AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in, place
> >the line:
> >AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION(0.10.40)
> >
> >(The version number can really be an
Christian Hammond wrote:
Setup-gettext should have been installed by typing ./setup-gettext
--install. Somewhere after AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in, place
the line:
AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION(0.10.40)
(The version number can really be anything, in my experience. It just
wants the macro to exist)
Than
Hall Stevenson wrote:
How come no one ran into the "bugs" before ?? :)
Do I sense a trick question here?
Anyway, one explanation is as follows:
The last two small patches fix bugs that you would experience only if
1) you were playing with E16 from CVS.
2) had an external non-WM application that a
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:57:37PM +0200, Kim Woelders wrote:
> Michael Jennings wrote:
> >raster (and others): If you have a moment, please update e16/e and
> >make sure "make distcheck" still passes for you as well (after running
> >autogen.sh, obviously).
>
> $ ./autogen.sh
> I am going to run
* Kim Woelders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030402 18:29]:
> What can I say...
How come no one ran into the "bugs" before ?? :)
Hall
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No ot
Michael Jennings wrote:
raster (and others): If you have a moment, please update e16/e and
make sure "make distcheck" still passes for you as well (after running
autogen.sh, obviously).
$ ./autogen.sh
I am going to run ./configure with no arguments - if you wish
to pass any to it, please specify t
What can I say...
This one gets _NET_DESKTOP_GEOMETRY set correctly when the desktop size
is changed.
/Kim
diff -ur -X excl-cvs.list e16-cvs.org/e/src/hints.c e16/e/src/hints.c
--- e16-cvs.org/e/src/hints.c 2003-03-28 06:16:16.0 +0100
+++ e16/e/src/hints.c 2003-04-03 00:35:53.000
On Monday, 31 March 2003, at 14:03:26 (-0800),
Christian Hammond wrote:
> Yeah, gettext is definitely crap, but what about the setup-gettext
> script I wrote that was put into e17? (I don't know if it's still
> there, actually?) It was designed for the gaim project, as we had
> many people all usi
Hi again,
Yet another patch. This one sets the _NET_DESKTOP_VIEWPORT
hint correctly (one coordinate set per desktop).
/Kim
diff -ur -X excl-cvs.list e16-cvs.org/e/src/ewmh.c e16/e/src/ewmh.c
--- e16-cvs.org/e/src/ewmh.c2003-03-31 20:47:24.0 +0200
+++ e16/e/src/ewmh.c2003-04-02 22:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:35:36PM -0500, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 March 2003, at 23:03:06 (+0200),
> Kim Woelders wrote:
>
> > Here is yet another set of small patches for E16:
>
> Should be in CVS now.
>
> > I am having a lot of noise and trouble with the auto*
> > stuff again.
On Sunday, 30 March 2003, at 23:03:06 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
> Here is yet another set of small patches for E16:
Should be in CVS now.
> I am having a lot of noise and trouble with the auto*
> stuff again. "gettextize -f" (output attached) removes
> and modifies things that are in CVS (e.g
Hi again,
Here is yet another set of small patches for E16:
e16-ewmh-handle-vp-change.patch implements handling of
_NET_DESKTOP_VIEWPORT client messages.
e16-move-iconfied-window.patch moves (unsticky) iconfied
windows when the viewport is moved on a desktop (just
like non-iconfied unsticky windo
Hi there,
Please find attached various minor patches for E16, more
or less related to the Extended Window Manager Hints:
e16-fix-initial-desktop.patch initialises the desktop for
a new window to the current desktop. This avoids that
DetermineEwinArea() called from AddToFamily() accesses
desks.desk
On Friday, 21 March 2003, at 23:36:11 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
> Yet another version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
> http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenment-0.16-cvs-ewmh-kw8.patch
> This is a patch on the current CVS version. It applies nicely to the
> 0.16.5 source
* Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030322 03:34]:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:14:28 -0700 Bob Arendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > Are any major Linux distro's including imlib2 as part of their
> > distributions? I rather like being able to build e16 without
> > having to build a lot of t
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:14:28 -0700 Bob Arendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Are any major Linux distro's including imlib2 as part of their
> distributions? I rather like being able to build e16 without
> having to build a lot of the infrastructure as well.
> -Bob Arendt
this (in theory) is a g
On Wednesday, 19 March 2003, at 23:38:58 (-0500),
BAM wrote:
> Just for the record, I've tried this with automake 1.4/autoconf 2.13
> and it looks OK. If somebody with a distro that actually uses these
> could test it, that would be great, though.
It appears to be fine. The current problems I'm
BAM wrote:
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 15:57, Kim Woelders wrote:
Yet another version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenment-0.16-cvs-ewmh-kw7.patch
This is a patch on the current CVS version. It applies nicely to the
0.16.5 source tarball.
Chang
Kim Woelders wrote:
Hi again,
[snip]
I'll try to keep quiet a while now :-)
/Kim
[snip]
Please don't. I'm really excited to see a maintenance release coming
out for e.16. If you find something else, please make lots of noise ;-)
--
Robert G. Werner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001/9/11
Lots of people
Hi again,
Yet another version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenment-0.16-cvs-ewmh-kw8.patch
This is a patch on the current CVS version. It applies nicely to the
0.16.5 source tarball.
Changes since -kw7:
- Collect GNOME hint processing in
Hi there,
Yet another version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenment-0.16-cvs-ewmh-kw7.patch
This is a patch on the current CVS version. It applies nicely to the
0.16.5 source tarball.
Changes since -kw6:
- The epplets use GNOME hints to s
I was under the impression that this move would actually minimise the
infrastructure since imlib2 would take over the role of fnlib as well.
And you don't need the edb or xcf loaders, so really, just build imlib2
and e16.
-James
Bob Arendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Are any major Linux dist
--Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Jennings
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: e
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] While we await E17...
>
>
> On Friday, 21 March 2003, at 11:19:54 (-0500),
> Hall S
On Friday, 21 March 2003, at 11:19:54 (-0500),
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> I'll bet that none of the primary developers are interested in doing
> this as they're busy with e17. Even if you volunteer and do a good
> job, they may not want to update the "old" version now.
>
> I'm curious what Rasterman
Bob Arendt wrote:
> James Moss wrote:
>> On the subject of features/fixes going in to e16, don't suppose anyone
>> has thought about moving e16 to imlib2? I know it's in the TODO for
>> e16... any thoughts? I'd be interested in helping out with this.
>> -James
>>
>
> Are any major Linux dis
This would actually reduce infrastructure, or at least I'm under the
(mis)belief that it does. Imlib2 would take over the role of not only
imlib1 but fnlib as well. You don't need edb or xcf loaders for e16, so
you don't need to build edb itself or the extra loaders. So, unless I'm
missing somet
> Are any major Linux distro's including imlib2 as part of their
> distributions?
Mandrake 9.0 (so I would presume the new 9.1), Gentoo, Debian (unstable),
Yellow Dog. Red Hat 8.0 does not have it.
Since both Mandrake and Debian have it, that seems to cover the two major
package formats...
Mik
At 10:14 AM 3/21/2003 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote:
James Moss wrote:
On the subject of features/fixes going in to e16, don't suppose anyone
has thought about moving e16 to imlib2? I know it's in the TODO for
e16... any thoughts? I'd be interested in helping out with this.
-James
Are any major Lin
Are any major Linux distro's including imlib2 as part of their
distributions? I rather like being able to build e16 without
having to build a lot of the infrastructure as well.
-Bob Arendt
James Moss wrote:
On the subject of features/fixes going in to e16, don't suppose anyone
has thought about m
At 10:57 AM 3/21/2003 -0500, James Moss wrote:
Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:26:53 -0800 "Robert G. Werner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner"
> > > <[EMAIL
On the subject of features/fixes going in to e16, don't suppose anyone
has thought about moving e16 to imlib2? I know it's in the TODO for
e16... any thoughts? I'd be interested in helping out with this.
-James
Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:26:53 -0800
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:47:14 -0500 Michael Jennings babbled:
>On Wednesday, 19 March 2003, at 17:52:00 (+0100),
>Kim Woelders wrote:
>
>
>>Here is a new version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
>>http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenmen
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 11:52, Kim Woelders wrote:
> The patch also includes BAM<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s fix to configure.in to get
> auto* going.
Just for the record, I've tried this with automake 1.4/autoconf 2.13 and
it looks OK. If somebody with a distro that actually uses these could
test it, that
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:47:14 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday, 19 March 2003, at 17:52:00 (+0100),
> Kim Woelders wrote:
>
> > Here is a new version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
> > http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenment-0.16-cvs-ewmh-k
* Michael Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030319 18:15]:
> On Wednesday, 19 March 2003, at 17:52:00 (+0100),
> Kim Woelders wrote:
>
> Is there a problem with the 0.16.5 tarball? If so, I'd like to get
> that corrected. If it's related to newer auto* tools, though, I won't
> bother.
>
> > The pat
On Wednesday, 19 March 2003, at 17:52:00 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
> Here is a new version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
> http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenment-0.16-cvs-ewmh-kw6.patch
> This is a patch on the current CVS version.
>
> It applies nicely to the 0.16.5
Hi there,
Here is a new version of the Extended Window Manager Hints patch:
http://www.woelders.dk/~kw/stuff/e16/enlightenment-0.16-cvs-ewmh-kw6.patch
This is a patch on the current CVS version.
It applies nicely to the 0.16.5 source tarball. If you patch the
tarball, you should probably also appl
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:26:53 -0800 "Robert G. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> [snip]
> >>Also, Could someone include the patch so e.16 builds with freetype 2
On Monday, 17 March 2003, at 15:26:53 (-0800),
Robert G. Werner wrote:
> Actually, I think it still builds against freetype 1, as you
> indicated but it is able to handle the include files the way RH lays
> them out (is it RH that does this or the FT2 lib?). E.16.5 can't
> find the right include
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
[snip]
Also, Could someone include the patch so e.16 builds with freetype 2
(as it installs on RH 7.*)?
there is such a patch? :) its in cvs i believe to build.. but it bui
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> BAM wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 18:53, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Could someone test this with an old autoconf and see if it breaks? More
> > distros have switched to the latest autoconf since th
BAM wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 18:53, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
[snip]
Could someone test this with an old autoconf and see if it breaks? More
distros have switched to the latest autoconf since this was last
discussed, so a lot of people will need something like this.
[snip
Also, Could someone in
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 18:53, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> if it goes ok - lets apply to cvs and maybe roll out a release?
e16 cvs doesn't work with autoconf 2.5x (autoheader fails). This patch
is just enough to make it compile.
Could someone test this with an old autoconf and see if it breaks? More
On Mon 17 Mar 2003, BAM wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:56:23 +0100, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > My primary focus has been on making things work (for me) on RH-8.0
> > > with a Gnome desktop. I have tried not to break
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:56:23 +0100, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > My primary focus has been on making things work (for me) on RH-8.0
> > with a Gnome desktop. I have tried not to break backward compatibility
> > (although it p
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:56:23 +0100, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> My primary focus has been on making things work (for me) on RH-8.0
> with a Gnome desktop. I have tried not to break backward compatibility
> (although it probably would be cleaner an more efficient just to take
> out th
On Monday, 17 March 2003, at 10:53:29 (+1100),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> oh nice. i'm sure people will appreciate this. this may actually be
> 4enough reason for a "point release" ie 0.16.6. does anyone
> agree. personally i dont run any of the gnome & kde stuff - so can
> people try the patch and
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:56:23 +0100 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi there,
>
> I like Enlightenment (E16). I also like having a dock with tasklist and
> pager. Therefore I didn't upgrade my Gnome(/KDE) stuff to the newer
> versions that are incompatible with Enlightenment, until las
48 matches
Mail list logo
