Eric,
It may not explain gravity but your phenomenon seems strikingly similar
(with its repulsive push picture) to the concept of cosmological constant or
quintessence, which has a great deal (it is believed) to do with the
expanding universe and its fate. See
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/1
Hi there,
Well, it is a good try, but it has been proven wrong already indeed.
To see a better refutal, see Feynman's popular book 'QED'.
For instance, that theory seems even better once you realize that it
also acounts for the inverse-square law.
But the main flaw, if I recall it, is that object
Without inventing an "i-graviton" the idea has been put forward by a
late collegue of mine Dr. Istvan Vas of Hungary, in the early 1950s.
He spoke about a "push" without identifying its nature - as a force, because
a general pull is 'counterproductive' an difficult to explain, as Newton's
concerns
Dear Russel,
What I am considering is this from
http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~svozil/publ/1999-embed-jfulltext.pdf. The aspect of
a quantum system that can be embedded into an atomic Boolean algebra or
related classical structure.
Could this partial image of a QM system be sufficient, given th
Ron:
do you believe there are non-virtual gravitons?
John Mikes
- Original Message -
From: "Ron McFarland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Black Holes and Gravity Carrier
> Combine my response to 2 responses ...
>
> On
Eric Hawthorne, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
> Is it possible to model gravity as space being filled with an
> all-directional flux of "inverse gravitons"?
Again, this is not really a multiverse question. I hate to be negative,
but there are other forums for exploring nonstandard physics concept
Eric Cavalcanti wrote:
But the main flaw, if I recall it, is that objects moving around in space
would feel a larger flux of 'iGravitons' coming against the direction
of movement, causing a decrease in velocity. So much for inertia...
Ok but let's say (for fun) that the iGravitons were all mo
Hal Finney wrote:
Again, this is not really a multiverse question. I hate to be negative,
but there are other forums for exploring nonstandard physics concepts.
Alright I take your chastisement somewhat, while also grumbling a bit
about list-fascism.
For one thing it's possible that such a mo
A lot of terminology here that I'm not familiar with. I'd have to be
convinced that its worth the effort of learning this language before I
could pass a comment on this proposal.
Cheers
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:08:25AM -0500, Stephen Paul King wro
Oops, I realize that it wasn't in 'QED' but in the 'Lectures' that I
read that...
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Cavalcanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:18 AM
Subject: Fw: Gravity Carrier - could gravity be push with shadows not pull?
Caveat: This post will likely demonstrate my complete lack of advanced
physics education.
But here goes anyway.
Is it possible to model gravity as space being filled with an
all-directional flux of "inverse gravitons"? These would be
particles which:
1. Zoom around EVERYWHERE with a uniform dis
11 matches
Mail list logo
