Didier Casse wrote:
It's the first time that I get these errors:
*** The enlightenment-config script installed by enlightenment could
not be foun
d
All other stuff have compiled except for engage. Let me get this
straight, does that mean that E 0.16.999 should be installed first?
Apologies this sh
On Tuesday, 01 March 2005, at 15:56:33 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> no one said it was a magical cure. it was a fixup of doing hack of
> _preX after the version to turn it into a raw numeric.
Okay, then explain to me why you added the .001 to 18 packages in CVS
when ONLY THREE of them had _
On Tuesday, 01 March 2005, at 00:43:28 (-0500),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this little rant is unrelated to the actual bug mentioned ... the
> fact that there's ugly 'test: integer expression expected' doesnt
> affect the missing e17 config script (the real cause of build
> failure)
I wasn't referri
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:39:18 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 01 March 2005, at 15:56:33 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > no one said it was a magical cure. it was a fixup of doing hack of
> > _preX after the version to turn it into a raw
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:44:42 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 01 March 2005, at 00:43:28 (-0500),
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > this little rant is unrelated to the actual bug mentioned ... the
> > fact that there's ugly 'test: integer expression
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:35:52 +0100 Bernhard Nemec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> This one has been bugging me for quite some time now. For non-1:1 output
> ratios, text lines were clipped on the right depending on the inset of
> the first character...
> Please apply!
>
> Th
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:06:09 + Shish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > What do you mean by incompatible with other apps?
> >
> > Can you not launch gnome/kde applications from enlightenment? Can you
> > not run EFL apps when running gnome or KDE?
>
> The issue isn't the
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:05:42 +0100 Richard Torkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 11:50 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Friday, 25 February 2005, at 17:42:51 (+0100),
> > Richard Torkar wrote:
> >
> > > Do you have a link to that conversation?
>
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:14:07 -0800 Jonathan Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I cleaned up some weird variable declarations in e_main.c
> (e17/apps/e/src/bin/e_main.c).
i definitely appreciate you looking through the code - thanks but whats is
weird about the variable declar
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:54:55 +0100 Cristalle Azundris Sabon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Is this something that will be accepted by the developers?
> >
> > No. As I just said yesterday, we've been down this road before, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
