Re: [E-devel] E SVN: tasn trunk/devs/tasn

Well, my picture doesn't show on the developers page, I guess it's not automatic and I have to update that manually, will do. :| I wish I could have said teh same, but you are hiding under your ninja mask, I can't really see you. :) -- Tom. On 26/10/11 01:57, ChunEon Park wrote: > > glad to se

[E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

Hey Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, hence pthread.h. _GNU_SOURCE is not defined. Suppose now that a user of Eina does this: #include #include The user will not have the possibility to features available with _GNU_SOURCE (like CPU_SET for example. I ha

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, > hence pthread.h. _GNU_SOURCE is not defined. > > Suppose now that a user of Eina does this: > > #include > #include > > The user will not have the possibility to

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, >> hence pthread.h. _GNU_SOURCE is not defined. >> >> Suppose now that a user of Eina does this: >> >> #include >>

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, >> hence pthread.h. _GNU_SOURCE is not defined. >> >> Suppose now that a user of Eina does this: >> >> #include >>

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, >>> hence pthread.h. _GNU_SOURCE is not defined. >>> >>> Suppose no

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, >>> hence pthread.h. _GNU_SOURCE is not defined. >>> >>> Suppose no

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, hence pthread.

[E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

I'm calling ecore_main_loop_iterate() inside an elementary signal callback. Is that safe? What's happening is that the signal that is calling ecore_main_loop_iterate() is getting triggered twice, even though it was only sent once. I tried moving the ecore_main_loop_iterate() call to another sign

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:46:44 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > I'm calling ecore_main_loop_iterate() inside an elementary signal > callback. Is that safe? > > What's happening is that the signal that is calling > ecore_main_loop_iterate() is getting triggered twice, even though it > was only sent onc

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:52:06 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:46:44 +1000 > David Seikel wrote: > > > I'm calling ecore_main_loop_iterate() inside an elementary signal > > callback. Is that safe? > > > > What's happening is that the signal that is calling > > ecore_main

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:58:09 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:52:06 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz > wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:46:44 +1000 > > David Seikel wrote: > > > > > I'm calling ecore_main_loop_iterate() inside an elementary signal > > > callback. Is that safe? >

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:01:19 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:58:09 +1000 > David Seikel wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:52:06 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:46:44 +1000 > > > David Seikel wrote: > > > > > > > I'm calling ecore

Re: [E-devel] Shot Module Photo Upload Busted

Jeff, At home, screenshot module doesn't do any network connection, so I originally expected a module bug. Could you check that e does connect() and if it does send me the strace -s 1024 trace ? Bertrand On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:23:47 -0500, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > Any suggestions for those of us

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > Eina includes eina_

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: Eina includes eina_inline_lock_posix.h on something else than Windows, hence pthread.

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

2011/10/26 David Seikel : > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:01:19 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz > wrote: > >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:58:09 +1000 >> David Seikel wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:52:06 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:46:44 +1000 >> > > David Seikel wr

Re: [E-devel] problem with Eina and pthread.h (to fix before 1.1 release)

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > Eina includes eina_inline_

[E-devel] Adding array of simple types to an eet.

I'm having an odd problem when trying to add an array of simple types in an eet file. The attached file is the simple cut down version. The real code is more complex, and needs the fuller versions of these structures to be the way they are. I have a macro that is patterned after the other eet ma

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:55:09 -0200 Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > 2011/10/26 David Seikel : > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:01:19 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:58:09 +1000 > >> David Seikel wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:52:06 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz >

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

2011/10/26 David Seikel : > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:55:09 -0200 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > wrote: > >> 2011/10/26 David Seikel : >> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:01:19 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:58:09 +1000 >> >> David Seikel wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, 26 Oct

Re: [E-devel] Adding array of simple types to an eet.

Hey, On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:56 PM, David Seikel wrote: > I'm having an odd problem when trying to add an array of simple types > in an eet file.  The attached file is the simple cut down version.  The > real code is more complex, and needs the fuller versions of these > structures to be the wa

Re: [E-devel] Adding array of simple types to an eet.

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:33:14 +0200 Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hey, > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:56 PM, David Seikel > wrote: > > I'm having an odd problem when trying to add an array of simple > > types in an eet file.  The attached file is the simple cut down > > version.  The real code is more com

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:30:26 -0200 Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > 2011/10/26 David Seikel : > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:55:09 -0200 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > > wrote: > > > >> 2011/10/26 David Seikel : > >> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:01:19 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Wed,

Re: [E-devel] Commit access request for evas & ecore

Hi Jiyoun, I am all for this ! You recent patch are almost going directly in svn, so I think your already earned svn access. Have fun joining this community, On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Jiyoun Park wrote: > Hello. > > I'm Jiyoun Park. > > I also send this mail to ask commit access > for s

[E-devel] Systray and Below Everything

So I know the systray is the red-headed step child of Enlightenment modules, but I have found an issue where if it is placed in a shelf that is set to "below everything" it does not allow anything in it to be selected/clicked on. In case anyone cares ;) -- ~Jeff Hoogland

Re: [E-devel] Commit access request for evas & ecore

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hi Jiyoun, > > I am all for this ! You recent patch are almost going directly in svn, > so I think your already earned svn access. > Agreed I've added your files to /devs, so you will be able to commit to svn soon. Welcome aboard! > Have fu

Re: [E-devel] Commit access request for evas & ecore

On 10/26/11 16:18, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hi Jiyoun, > > I am all for this ! You recent patch are almost going directly in svn, > so I think your already earned svn access. > > Have fun joining this community, > +1 I second ! dh > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Jiyoun Park wrote: >> Hello. >>

Re: [E-devel] Systray and Below Everything

On 10/26/11 16:18, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > So I know the systray is the red-headed step child of Enlightenment modules, > but I have found an issue where if it is placed in a shelf that is set to > "below everything" it does not allow anything in it to be selected/clicked > on. > > In case anyone ca

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/packaging/gentoo/net-libs/webkit-efl

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:07:43 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > new ewk ebuild > > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2011-10-26 18:07:43 -0700 (Wed, 26 Oct 2011) > New Revision: 64419 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/64419 > > Added: > trunk/packag

Re: [E-devel] Commit access request for evas & ecore

+1. You sent really good features and many people liked it. Anyhow CONGRATULATIONS Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Christopher Michael wrote: > On 10/26/11 16:18, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> Hi Jiyoun, >> >> I am all for this ! You recent patch are almost going directly i

Re: [E-devel] FOSDEM 2012

On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:25:47 +0200 Philippe Caseiro said: >how many people would be willing to some to en e/efl specific "econf" - maybe if we schedule it for 2 days following fosdem for example? if we get some conference facilities etc. what i'd like to see here: 1. open invite to anyone who

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: bdilly IN trunk/devs: . jypark

yay! congratulations. Please keep in mind that "with great power comes great responsibility". I anticipate your successive good patches. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > Add jypark to devs > >  Welcome, Jiyoun Park! > > > Author:       b

Re: [E-devel] FOSDEM 2012

On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:13:04 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:25:47 +0200 Philippe Caseiro > said: > > > >how many people would be willing to some to en e/efl specific "econf" - maybe > if we schedule it for 2 days following fosdem for example? if we get s

[E-devel] [patch] elm_genlist - add elm_genlist_item_fields_update function

Dear developers I made a patch to add elm_genlist_item_fields_update function. It can be used to updating genlist's item part without realize/unrealize itself. Prototype is elm_genlist_item_fields_update (Elm_Genlist_Item *it, const char *part, Elm_Genlist_Item_Field_Flags itf) Part supports gl

Re: [E-devel] ecore_main_loop_iterate() safety?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:46:44 +1000 David Seikel said: > I'm calling ecore_main_loop_iterate() inside an elementary signal > callback. Is that safe? > > What's happening is that the signal that is calling > ecore_main_loop_iterate() is getting triggered twice, even though it > was only sent once

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] add elm_entry_autocapital_type_{set/get} and elm_entry_input_panel_enabled_{set/get} API

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:53:18 +0900 Jihoon Kim said: reviewed - looks ok to me. in svn it is! thanks! :) > I missed to attach the patch file, so I send again. > Thanks. > > -Original Message- > From: Jihoon Kim [mailto:jihoon48@samsung.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:51 P

Re: [E-devel] [patch] elm_genlist - add elm_genlist_item_fields_update function

Hello I revised some naming conventions by seoz's comment. And also attaching new test case for elm_genlist_item_fields_update. Thank you -Original Message- From: Hyoyoung Chang [mailto:hyoyoung.ch...@samsung.com] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:06 PM To: 'Enlightenment developer lis

Re: [E-devel] [Patch] edje transition from current position

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:49:41 + (GMT) Jaehwan Kim said: idea -> good. but why double the # of tween modes? why not use a bitmask like typedef enum _Edje_Tween_Mode { EDJE_TWEEN_MODE_NONE = 0, EDJE_TWEEN_MODE_LINEAR= 1, EDJE_TWEEN_MODE_SINUSOIDAL= 2,

Re: [E-devel] Commit access request for edje and elementry

+1 here. You sent very good patches so far. Thanks! Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Jaehwan Kim wrote: > Dear all, > > Hello. This is Jaehwan Kim. > > I write this mail to get the commit access. > I work for Samsung, S/W Platform, UI team. > I have worked this company f

Re: [E-devel] Commit access request for edje and elementry

On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:33:28 +0900 Jaehwan Kim wrote: > Dear all, > > Hello. This is Jaehwan Kim. > > I write this mail to get the commit access. > I work for Samsung, S/W Platform, UI team. > I have worked this company for 3 years. I used the EFL for that time. > > For current 1 year, I was i