Hi Brent and Bruno,
From: meekerdb
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 1:44 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: On the Sequencing of Observer Moments
On 5/20/2011 3:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2011, at 18:54, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/18/2011 9:21 AM, Stephen Paul Ki
On 5/20/2011 3:59 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2011, at 19:47, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Rex,
A very good point! There must be a place for "false memories" in
our modal logics.
Indeed. and G* proves DBf. Lies and falsities abounds in the mind of
the average Löbian machines.
An
On 5/20/2011 3:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2011, at 18:54, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/18/2011 9:21 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Brent,
Interesting! If we follow this idea, that memory is not
necessary for consciousness, then consciousness does not require a
persistent structure t
Raphael Bousso and Leonard Susskind appear to mix the concepts of the
multiverse with the idea of wave collapse, e.g., "For example, we might
choose S to be an electron and E to be the inanimate laboratory. The
system's wave function collapses when the electron becomes entangled with
some detector.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1105/1105.3796v1.pdf.
I am curious what people think of this, not just from the DM Point of
view.
Ronald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To pos
On 18 May 2011, at 19:47, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Rex,
A very good point! There must be a place for "false memories" in
our modal logics.
Indeed. and G* proves DBf. Lies and falsities abounds in the mind of
the average Löbian machines.
Could these be included in the Bp & p wher
On 18 May 2011, at 18:54, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/18/2011 9:21 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Brent,
Interesting! If we follow this idea, that memory is not
necessary for consciousness, then consciousness does not require a
persistent structure to supervene upon. No?
Onward!
Stephen
Dear Stephen,
On 18 May 2011, at 18:10, Stephen Paul King wrote:
I am interested in more of your thinking on several ideas that you
mention in this post.
1) The 8 hypostases as N-OM; N = 1 - 8
I suggest you to read the sane04 paper where they are explained in the
part "2", or the "P
8 matches
Mail list logo