On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:02 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/8/2011 8:08 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:01 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/8/2011 7:35 PM, Constantine Pseudonymous wrote:
it makes so much sense.
the doctrine of physicalism is
...the only theoretical construct that could possibly matter in this
case would be one derived from experience and is intrinsically
realizable through a certain methodology. You didn't say anything
about idealistic. Derived from experience and intrinsically
realizable sounds like the
On 7/8/2011 11:35 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
In other words: What do we make of the fact that these predictions were
successful (or not)? What does this mean with respect to our beliefs about
what kinds of things exist?
The things we take to exist are the elements of our successful models.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:47 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/8/2011 11:35 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
In other words: What do we make of the fact that these predictions were
successful (or not)? What does this mean with respect to our beliefs
about
what kinds of things exist?
On 08 Jul 2011, at 23:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/8/2011 2:04 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The usual analogy is that your mind is your software, and your
brain is the main operating system. It is obviously Turing
universal (once you know the definition and think a little bit),
and the comp
On 09 Jul 2011, at 06:06, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/8/2011 8:57 PM, B Soroud wrote:
I'm saying that perhaps the philosophic foundations and presupps of
physics are erroneous and something alternative is needed...
I am saying we need to ground physics in an idealist metaphysics
That's where my
On 09 Jul 2011, at 07:07, Colin Geoffrey Hales wrote:
Down the bottom if you dare there be dragons... :-)
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com on behalf of Jason Resch
Sent: Sat 7/9/2011 1:23 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: COMP
On 09 Jul 2011, at 09:10, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:04:56PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Jul 2011, at 03:39, B Soroud wrote:
I mean if you went back to classical greece... or classical
india could it have been predicted or shown to deduced?
Excellent
Sure, it would be great to have improved synthetic bodies, but I have
no reason to believe that depth and quality of consciousness is
independent from substance. If I have an artificial heart, that
artificiality may not affect me as much as having an artificial leg,
however, an artificial brain
Bruno, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by vitalism but if its
what I have in mind. then it died erroneously. I don't think
notions of qi and prana are without foundation far from it. There
is a sense in which, if vitalism died, that was a mistake but I am
not exactly sure of
On 09 Jul 2011, at 19:06, Constantine Pseudonymous wrote:
Bruno, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by vitalism but if its
what I have in mind. then it died erroneously. I don't think
notions of qi and prana are without foundation far from it. There
is a sense in which, if
On 7/9/2011 12:00 AM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:47 AM, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/8/2011 11:35 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
In other words: What do we make of the fact that these predictions were
successful (or not)? What does this mean with
On 09 Jul 2011, at 06:02, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/8/2011 8:08 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:01 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 7/8/2011 7:35 PM, Constantine Pseudonymous wrote:
it makes so much sense.
the doctrine of physicalism is in the least on the same
if you really believe in reality you should commit suicide... if a
reality remains there is reality
if no reality remains... well then all is base stupidity.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jul 2011, at 06:06, meekerdb wrote:
On
How is it you are so sure that the organization is only part of it?
Because it makes sense to me that organization cannot create functions
which are not inherent potentials of whatever it is you are
organizing. It doesn't matter how many ping pong balls you have or how
you organize them, even if
15 matches
Mail list logo
