[SPK]
> > It seems to me that we have to take the environment of the system
> >> into account, so we have to have a {environment> in the equation, no?
> >> From what I can tell, cul de sac's would have 3p consequences that
> >> would have an effect on the distribution of branches. Maybe we s
On 10/27/2011 4:56 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
With comp, and I think with QM,
there is no escapes from being conscious, in a way or another. I
don't
like that, but then it is a consequence of those theories.
Have you never been unconscious? Concussion? Anesthesia?
Brent
--
You received this mes
[BM]
The QTI, or the more general comp immortality, or arithmetical
immortality is a complex subject, if only because it depends on
what
you mean by "you".
[NP]
Can you be more specific on this?
[BM]
Do you know Kripke semantic? A Kripke frame is just a set (of
elements
called worlds) with an
On 10/27/2011 3:26 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
[SPK]
Are we sure that this ordering, at the level of the state vectors,
really matters? We are, after all, only considering observables that
mutually commute and thus ordering should be irrelevant.
[NP]
Hi Stephen. I stressed the order because it
[SPK]
Are we sure that this ordering, at the level of the state vectors,
> really matters? We are, after all, only considering observables that
> mutually commute and thus ordering should be irrelevant.
>
[NP]
Hi Stephen. I stressed the order because it is how the cat perceives
events and there
[JR]
I think such cul de sacs exist only from third person perspectives.
E.g.,
the experimenter's view of what happens to the cat. When considering
the
perspective from the first person (cat) perspective, there are no cul
de
sacs for a much simpler reason: The cat might be mistaken, dreaming,
or e
[CW]
I can't help with that unfortunately. My own TOE explains why QM may
be a misinterpretation to begin with (even though the observations and
predictions of QM are of course valid).
[NP]
Ok thanks for your comments Craig. I would be interested in your
TOE. If you have explained it on this
On Oct 27, 12:11 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> >> Indirectly, the larynx must be connected to the optic nerve or we
> >> wouldn't be able to describe what we see. Is that not obvious?
>
> > Indirectly everything is connected to everythin
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>> Indirectly, the larynx must be connected to the optic nerve or we
>> wouldn't be able to describe what we see. Is that not obvious?
>
> Indirectly everything is connected to everything. The foot is
> connected to the ass indirectly too. So
On 26 Oct 2011, at 01:00, Nick Prince wrote:
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
I’m trying to get a picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of
differentiation works – especially in relation to QTI. With a
standard treatment it looks as if there might be cul de sacs for a
dying cat. However I
On 10/25/2011 7:00 PM, Nick Prince wrote:
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
I’m trying to get a picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of
differentiation works – especially in relation to QTI. With a
standard treatment it looks as if there might be cul de sacs for a
dying cat. However I thin
Jason Resch-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nick Prince
> wrote:
>
>> QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
>>
>> I’m trying to get a picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of
>> differentiation works – especially in relation to QTI. With a
>> standard treatment it looks as if there
12 matches
Mail list logo
