Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 24, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:
>
> It will always be twice as expensive in fuel to run a fuel cell vehicle.
This statement puzzled me. What about future pricing of "fuel" for a BEV would
cause the price to rise so much?
Or do you expect the co
My comment to Toyota:
I have been an electric vehicle and alternative energy enthusiast &
professional for two decades. It was 1997 when a Kummerow electric vehicle
powered by a Zinc air battery went 1000 miles on a charge. However it took
three days and 4 drivers. It was a golf cart like ve
Peri Hartman via EV wrote:
I'm not so sure FCVs are an ally to EVs. Whether FCVs go away on their
own or not, to build the infrastructure will cost billions and then
billions more of subsidies to generate hydrogen at a competitive price.
Once that infrastructure exists, it is a beast, not an ally
Peri
-- Original Message --
From: "Jorg Brown via EV"
To: "Robert Bruninga" ; "Electric Vehicle Discussion
List"
Sent: 23-Apr-15 9:11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell
vehicle
Surely, rather than fighting _against_ FCVs, we should
On Apr 23, 2015, at 9:10 PM, EVDL Administrator via EV
wrote:
> On 24 Apr 2015 at 1:08, Peri Hartman via EV wrote:
>
>> Eventually people will wise up to the taxes, aka subsidies, needed to
>> support a fuel cell auto industry when they start wondering where
>> their tax payments are going. Ed
Surely, rather than fighting _against_ FCVs, we should be fighting _with_
them, against our common enemy the internal combustion engine?
https://youtu.be/kHHitXxH-us?t=44s
(I'm not a big fan of FCVs, but it seems to me they will go away on their
own; we don't need to hasten their demise, other th
On 24 Apr 2015 at 1:08, Peri Hartman via EV wrote:
> Eventually people will wise up to the taxes, aka subsidies, needed to
> support a fuel cell auto industry when they start wondering where
> their tax payments are going. Education will shorten that time.
Watch out, that's a sharp two-edged sw
On Apr 23, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Cor van de Water via EV wrote:
> [T]his industry has put it into law that you can get
> credits for providing a zero-emission long range vehicle[]
I think it would make the contrast between BEVs and FCVs much starker if the
requirement wasn't tailpipe emissions
an de Water via EV"
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List"
Sent: 23-Apr-15 5:48:18 PM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell
vehicle
I have the impression that no matter how hard we argue here until we
are blue in the face
(and it will edify some and giv
EVDL] Tell Toyota what you think of their Fool cell vehicle
Bob, thanks for writing in about your effort and the response. It spurred me
into action, I went there and submitted my thoughts on the Prius (I have an
'02, and on the newest models), but more so on the FCV vs BEV debate. Perhaps
m
Bob, thanks for writing in about your effort and the response. It
spurred me into action, I went there and submitted my thoughts on the
Prius (I have an '02, and on the newest models), but more so on the FCV
vs BEV debate. Perhaps many of us could sway them, eventually.
Thanks again,
-Chris
On
Earlier today, I got an email from Toyota promoting their Fool Cell
vehicle (with no reply address).
So I went to the Toyota web site and found the CONTACT link and filled out
an on-line email telling them to stop throwing good money after bad in
last years ideas (Fool cells) and to come out with
12 matches
Mail list logo