[e-users] Evidence emerge failed

2006-12-27 Thread Marc Guyard
Hi, I've a error on my evidence emerge. usr/lib/libXdmcp.so -ldl -lm gui/.libs/libevidence_gui.a(libevidence_gui_gtk2_common_la-tooltip.o): In functi on `tooltip_cancel': tooltip.c:(.text+0xf81): undefined reference to `evas_object_gradient_colors_cle ar' tooltip.c:(.text+0xfb1): undefined

Re: [e-users] evidence

2006-10-16 Thread Massimo Maiurana
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 16/10/2006 01:14, scrisse: PS: Is there an italian e17 list? don't know - but we do have other italians on this list :) ...though they (we) could not be able to give you an answer to every question ;) -- Massimo Maiurana

[e-users] evidence

2006-10-15 Thread Michele Caini
Hi, I'm a new italian gentoo-user and my english is... Orrible!! Otherwise, I'll try to explain my problem. I'd like to compile evidence, but it's impossible!! There is a problem in tooltip.c (undefined reference to... etc. etc.) and... Error: app-misc/evidence- failed. emake failed!! Someone

Re: [e-users] evidence

2006-10-15 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:05:43 +0200 Michele Caini [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Hi, I'm a new italian gentoo-user and my english is... Orrible!! Otherwise, I'll try to explain my problem. I'd like to compile evidence, but it's impossible!! There is a problem in tooltip.c (undefined reference

Re: [e-users] Evidence doesn't compile recently

2006-10-14 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
Evidence needs to be updated to API changes in Evas. On 10/13/06, Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The other day i was rebuilding my e-setup, as i hear its good to do that now and then, on my desktop and noticed evidence didn't look right. So i attempted to recompile it and got a

[e-users] Evidence doesn't compile recently

2006-10-13 Thread Zachary Goldberg
The other day i was rebuilding my e-setup, as i hear its good to do that now and then, on my desktop and noticed evidence didn't look right. So i attempted to recompile it and got a build error. Tried it again today, (3 days later) same error. Running gentoo, gentoo-kernel 2.6.17-r8, e17

[e-users] Evidence make fails

2006-10-01 Thread Luca
Hi! I'm trying to compile evidence but it ends up with errors. Attached is the configigure and make log. Bye, Luca checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible

Re: [e-users] Evidence make fails

2006-10-01 Thread Luca
Justin wrote: Luca wrote: Hi! I'm trying to compile evidence but it ends up with errors. Attached is the configigure and make log. Is Evidence even in active development still? I don't know but the last package I saw was of 2005, however it looked nice so I tried to install it. Luca

Re: [e-users] Evidence make fails

2006-10-01 Thread Justin
Luca wrote: Justin wrote: Luca wrote: Hi! I'm trying to compile evidence but it ends up with errors. Attached is the configigure and make log. Is Evidence even in active development still? I don't know but the last package I saw was of 2005, however it looked

Re: [e-users] Evidence make fails

2006-10-01 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 01 October 2006, at 11:11:59 (-0700), Justin wrote: Evidence isn't being developed anymore. The replacement is called Entropy. There is no truth to this statement whatsoever. Evidence development has not stopped, and Entropy is not a replacement for anything. Michael -- Michael

Re: [e-users] Evidence make fails

2006-10-01 Thread Anders Troback
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:21:12 -0400 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 01 October 2006, at 11:11:59 (-0700), Justin wrote: Evidence isn't being developed anymore. The replacement is called Entropy. There is no truth to this statement whatsoever. Evidence development

Re: [e-users] Evidence make fails

2006-10-01 Thread Justin
Anders Troback wrote: On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:21:12 -0400 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday, 01 October 2006, at 11:11:59 (-0700), Justin wrote: Evidence isn't being developed anymore. The replacement is called Entropy. There is no truth to this statement

[e-users] evidence debian package

2006-01-25 Thread Holger Dell
hi, the evidence debian package (unstable/evidence_0.9.8-0cvs20060102_i386.deb) seems to have missing a dependency to the package 'libdoodle1'. installing this package manually, evidence works fine. best regards, holger dell. On 1/20/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[e-users] evidence

2005-12-07 Thread Foxy
I wonder if evidence is still being developed? As I see the last CVS commit was in July. The problem is that I cannot compile it against the latest cvs build of e17, got the error about evas. Could it be that the current evidence is not compatible with the latest evas? The error ttf.c:166:

Re: [e-users] evidence

2005-12-07 Thread Foxy
Justin wrote: Foxy wrote: I wonder if evidence is still being developed? As I see the last CVS commit was in July. The problem is that I cannot compile it against the latest cvs build of e17, got the error about evas. Could it be that the current evidence is not compatible with the latest

[e-users] Evidence doc?

2005-11-22 Thread Florent Thiery
Hi. I made an iconset today for evidence... So far, no pbs. When i tried to make a custom theme, i customized the metallo theme. I just want to have a normal theme (like the default one) but with transparent background. I managed to do it somehow, thanx to a minor error (doesn't affect

Re: [e-users] evidence updating errors

2005-11-07 Thread Alan Trick
Yeah, I'm getting the same thing: cvs login: authorization failed: server cvs.sourceforge.net rejected access to /cvsroot/evidence for user anonymous it's been like that since yesterday - really anoying Didier Casse wrote: On 11/6/05, eric dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, recently i get

Re: [e-users] evidence updating errors

2005-11-07 Thread Didier Casse
On 11/7/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I'm getting the same thing: cvs login: authorization failed: server cvs.sourceforge.net rejected access to /cvsroot/evidence for user anonymous it's been like that since yesterday - really anoying For me it has been like that for a

Re: [e-users] evidence updating errors

2005-11-07 Thread Florent Thiery
I do confirm this, since two weeks or so Didier Casse a écrit : On 11/7/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I'm getting the same thing: cvs login: authorization failed: server cvs.sourceforge.net rejected access to /cvsroot/evidence for user anonymous it's been like that since

Re: [e-users] evidence updating errors

2005-11-07 Thread Didier Casse
On 11/7/05, Florent Thiery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do confirm this, since two weeks or so Eh oui effectivement! (Yes indeed!) -- With kind regards, Didier. Yum/apt repository for DR17/EFL: http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe Didier F.B Casse PhD candidate, Singapore Synchrotron

Re: [e-users] evidence updating errors

2005-11-07 Thread Dan
eric dan wrote: hi, recently i get error messages saying that i should try a real password when getting evidence from cvs. has anyone else had this problem? thanks I was under the impression that evidence had been dormant for a couple of months anyway. If I'm wrong, then that makes me a

Re: [e-users] evidence updating errors

2005-11-05 Thread Didier Casse
On 11/6/05, eric dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, recently i get error messages saying that i should try a real password when getting evidence from cvs. has anyone else had this problem? thanks Yes evidence cvs has been cranky for a while now. I mentioned it to azundris who never really

[e-users] Evidence - Buffer Overflow

2005-10-28 Thread Jim Summers
Hello List, After a couple of hundred printf statements I am pretty sure I located the statement/function causing my buffer overflow. It is: noir_sess_create(SESSION_CREATE,ns,NULL); at line 1223 in: src/gui/gtk2/gui_gtk2.c I grepped through the evidence tree to see if this was in a

Re: [e-users] Evidence and EFM

2005-10-12 Thread P. G. Richardson
Excellent ... thanks for filling me in. Wasnt so much confused about EFM's status as Evidence's place in the E17 scheme of things as I really like it. Not suggesting anything by this just that it began with E and it came down the pipe with the other E17 rpms. Certainly beats Nautilus in

[e-users] evidence tree browser

2005-09-25 Thread Andreas Volz
Hi, I still use Nautilus instead of evidence, because I don't like the tree browser mode in evidence. Evidence looks really great in file modus, but why is there no mode that has left a tree browser and right a file browser. Like Nautilus, Konqueror, Windows Filemanager, and all these well known

Re: [e-users] evidence tree browser

2005-09-25 Thread dienekes
Andreas Volz wrote: Hi, I still use Nautilus instead of evidence, because I don't like the tree browser mode in evidence. Evidence looks really great in file modus, but why is there no mode that has left a tree browser and right a file browser. Like Nautilus, Konqueror, Windows Filemanager, and

[e-users] evidence

2005-08-21 Thread Fernando Meira
Hi, been trying to theme evidence and something may not be right.. I'm using gant theme and I get this: (...) 0 thumbnail.c::thumbnailer_cxl: sent SIGKILL to thumbnailer task for /home/nando/./.evidence/filemanager_indigo.png... 0 thumbnail.c::thumbnailer_cxl: sent SIGKILL to thumbnailer task for

Re: [e-users] evidence

2005-08-21 Thread Thomas Kuther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:35:38 + Fernando Meira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, been trying to theme evidence and something may not be right.. I'm using gant theme and I get this: (...) 0 thumbnail.c::thumbnailer_cxl: sent SIGKILL to thumbnailer

Re: [e-users] evidence

2005-08-21 Thread Fernando Meira
Hi, yes, it has that structure.. along with other files! Any idea of what it's going on?On 8/21/05, Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:35:38 +Fernando Meira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, been trying to theme evidence and

[e-users] Evidence bug

2005-07-28 Thread Steve Torrefranca
if someone has posted this feature i am sorry. I have been trying evidence with gant theme. well i dont usually delete files from evidence, but tonight i tried deleting all files from a folder with 250 text files. a confirmation to delete pop-up shows. cool. but the buttons, Yes Yes to All

[e-users] Evidence Fonts

2005-06-28 Thread Jason Smith
Hello, I am running e17, I have the cvs version of Evidence. If I run Evidence with a -T gant, it looks great. However if I try Evidence -T gant -P gfilerunner, the fonts on some of the folders are much bigger than they should be. Does anyone have a way to make the font the same for all the

Re: [e-users] evidence again!!

2005-03-08 Thread ktabic
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:05:10 -0600, the sky darkened, lightning flashed and the voice of MillTek spake thus: Hi, I just tried tocompile evidence. I used source that I had from about a week ago and then I downloaded the latest CVS. In both cases the make failed as follows: -- snip error

Re: [e-users] evidence again!!

2005-03-08 Thread Jim Philips
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 05:35 am, ktabic wrote: On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:05:10 -0600, the sky darkened, lightning flashed and the voice of MillTek spake thus: Hi, I just tried tocompile evidence. I used source that I had from about a week ago and then I downloaded the latest CVS. In both

[e-users] evidence

2005-03-04 Thread jim lawrence
hi all, I'm getting some build errors. i have follow destructions made sure i had everything required. This is the output from the make command grep: /usr/lib/libcairo.la: No such file or directory /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libcairo.la: No such file or directory libtool: link:

Re: [e-users] evidence

2005-03-04 Thread Adrien Tougas
It appears that you are missing cairo. http://cairographics.org/introduction ^^ should have all the info you need. On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:57 -0500, jim lawrence wrote: hi all, I'm getting some build errors. i have follow destructions made sure i had everything required. This is the output

[e-users] Evidence Evas

2004-08-07 Thread John Halbert
hi, I'm having trouble with compiling Evidence; I'm using DR16 (0.16.6) and when I'm compile Evidence I'm getting the error: In file included from evidence.c:31: thumbnail.h:4:20: Evas.h: No such file or directory In file included from evidence.c:31: thumbnail.h:20: error: parse error before

Re: [e-users] Evidence Evas

2004-08-07 Thread jerome wilson
to enhance your desktop (and play with). --WilAnJe - Original Message - From: John Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:30:55 -0500 To: Elightenment Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [e-users] Evidence Evas hi, I'm having trouble with compiling Evidence; I'm using

[e-users] evidence possible bug ? or maybe OF

2004-06-17 Thread jacinto calvo sintes
Hi, i had compiled fine evidence in before installed system debianPPC on ibook g3, as I reinstalled few weeks ago, i started to do with e17 again and got all to work fine except few days ago i tried again with evidence and now i can't compile fine. the error is that: .. . . .ft-1.0.so

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-18 Thread Wouter van Marle
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 14:04, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: I checked out the entire e17 tree and compiled almost everything in the order specified on http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/cvsnotes.html using optional configure parameters from README files in directories checked out. You were

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-18 Thread Dhruba Bandopadhyay
Wouter van Marle wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 14:04, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: /I checked out the entire e17 tree and compiled almost everything in the order specified on //_http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/cvsnotes.html_ using optional configure parameters from README files in directories

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-18 Thread Wouter van Marle
Read e17/libs/edje/README and recompile packages it mentions using the configure parameters that it gives you. In my case, that was the key to succeeding with previously failing packages. I had done so already, before compiling first read the README in the dirs. I learnt that from previous

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-17 Thread Hall Stevenson
At 10:25 PM 11/16/2003, Didier Casse wrote: On 16/11/03, at 09:18 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...: On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 04:28, Didier Casse wrote: On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-17 Thread Hall Stevenson
At 11:44 PM 11/16/2003, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: Didier Casse wrote: Use the rpms. I remember that the building process wasn't so successful too. But when I use the rpm with a --nodeps option, it went in~ On Gentoo ?? No thanks... I might download 'em and try rpm2tgz though. Hall, why don't you

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-17 Thread Hall Stevenson
At 08:33 AM 11/17/2003, Andrew Elcock wrote: Do a -pv (pretend with flags) on evidence. Then emerge (manually) each dependancy *apart* from those in e/evidence. then install the e/evidence libs etc from cvs in the usual ./autogen.sh make make install way. I understand that part. I always check

[e-users] Evidence in RH9

2003-11-17 Thread elshadii
Ok so I've tried to follow directions detailed on http://rephorm.com/rephorm/code/efl Although I would love help, my purpose of writing this is to add to the discussion. I am also having problems building evas I think that's were the major jam seems to be conserning the EFL. I have built

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-17 Thread Dhruba Bandopadhyay
Hall Stevenson wrote: At 11:44 PM 11/16/2003, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: Didier Casse wrote: Use the rpms. I remember that the building process wasn't so successful too. But when I use the rpm with a --nodeps option, it went in~ On Gentoo ?? No thanks... I might download 'em and try rpm2tgz

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-16 Thread Didier Casse
On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00723.html I tried it last night myself and didn't get that far... :( 'make' was failing in regards to Evas.h. I did install 'evas v1.0.0' from E's website. I did

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-16 Thread Hall Stevenson
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 04:28, Didier Casse wrote: On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00723.html I tried it last night myself and didn't get that far... :( 'make' was failing in regards to Evas.h. I did

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-16 Thread Didier Casse
On 16/11/03, at 09:18 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...: On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 04:28, Didier Casse wrote: On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00723.html I tried it last night myself and

Re: [e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-16 Thread Dhruba Bandopadhyay
Didier Casse wrote: Use the rpms. I remember that the building process wasn't so successful too. But when I use the rpm with a --nodeps option, it went in~ On Gentoo ?? No thanks... I might download 'em and try rpm2tgz though. Hall, why don't you ask Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]? He's

[e-users] Evidence and RH9

2003-11-14 Thread elshadii
I'm having trouble getting Evidence to work in RH9. I've tried to compile from source and from an rpm but nothing seemes to work. It keeps missing a dependancy from somwhere. Anybody know what might be going on? I'll try and get copy the actual shit it spits at me as soon as I get a chance.

[e-users] Evidence!

2003-10-12 Thread Justin Parker
I am trying to run evidence and have it running but I'm getting this funky crap in return. I get this when I bring it up from a terminal. evidence: backend lib/evidence/backend/fsxs not found! maybe we weren't made installed yet, assuming top build-dir... evidence:

RE: [e-users] Evidence in E

2003-09-02 Thread Bryan Simmons
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toni Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-users] Evidence in E Ton Hoogstraten wrote: Does someone have evidence 0.9.4 or 0.9.6 within Redhat 9 working? I

RE: [e-users] Evidence in E

2003-09-01 Thread Ton Hoogstraten
, Ton -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toni Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-users] Evidence in E Ton Hoogstraten wrote: Does someone have evidence 0.9.4 or 0.9.6 within Redhat 9 working? I got

Re: [e-users] evidence libebg.so.1

2003-05-27 Thread Bradley Reed
On Mon, 26 May 2003 21:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Ace Aguirre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can anyone point me to where i can get libebg.so.1 i've been lookin for a debian package for quite some time now. is there any? this is because i cant unpack rpm files. Have you tried alien to convert rpms to