On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:19:14PM -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
> Speaking of all this, isn't it accurate to say that telnet'ing in to
> ANYONE else's mail servers, without their expressed consent, violates
> some of the more recent laws (dmca or patriot act?)...?? Granted most
> people on this list
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Ben Barrett wrote:
> Really, the example showing connection to a mail server is not an evil
> one, but I would think it wise to provide a disclaimer, stating that "I
> am sysadmin on this box" or "I have permission, so only try this on YOUR
> OWN box". Not that I've heard of an
On Thursday 06 February 2003 02:19 pm, Ben Barrett wrote:
: Speaking of all this, isn't it accurate to say that telnet'ing in to
: ANYONE else's mail servers, without their expressed consent, violates
: some of the more recent laws (dmca or patriot act?)...?? Granted most
: people on this list are
Speaking of all this, isn't it accurate to say that telnet'ing in to
ANYONE else's mail servers, without their expressed consent, violates
some of the more recent laws (dmca or patriot act?)...?? Granted most
people on this list are rebels and all, but wouldn't it be wise to
advise people AGAINST
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 07:44:00PM -0800, Horst wrote:
>
>
> Ben, you put together some interesting thoughts and links (I just
>finished the motherjones article and had to resist the temptation of
>quoting about half of it right here.
> Instead, let's get concrete and ask the best ISP in town (EFN)
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 07:44:00PM -0800, Horst wrote:
> Ben, you put together some interesting thoughts and links (I just
> finished the motherjones article and had to resist the temptation of
> quoting about half of it right here.
> Instead, let's get concrete and ask the best ISP in town (EFN)
Ben, you put together some interesting thoughts and links (I just
finished the motherjones article and had to resist the temptation of
quoting about half of it right here.
Instead, let's get concrete and ask the best ISP in town (EFN) a few
questions:
~ for EFN ~~~
I'm glad you posted the google-watch links, that's very interesting
information. I am concerned by the popular belief that IP addresses
somehow identify a single computer, however!!!
In many cases, a single IP address is shared (say, via NAT) by dozens or
even hundreds of computers. It can also b
