this code still has lots of (bad) compile warnings. I'm not your dad, fix them
before you commit in the future
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:28:55 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
come on guys, run 'make' or (if you get paid to develop, you may consider)
distcheck
On Friday, November 30, 2012, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
come on guys, run 'make' or (if you get paid to develop, you may consider)
distcheck before committing
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2012-11-30 10:28:55 -0800 (Fri, 30 Nov 2012)
New Revision: 79937
Trac:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:46:14 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Friday, November 30, 2012, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
come on guys, run 'make' or (if you get paid to develop, you may consider)
distcheck before committing
Author: discomfitor
* Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi [2012-11-30 17:46:14
-0200]:
On Friday, November 30, 2012, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
come on guys, run 'make' or (if you get paid to develop, you may consider)
distcheck before committing
Author: discomfitor
Date:
On Friday, November 30, 2012, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:46:14 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi javascript:; wrote:
On Friday, November 30, 2012, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
come on guys, run 'make' or (if you get paid to develop, you
* Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com [2012-05-30 13:46:39 +0900]:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
fix case where user can specify item
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
fix case where user can specify item block size 1; this also reveals an api
error since the param here should obviously be a uint.
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2012-05-29 02:04:42 -0700
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
fix case where user can specify item block size 1; this also reveals an
api error since the param here should
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:14:46 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
revert 68495 and all subsequent toolbar refactoring (rewriting) commits
because they broke toolbar use for everyone. in the future, rewrites like
this MUST be submitted as PATCHES, not direct commits.
Hi
Sorry about the toolbar broken.
I should have tested and reviewed it enough.
I reverted the elm_button.c and button.edc. It related to 68495.
It's not necessary whitout the revision.
I'll try to change the code for focusing later. And I'll send the patch.
Thanks
--
Jaehwan Kim.
2012년 3월 2일
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:26:07 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:14:46 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
revert 68495 and all subsequent toolbar refactoring (rewriting)
commits because they broke toolbar use
2011/12/5 Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org:
Log:
fix super annoying elm_win bug that went something like this:
win_resize_object_add(win, subobj);
object_content_set(otherobj, subobj);
object_del(win);
ERR21326:elm-externals elm_widget.c:978 elm_widget_sub_object_del()
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 23:35:34 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
front...front...front...BACK! BACK! NO WAIT FRONT! NO, BACK!
ARRG
finding this commit wasted an hour of my life.
Author: discomfitor
Date:
In this regard, no they should no longer have issues w/ some text
rendering...Good Catch !! ;) Sometimes, you don't necessarily want to
get rid of the back buffer context. Use it to swap. In a flip context,
this is correct i believe
(normally i do not top post)
dh
On 12/04/11 04:09,
On 12/04/11 00:02, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
header and docs for elm_win_center got lost in an earlier merge I guess
Fix the algorithm yet ? I've seen a place where you still can fall
throughtisk, tick
dh
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2011-12-03 21:02:02 -0800 (Sat, 03
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:46:34 -0500
Christopher Michael cpmicha...@comcast.net wrote:
On 12/04/11 00:02, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
header and docs for elm_win_center got lost in an earlier merge I guess
Fix the algorithm yet ? I've seen a place where you still can fall
On 12/04/11 14:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:46:34 -0500
Christopher Michaelcpmicha...@comcast.net wrote:
On 12/04/11 00:02, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
header and docs for elm_win_center got lost in an earlier merge I guess
Fix the algorithm yet ? I've seen a
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 15:09:21 -0500
Christopher Michael cpmicha...@comcast.net wrote:
On 12/04/11 14:06, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:46:34 -0500
Christopher Michaelcpmicha...@comcast.net wrote:
On 12/04/11 00:02, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
header and docs
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:34:55 +0900
ChunEon Parkher...@naver.com wrote:
Skimming over, it looks same with elm_toolbar_item_icon_set().
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Enlightenment SVNlt;no-re...@enlightenment.orggt;
To:
Skimmed over, it looked similar with
elm_toolbar_item_icon_set( ITEM, FILEPATH ).
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Enlightenment
SVNlt;no-re...@enlightenment.orggt;
To: enlightenment-...@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Sent: 11-12-02(금) 04:14:49
hmm.. does elm_icon_object_get API good to go?
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Enlightenment SVNlt;no-re...@enlightenment.orggt;
To: enlightenment-...@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Sent: 11-11-07(월) 00:56:31
Subject: E SVN: discomfitor
Actually, we never do that! We never expose internal objects for outside
manipulation, even if it's just for querying purposes. I don't know if
that decision is good or not, but it's a fact.
If this rule is broken, it should be discussed as I'd like to do the
same in elm_entry.
--
Tom.
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:35:47 +0200
Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
Actually, we never do that! We never expose internal objects for outside
manipulation, even if it's just for querying purposes. I don't know if
that decision is good or not, but it's a fact.
If this rule
Shouldnt be needed or done. Geometry is not a good reason.
On Monday, November 7, 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:35:47 +0200
Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
Actually, we never do that! We never expose internal objects for outside
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:36:50 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Shouldnt be needed or done. Geometry is not a good reason.
Sure, but it was the first example that came to mind. A better one would be
creating a dbus notification event from an image. You need the row
On 07/11/11 18:41, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:36:50 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Shouldnt be needed or done. Geometry is not a good reason.
Sure, but it was the first example that came to mind. A better one would be
creating a dbus
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:23:53 +0200
Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
On 07/11/11 18:41, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:36:50 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Shouldnt be needed or done. Geometry is not a good reason.
Sure, but it was the
On 07/11/11 22:33, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
So you're saying now that I should add specific elm functions to wrap other
libraries just to avoid exposing stuff? I knew the elm api was shitty, but I
didn't expect that it would go that far...
Don't shoot the messenger, but yes, that's what's
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:44:37 +0200 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com said:
On 07/11/11 22:33, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
So you're saying now that I should add specific elm functions to wrap other
libraries just to avoid exposing stuff? I knew the elm api was shitty, but I
didn't expect that it
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:48:10 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:44:37 +0200 Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com said:
On 07/11/11 22:33, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
So you're saying now that I should add specific elm functions to wrap
other
On 28/10/11 13:25, WooHyun Jung wrote:
+1 ~
(wanna hear Tom's opinion. Is there any reason that this API is not
deprecated yet?)
Because entry is a special case. Entry is all about manipulating text,
so you'll end up keeping entry_entry_append and more will probably be
added in the future.
+1 ~
(wanna hear Tom's opinion. Is there any reason that this API is not
deprecated yet?)
2011/10/28, Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:12:54 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add long forgotten note for entry filters
Author:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:12:54 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add long forgotten note for entry filters
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2011-10-27 12:12:53 -0700 (Thu, 27 Oct 2011)
New Revision: 64446
Trac:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:50:44 +0900
ChunEon Parkher...@naver.com wrote:
they can call evas_object_del and content_pop for subobj.
Let's run together for the best moment!
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Enlightenment
) 14:59:03
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:50:44 +0900
ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt; wrote:
they can call evas_object_del and content_pop for subobj.
Let's run together for the best moment
;enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netgt; Cc: her...@naver.com
Sent: 11-10-12(수) 14:59:03
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:50:44 +0900
ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt; wrote:
they can call evas_object_del and content_pop for subobj
-
From: Mike Blumenkrantzlt;m...@zentific.comgt;
To: ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt;
Cc: Enlightenment develolt;enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netgt;
Sent: 11-10-12(수) 16:18:22
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:06:19 +0900
ChunEon
...@zentific.comgt;
To: Enlightenment developer
listlt;enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netgt; Cc: her...@naver.com
Sent: 11-10-12(수) 14:59:03
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:50:44 +0900
ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt; wrote
...@zentific.comgt;
To: ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt;
Cc: Enlightenment develolt;enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netgt;
Sent: 11-10-12(수) 17:15:10
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:02:33 +0900
ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt; wrote:
Yes
, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Mike Blumenkrantzlt;m...@zentific.comgt;
To: ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt;
Cc: Enlightenment develolt;enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netgt;
Sent: 11-10-12(수) 17:15:10
Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib
they can call evas_object_del and content_pop for subobj.
Let's run together for the best moment!
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Enlightenment SVNlt;no-re...@enlightenment.orggt;
To: enlightenment-...@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Sent:
i noticed it but forgot to tell you. i was on the bus at that time.
so not nobody :p
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Sep 30, 2011 5:28 AM, Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org
wrote:
Log:
apparently I forgot to add this in my earlier toolbar commit and nobody
noticed
Author: discomfitor
I love this commit!
This will be so helpful to application programmers.
Thanks stu!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
make ELM_CHECK_WIDTYPE co macros useful. would you believe this macro came
from my first
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:43:48 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
also fix text_converter I guess
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2011-08-25 19:43:48 -0700 (Thu, 25 Aug 2011)
New Revision: 62849
Trac:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:08:56 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
unbreak elm_menu_item api
the following functions are now DEPRECATED and will be removed on 5 AUG
2011: elm_menu_item_object_icon_get - elm_menu_item_object_content_get
elm_menu_item_icon_get
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:12:29 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
significantly improve tooltip orientation calculations
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2011-07-27 00:12:28 -0700 (Wed, 27 Jul 2011)
New Revision: 61795
Trac:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:03:46 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
+elm_icon_memfile_set
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2011-07-22 16:03:46 -0700 (Fri, 22 Jul 2011)
New Revision: 61603
Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/61603
47 matches
Mail list logo
