i installed xcdroast and gtoaster. both don't recognize my IDE burner.
apparently, i need scsi emulation. does anybody know (off the top of their
head) what the kernel module for scsi emulation is? and what parameters i
need to pass it?
On Monday 29 October 2001 08:22, Justin Bengtson wrote:
i installed xcdroast and gtoaster. both don't recognize my IDE
burner. apparently, i need scsi emulation. does anybody know (off
the top of their head) what the kernel module for scsi emulation is?
and what parameters i need to pass
Is there connectivity there? If people are worried about trust, I can
bring that net-PC and install a fresh system right there before we
start.
Do we have a wiki on this yet?
TimH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Seth Cohn
Sent:
Not neccessary really.
Most keysigning parties are sans computer even.
We will have a large number of keyless people, so
making a way to generate keys makes sense, but
beyond that, why?
Seth
--- Tim Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not even pots? I could donate my earthlink
account for a few
MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT
The Portland Linux/Unix Group
will meet
7 PM Thursday Nov 1, 2001
at
Portland State University
Outpost has the card for 349$
Specs:
* Bus System Interface Type: 64-bit PCI, 32-bit compatible
* System bus Rate: 266 MB/sec
* Data Transfer Method: Bus Mastering
* SCSI Data Transer Rate: 160 MB/sec, on each chanel
* Internal Connectors: Two 68-pin for LVD SCSI, One 50-pin
hmmm. cant remember now. could be a 29160.
in that case, I'll sell the whole bundle for 100$
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Christopher Maujean wrote:
Outpost has the card for 349$
Specs:
* Bus System Interface Type: 64-bit PCI, 32-bit compatible
* System bus Rate: 266
Did I mention you can call me at 344-8575 until 6pm...
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Christopher Maujean wrote:
Outpost has the card for 349$
Specs:
* Bus System Interface Type: 64-bit PCI, 32-bit compatible
* System bus Rate: 266 MB/sec
* Data Transfer Method: Bus
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:30:24AM -0700, Mark Bigler wrote:
On Monday 29 October 2001 08:22, Justin Bengtson wrote:
i installed xcdroast and gtoaster. both don't recognize my IDE
burner. apparently, i need scsi emulation. does anybody know (off
the top of their head) what the kernel
alright, where's the video hardware compatibility list?
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Meuser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EUG-LUG:3503] Re: cd burning
I find it easier to just build a kernel without IDE CD support
Cleveland
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bengtson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [EUG-LUG:3504] Re: cd burning
alright, where's the video hardware compatibility list?
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Meuser
Sorry. I just had to.
Try here: http://lhd.datapower.com/
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bengtson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [EUG-LUG:3504] Re: cd burning
alright, where's the video hardware compatibility list?
actually, i'd like the one for openBSD. jacob's been trying to get me to go
to openBSD. i'm getting sick of it, so i figured i'd just give it a go so i
could start bugging him, instead of the other way around.
of course, if he's right. the man pages are just so damn good that i won't
have to
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 02:49:26PM -0800, Justin Bengtson wrote:
alright, where's the video hardware compatibility list?
For OpenBSD? http://www.OpenBSD.org/i386.html
Basically, anything that X supports that doesn't need extra special
kernel support (Intel AGP, for example) will work with X
Justin Bengtson wrote:
alright, where's the video hardware compatibility list?
AFAIK, the same video hardware that is compatible with XFree86 under
Linux is compatible under OpenBSD.
For some reason, OpenBSD is still shipping with XFree86 3.x as the
default (but 4.x is available as an
Actually that's backwards. XFree86 4.x was the default in 2.9 and is
also the default in 3.0. 3.3.6 was still an option in 2.9, but I
haven't looked to see if it is still in 3.
The CD cover for 2.9 said 3.3.6, but I think it was printed before 4.x
went in.
TimH
-Original Message-
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:12:17PM -0800, Justin Bengtson wrote:
of course, if he's right. the man pages are just so damn good that i won't
have to bug him at all...
I'm not the only one to bug, there's Tim and KBob also :)
BTW, KBob, don't know if you've gotten a response on the redirect
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:45:25PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
For some reason, OpenBSD is still shipping with XFree86 3.x as the
default (but 4.x is available as an option), so you could also check
the release notes for XFree86 3.6.
Well, it kinda has both (3.3.6 servers 4.1.0 server + all
Since both of our OpenBSD experts are reading mail this afternoon,
let me pose the question that I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] earlier
today.
Kbob
-
I'm building a firewall/router
Well I haven't set this up yet, I'm still writing my ruleset.
Is that line EXACTLY as it is in the config file? If so, shouldn't you
put it all on one line or continue with a \ character?
TimH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bob
Well, I've been writing my ruleset for PF and I like it so far; soon
I'll be confident enough to give real help on it.
It's funny to think how far this firewall has come in under 2 years.
It started out as an OpenBSD 2.7 box using the bridge interface and IPF
before IPF could even do
actually, i'm going to have to set up a test computer for this. i like
changing OS's (well, i may not like it but i find myself doing it...) so
much i might as well get a computer dedicated to the purpose. time to hit
up the refurb shop...
wait a sec... doesn't openBSD support m68K? would it
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 04:08:01PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
Since both of our OpenBSD experts are reading mail this afternoon,
let me pose the question that I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] earlier
today.
Kbob
I'll look at this more in-depth (but I must
never mind. won't work with the 680LC40 chipset. anybody have a spare
68040 for sale?
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bengtson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [EUG-LUG:3518] RE: OpenBSD hardware compat list was Re: cd
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 04:22:37PM -0800, Tim Howe wrote:
Well, I've been writing my ruleset for PF and I like it so far; soon
I'll be confident enough to give real help on it.
It's funny to think how far this firewall has come in under 2 years.
It started out as an OpenBSD 2.7 box
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 04:22:58PM -0800, Justin Bengtson wrote:
actually, i'm going to have to set up a test computer for this. i like
changing OS's (well, i may not like it but i find myself doing it...)
hehe, so did I until I installed OpenBSD =]
so
much i might as well get a computer
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 04:22:58PM -0800, Justin Bengtson wrote:
wait a sec... doesn't openBSD support m68K? would it be possible to put it
on an old quadra 610?
I guess this might help - http://www.openbsd.org/mac68k.html
Quadra 610 is listed.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would assume Ethereal could read them unless I was shown otherwise. I
have read all kinds of stuff with it.
I would assume that in the near future plain text logs will happen. PF
is still raw.
TimH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
--
Christopher Maujean IT DirectorPremierelink Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.premierelink.com
--
GnuPg/PGP: 0x5DE74D38
Fingerprint: 91D4 09FE 18D0 27C1 A857 0E45 F8A4 7858 5DE7 4D38
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Justin Bengtson wrote:
never mind. won't work with the 680LC40 chipset. anybody have a spare
68040 for sale?
I've seen them for sale at the university.
-Chris
Anyone planning on attending this? The presentation sounds interesting.
If a few people are going, we should set up a car-pool so everyone's not
driving...
Anyone headed for the AMD Tech Tour tomorrow? I'm going. Not sure when I'm
leaving yet but I'm going straight from work.
On Monday 29 October 2001 08:12 pm, somebody wrote:
Anyone planning on attending this? The presentation sounds interesting.
If a few people are going, we should set up a
Mr. O,
Can you elaborate on the tech tour of give us a link?
Kahli
Jacob Meuser wrote:
Well, it kinda has both (3.3.6 servers 4.1.0 server + all the libraries
and other programs are from 4.1.0[...]
Okay, I picked up some misinformation. Sorry.
Another OpenBSD X question.
In days of yore, X was installed at /usr/{bin,lib,include}/X11.
Nowadays, it's in
Jacob Meuser wrote:
BTW, KBob, don't know if you've gotten a response on the redirect question,
but you might want to use dc instead of de for the 4-port card.
Hey, I just got it working! I used the dc driver as you suggested, and
once I'd figured out what was wrong, I made the de driver
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:50:59PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
In days of yore, X was installed at /usr/{bin,lib,include}/X11.
Nowadays, it's in /usr/X11R6. Other distributions have links from
/usr/{bin,lib,include}/X11 to the appropriate directories inside
/usr/X11R6. But my OpenBSD
It's a vendor thing I guess. The AMD fall tech tour. www.amd.com/TeamAMD for
more info. Apparently this is thier second event within a short time in the
Portland area. I'm attending this because my boss is going to Comdex without
me :-( . At least that's my reasoning. That's about all I know.
37 matches
Mail list logo
