On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> edje: use eo more.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2012-12-08 01:21:10 -0800 (Sat, 08 Dec 2012)
> New Revision: 80519
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/80519
>
> Modified:
> trunk/edje/src/lib/ed
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Vincent Torri
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Vincent Torri
wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:43:36 +0200 Vincent Torri
>>> said:
>>>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Lucas De Ma
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:43:36 +0200 Vincent Torri
>> said:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Vincent T
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:43:36 +0200 Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Vincent Torri
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lucas De Ma
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:40:12 -0300 "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)"
> said:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, L
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
>> wrote:
> that's what the commit message is for. When it does all automatically,
> then it's an option.
>>>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:28 AM, David Seikel wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:19:51 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumen
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:43:36 +0200 Vincent Torri said:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Vincent Torri
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torr
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:40:12 -0300 "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)"
said:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Bl
>> And Vincent, please stop taking it personal and insulting the others.
>> Use "stupid" for ideas. Not people.
>
> the conversation is heated, that's all. I'm from south of France and
> we are not calm people, there. His answer upset me because what he
> said was almost an insult to what I did in
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etr
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
>>> wrote:
>> that's what the commit message is for. Whe
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira
>>> wrote:
On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wro
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other
2012/9/20 Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) :
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
>> wrote:
> that's what the commit message is for. When it does all automatically,
> then it's an option.
did you look at the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
>>> wrote:
>> that's what the commit message is for. Whe
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
> wrote:
that's what the commit message is for. When it does all automatically,
then it's an option.
>>>
>>> did you look at the Evil's changeLog ? You'll see why the commit
>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
>> wrote:
> that's what the commit message is for. When it does all automatically,
> then it's an option.
>>>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira
> wrote:
>> On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
>>> entire universe...
>>
>> I honestly thoug
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
> wrote:
that's what the commit message is for. When it does all automatically,
then it's an option.
>>>
>>> did you look at the Evil's changeLog ? You'll see why the commit
>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
wrote:
>>> that's what the commit message is for. When it does all automatically,
>>> then it's an option.
>>
>> did you look at the Evil's changeLog ? You'll see why the commit
>> message is not sufficient
>>
>
> If you are talking about the
>> that's what the commit message is for. When it does all automatically,
>> then it's an option.
>
> did you look at the Evil's changeLog ? You'll see why the commit
> message is not sufficient
>
If you are talking about the list of files changed, it is just plain
useless. There is a --verbose op
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
>> entire universe...
>
> I honestly thought Edje was stable enough that it didn't have recent
> changes -- a
On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
> entire universe...
I honestly thought Edje was stable enough that it didn't have recent
changes -- and since ChangeLogs are traditionally written with newer
entries
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Lucas De Marchi
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkr
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:28 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:19:51 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>> > wrote:
>> >> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanel
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>>> wrote:
ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely lik
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:19:51 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> > wrote:
> >> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other
> >> changelog in the entire universe...
> >
>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
>>> entire universe...
>>
>> i men
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
>> entire universe...
>
> i mentioned that several times: the moap tool
>
> 1) moap cl prep
> 2) yo
yep, but HE WHO SHALL REMAIN NAMELESS said that "logs are created with the
most recent item at the bottom. changelogs are logs. thus changelogs must
have the most recent item at the bottom."
direct quote.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Ce
2012/9/20 Vincent Torri :
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>> doesn't work with git, and I was talking about the stupid reverse ordering
>>> of changelogs that we have
>>
>> I know you love top posting !
>
>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> doesn't work with git, and I was talking about the stupid reverse ordering
>> of changelogs that we have
>
> I know you love top posting !
that's also more logical to put the r
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> doesn't work with git, and I was talking about the stupid reverse ordering
>> of changelogs that we have
http://thomas.apestaart.org/moap/trac/
"Supported version control syst
I'm all about the top post
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > doesn't work with git, and I was talking about the stupid reverse
> ordering
> > of changelogs that we have
>
> I know you love top posting !
> --
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> doesn't work with git, and I was talking about the stupid reverse ordering
> of changelogs that we have
I know you love top posting !
--
Cedric BAIL
--
Ever
doesn't work with git, and I was talking about the stupid reverse ordering
of changelogs that we have
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
> entire universe...
i mentioned that several times: the moap tool
1) moap cl prep
2) you edit ChangeLog
3) moap cl ci
that's all
Vincent
ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
entire universe...
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Enlightenment SVN <
no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> edje: damn top poster !
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2012-09-19 23:27:34 -0700 (Wed, 19 Sep
daniel++
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from the looks of this patch you can probably save yourself some time
> and compares by checking for pl->u.ep->name at the beginning of this
> hunk and skipping it entirely if it's NULL.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel Willmann
>
>
Hi,
from the looks of this patch you can probably save yourself some time
and compares by checking for pl->u.ep->name at the beginning of this
hunk and skipping it entirely if it's NULL.
Regards,
Daniel Willmann
On 09/11/2012 09:15 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> edje: don't strcmp ith NUL
gards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Daniel Juyung Seo"
To: "Enlightenment developer list";
Cc: ;
Sent: 2012-09-06 (목) 19:25:16
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/edje/src/lib
Yes in dev mode, we can fix it early by crashing it.
But I don't want to all
niel Juyung Seo"
>> To: "Enlightenment developer
>> list";
>> Cc: ;
>> Sent: 2012-09-06 (목) 19:15:48
>> Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/edje/src/lib
>>
>> the problem is that. it was not a small application crash.
>> my e17 i
d out early.
>
>
>
> -Regards, Hermet-
> -Original Message-
> From: "Daniel Juyung Seo"
> To: "Enlightenment developer list";
> Cc: ;
> Sent: 2012-09-06 (목) 19:15:48
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/edje/src/lib
>
> the
Thanks to u,
The problem was found out early.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Daniel Juyung Seo"
To: "Enlightenment developer list";
Cc: ;
Sent: 2012-09-06 (목) 19:15:48
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric tru
ards, Hermet-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Daniel Juyung Seo"<seojuyu...@gmail.com>
> To: <enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>;
> Cc: <enlightenment-...@lists.sourceforge.net>;
> Sent: 2012-09-06 (목) 19:08:39
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN:
t;;
Sent: 2012-09-06 (목) 19:08:39
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/edje/src/lib
Thanks. Great!
Now E17 works. Arggg NULL check!!!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Enlightenment SVN
<no-reply>@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> edje: corr
Thanks. Great!
Now E17 works. Arggg NULL check!!!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> edje: correct NULL check. Happy SeoZ :-)
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2012-09-06 03:05:34 -0700 (Thu, 06 Sep 2012)
> New Revision: 76235
> Tr
oops, sorry :)
2012/6/24 Enlightenment SVN
> Log:
> edje: Resistance is futile. The B0rk.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2012-06-23 23:01:12 -0700 (Sat, 23 Jun 2012)
> New Revision: 72754
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/72754
>
> Modified:
> trunk/edje/src/
2012/1/23 Cedric BAIL :
> Because we are crazy french ! More seriously, by doing this you can
> just #include the original elementary theme and change some part in a
> group without copying code. So a very small and easy to read new theme
> that will be kept in sync with original one. As for my pho
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
wrote:
> 2012/1/23 Enlightenment SVN :
>> Log:
>> edje: detect when we try to inherit from ourself.
>>
>>
>> Author: cedric
>> Date: 2012-01-23 07:45:12 -0800 (Mon, 23 Jan 2012)
>> New Revision: 67472
>> Trac: http://trac
2012/1/23 Enlightenment SVN :
> Log:
> edje: detect when we try to inherit from ourself.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2012-01-23 07:45:12 -0800 (Mon, 23 Jan 2012)
> New Revision: 67472
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/67472
>
> Modified:
> trunk/edje/src/bin/
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:01:02 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:58:11 +0100
> Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:50:13 +0100
> > > Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:58:11 +0100
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:50:13 +0100
> > Cedric BAIL wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:50:13 +0100
> Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -0800
>> > "Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Log:
>> >> edje: major
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:50:13 +0100
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -0800
> > "Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
> >
> >> Log:
> >> edje: major cleanup of map calc in edje, now done inside Edje_Calc_Param.
> >>
> >> N
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -0800
> "Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> edje: major cleanup of map calc in edje, now done inside Edje_Calc_Param.
>>
>> NOTE: This was necessary for solving issue with the new CURRENT feature. I
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -0800
"Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
> Log:
> edje: major cleanup of map calc in edje, now done inside Edje_Calc_Param.
>
> NOTE: This was necessary for solving issue with the new CURRENT feature. I
> don't like this massive change, but there is no way around. This
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
> said:
>
>> Log:
>> edje: major cleanup of map calc in edje, now done inside Edje_Calc_Param.
>>
>> NOTE: This was necessary for solving issue with the new CURRENT feature. I
>>
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
said:
> Log:
> edje: major cleanup of map calc in edje, now done inside Edje_Calc_Param.
>
> NOTE: This was necessary for solving issue with the new CURRENT feature. I
> don't like this massive change, but there is no way around. This
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:55:38 -0800
"Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
> Log:
> edje: major cleanup of map calc in edje, now done inside Edje_Calc_Param.
>
> NOTE: This was necessary for solving issue with the new CURRENT feature. I
> don't like this massive change, but there is no way around. This
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 06:15:37 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
wrote:
> Log:
> edje: remove warning when building without Ecore_IMF.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2011-11-20 06:15:37 -0800 (Sun, 20 Nov 2011)
> New Revision: 65440
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/
backport to 1.0 ?
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> edje: fix cache and proxy.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2011-08-14 14:55:31 -0700 (Sun, 14 Aug 2011)
> New Revision: 62464
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/62464
>
> Modified:
> trunk
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:51:53 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN"
said:
so... what about colorclasses? they probably have the same problems as the last
2 textclass commit fixes. :)
> Log:
> edje: fix huge memory leak.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2011-06-22 07:51:53 -0700 (Wed, 22 Jun 201
This patch broke everything.
If the signal is o*bj[id]:signal*.
Elementary is waiting *[id]:signal* and this patch provides *signal *which
is not enough. Elm need the* id.*
I do not know what cedric was trying to do and he is at holidays for 2
weeks.
I think we should revert it.
2010/11/30 Enli
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:47:38 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> said:
>> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>> >>> Log:
>> >>>
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:39:42 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
> > actually... this brings up a bit of an issue. using cpp/cc/gcc to handle
> > #includes and macros and #ifdefs and so on was a handy idea... but it
> > #creates a
> > LOT of problems in the maintainability and portability of edje_cc d
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:47:38 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
* edje: improve
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:47:38 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >>> Log:
> >>> * edje: improve portability and simplify code.
> >>>
> >
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> * edje: SPANK ! SPANK ! SPANK !
>
> fprintf should always specify a format.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2010-12-03 10:21:56 -0800 (Fri, 03 Dec 2010)
> New Revision: 55213
> Trac: http://trac.enli
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
* edje: improve portability and simplify code.
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s -I%s %s -E -o %s - < %s",
+ gete
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>> Log:
>> * edje: improve portability and simplify code.
>>
>> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s -I%s %s -E -o %s - < %s",
>> + getenv("CC") ? getenv("CC") : "cc"
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> * edje: improve portability and simplify code.
>
> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s -I%s %s -E -o %s - < %s",
> + getenv("CC") ? getenv("CC") : "cc",
> inc, def, tmpn, file_in);
>
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hello, this is Daniel Juyung Seo.
>
> I have a question about below commit.
>
> It looks like the statement is trying to avoid argc == 2.
> Why 'argc > 2 || argc < 2' was used instead of 'argc != 2' ?
> Any reasons?
Maybe it was too early
Hello, this is Daniel Juyung Seo.
I have a question about below commit.
It looks like the statement is trying to avoid argc == 2.
Why 'argc > 2 || argc < 2' was used instead of 'argc != 2' ?
Any reasons?
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Daniel Juyung Seo.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Enlightenment
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 07:26:43 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:24:28 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> > all other callback adds use const void *data - and that's correct
> > as it means the
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:24:28 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
> all other callback adds use const void *data - and that's correct as it means
> the add doesnt do anything to what data points to (doesn't modify) but the
> callback
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:24:28 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
all other callback adds use const void *data - and that's correct as it means
the add doesnt do anything to what data points to (doesn't modify) but the
callback itself that is passed this pointer gets void * as the callback can
modiy w
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> * edje: fix constness warning.
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2010-06-01 07:35:19 -0700 (Tue, 01 Jun 2010)
> New Revision: 49372
>
> Modified:
> trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_util.c
>
> Modified: trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_util.c
> ==
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>> Log:
>> * edje: Another round of llvm warning removal.
>>
>> Author: cedric
>> Date: 2009-10-07 04:36:23 -0700 (Wed, 07 Oct 2009)
>> New Revision: 42932
>>
>> Modified:
>> tr
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> * edje: Another round of llvm warning removal.
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2009-10-07 04:36:23 -0700 (Wed, 07 Oct 2009)
> New Revision: 42932
>
> Modified:
> trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_edit.c trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_util.c
>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:21:11 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Enlightenment
>> SVN wrote:
>> > Log:
>> > * edje: Reduce sizeof (Edje_Calc_Params).
>> >
>> > Note: It doesn't really
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:21:11 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Enlightenment
> SVN wrote:
> > Log:
> > * edje: Reduce sizeof (Edje_Calc_Params).
> >
> > Note: It doesn't really impact edje memory foot print yet. But in
> > the plan to do
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:39:23 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Gustavo Sverzut
> Barbieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Enlightenment
> > SVN wrote:
> >> Log:
> >> * edje: Reduce sizeof (Edje_Calc_Params).
> >>
> >> Note: It doesn't really impa
Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> * edje_calc: Major cleanup.
> - Edje_Real_Part use less memory.
> - Edje_Real_Part and Edje_Real_Part_State now use a mempool.
> - When both param1 and param2 are the same, only recalc param1.
> - Don't
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, t...@hiddenrock.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Modified: trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h
>>> ===
>>> --- trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h 2009-08-1
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> > Modified: trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h
> > ===
> > --- trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h 2009-08-13 15:42:30 UTC (rev
> > 41743)
> > +++ trunk/edje/sr
> Modified: trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h
> ===
> --- trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h 2009-08-13 15:42:30 UTC (rev 41743)
> +++ trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_private.h 2009-08-13 16:13:49 UTC (rev 41744)
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@
>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Gustavo Sverzut
> Barbieri wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Enlightenment
>> SVN wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> * edje: Reduce sizeof (Edje_Calc_Params).
>>>
>>> Note: It doesn't really impact edje m
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Gustavo Sverzut
Barbieri wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Enlightenment
> SVN wrote:
>> Log:
>> * edje: Reduce sizeof (Edje_Calc_Params).
>>
>> Note: It doesn't really impact edje memory foot print yet. But in
>> the plan to do a comput
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Enlightenment
SVN wrote:
> Log:
> * edje: Reduce sizeof (Edje_Calc_Params).
>
> Note: It doesn't really impact edje memory foot print yet. But in
> the plan to do a computation cache inside edje, this structure
> will be used a lot (I am
93 matches
Mail list logo
