Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-04-06 Thread Thomas Watson
AM Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups OK, to be clear Pascal and Ian. You are fine moving forward with a single committer group for all of Equinox including p2? Personally I don't see any issues here with merging. We should be using gerrit reviews, espec

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Watson
Tom From: Pascal Rapicault To: Equinox development mailing list Date: 03/24/2016 10:10 PM Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups Sent by:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Well, why not. On 16-03-22 09:50 PM, Ian Bull wrote: +1 Cheers, Ian On Tue,

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-24 Thread Pascal Rapicault
8:25 AM Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups Sent by: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org <mailto:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org> I strongly agree. In fact,

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-22 Thread Ian Bull
>> >> Tom >> >> >> >> >> >> From:Stefan Xenos >> To:Equinox development mailing list >> Date: 03/01/2016 08:25 AM >> Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups >> Sent by:equ

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread Raymond Auge
ist > Date:03/01/2016 08:25 AM > Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups > Sent by:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > -- > > > > I strongly agree. In fact, I'd go farther and merge in p2 as well. >

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread Thomas Watson
I have no objections to merging in p2. But I would like Pascal and other p2 committers to agree first. Tom From: Stefan Xenos To: Equinox development mailing list Date: 03/01/2016 08:25 AM Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups Sent by:equinox

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread Dr. Pavlin Dobrev
+1. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards *Dr. Pavlin Dobrev* ProSyst Software GmbH Research and Development Manager Aachener Str. 222 50931 Cologne Germany _www.prosyst.com_

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread BJ Hargrave
+1   --BJ HargraveSenior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788hargr...@us.ibm.com     - Original message -From: Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM@IBMUSSent by: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.orgTo: "Equinox development

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread Pascal Rapicault
Makes sense to me On 3/1/2016 8:49 AM, Thomas Watson wrote: Right now the equinox project has the following sub-projects, each with their own committer groups rt.equinox - parent project, no real code here, but it does contain the website rt.equinox.framework - where the OSGi framework and Equ

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread Stefan Xenos
I strongly agree. In fact, I'd go farther and merge in p2 as well. Fragmenting the permissions encourages developers to work around problems in the code they have commit rights to rather in the place where the fix really belongs, and makes it unnecessarily hard to do large changes such as rolling w

Re: [equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread Martin Lippert
+1 Cheers, -Martin > Am 01.03.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Thomas Watson : > > Right now the equinox project has the following sub-projects, each with their > own committer groups > > rt.equinox - parent project, no real code here, but it does contain the > website > rt.equinox.framework - where th

[equinox-dev] Merge of equinox committer groups

2016-03-01 Thread Thomas Watson
Right now the equinox project has the following sub-projects, each with their own committer groups rt.equinox - parent project, no real code here, but it does contain the website rt.equinox.framework - where the OSGi framework and Equinox native launcher lives rt.equinox.bundles - where everyth