Hi,
Am 24.10.2016 um 09:11 schrieb Moser Helmut:
> Can anybody here please answer the original question (besides tips about
> distro change)?
> It's very important for me too to know what to do after November 1st as I
> have several 13.1 machines sitting there.
Seeing how we were struggling up
Am 13.05.2016 um 17:23 schrieb Noel Power:
> On 13/05/16 16:03, Manfred Schwarb wrote:
>> Am 12.05.2016 um 22:56 schrieb Manfred Schwarb:
> [...]
>> There is now a repository for 13.1:
>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/npower:/update-os13.1-samba/standard/x86_64/
>> I tested it,
Hi,
Am 04.05.2016 um 06:41 schrieb Ronny Peine:
> Hello Evergreen-Team,
>
> as I can see in https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952611 most
> likely all of the lately securityfixes for ntpd are missing in openSUSE
> 13.1 (since Mai 2015). Would it be possible to maybe have the ntpd
>
___
Evergreen mailing list
Evergreen@lists.rosenauer.org
http://lists.rosenauer.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen
Am 16.04.2016 um 13:11 schrieb Christian Boltz:
> Hello,
>
> Am Samstag, 16. April 2016, 12:40:47 CEST schrieb Michal Kubecek:
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:24:03AM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
>
> FYI: a quick test of the updated packages on one of my 13.1 machines
> looks good.
>
>> But I'm
Am 16.04.2016 um 12:40 schrieb Michal Kubecek:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:24:03AM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
>>> The samba update is submitted now to
>>> openSUSE:Evergreen:Maintenance:4627 If you are going to submit the
>>> AppArmor profile update, using this incident would be IMHO the best
Am 07.02.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Manfred Hollstein:
> Hi there,
>
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2016, 17:27:06 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 03, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>>
>>> Please check if this helps.
>>
>> Thanks. At least the i586 part of 13.1 is in "blocked/scheduled" state
>> again. I think
Am 03.02.2016 um 16:46 schrieb Olaf Hering:
> Not sure if this is already an Evergreen or still regular update thing.
>
> openSUSE_13.1x86_64 unresolvable: nothing provides
> this-is-only-for-build-envs needed by libudev-mini1
> nothing provides this-is-only-for-build-envs
Am 31.01.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> No
>
> OSC branch -M openSUSE:13.1:Update phpMyAdmin
>
> Then OSC SR to send it back.
>
> Branxhing from maintennance projects ist almost always incorrect.
hmm, so it seems it did work fine though.
Yes, it's not the usual case but the above
