On 30 Aug 2005, at 05:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The misinterpretations compounded and intermingled so much I decided to cut to the meat of it.. I suspect that this dialogue will end in the usual way. Being ignoredThe well worn path of COMP and all the things it says, the idea that a
On 29 Aug 2005, at 18:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[GK] You ARE doing something speculative whether you admit it or not! And I don't really have to study your argument because it is derived from premises that, you already admitted, are incompatible with the conclusions you claim. Please explain
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0508429
Tegmark's essay was not well received (perhaps Godfrey didn't like it? :-) )
How did it all begin?
Authors: Max Tegmark
Comments: 6 pages, 6 figs, essay for 2005 Young Scholars Competition in
honor of Charles Townes; received Dishonorable Mention
How did
Hi Russell,
Still have not had a chance to look up your book
but hope to do so shortly.
Godfrey Kurtz
(New Brunswick, NJ)
-Original Message-
From: Russell Standish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:44:00
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:01:42 +0200
Subject: Re: subjective reality
On 29 Aug 2005, at 18:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[GK]
You ARE doing something speculative whether you
Bruno,
I don't quite follow Colin's objections to your derivation but since
you
mention me here I have to point out that he clearly read a lot more
of it than I ever did. So you are being unfair in comparing us in this.
He also appears a lot more annoyed with you than I am...
Godfrey Kurtz
I wade into this dispute with trepidation, because I think it is for
the most part incomprehensible. But I believe I see one place where
there was a miscommunication and I hope to clear it up.
Godfrey Kurtz wrote, to Bruno Marchal:
You ARE doing something speculative whether you admit it or
This is a teaser. Why did Tegmark's paper receive Dishonorable Mention?
Who is Godfrey?
- Original Message -
From: Saibal Mitra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 6:14 AM
Subject: How did it all begin?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:26:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[GK]
You ARE doing something speculative whether you admit it or not! And
I
don't really have to study your argument because
it is derived from premises that, you already admitted, are
incompatible with the
I think this is a classic example of the problem of 'isms. In your
dichotomy below, I believe the wave function does indeed encode the
state of our knowledge - I say as much in my book. Yet I would say my
ensemble-based approach is Platonic, not Positivist.
Hmm, which am I, Platonist or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:01:42 +0200
Subject: Re: subjective reality
On 29 Aug 2005, at 18:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are also speculating
11 matches
Mail list logo