Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com wrote: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation I’m trying to get a picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of differentiation works – especially in relation to QTI. With a standard treatment it looks as if there might be cul

Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Nick Prince
On Oct 29, 1:53 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com wrote: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation I’m trying to get a  picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of differentiation works – especially in

Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
On Oct 30, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com wrote: Maybe you are thinking of Tegmark level 1 or level 2 type multiverses here, in which case I agree. What I was doing in my analysis was thinking about QM type 3 multiverses only. Let's pretend that these are the

Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Nick Prince
On Oct 29, 6:44 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 30, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com wrote: Maybe you are thinking of Tegmark level 1 or level 2 type multiverses here, in which case I agree.  What I was doing in my analysis was

Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Nick Prince
On Oct 29, 6:44 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 30, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com wrote: Maybe you are thinking of Tegmark level 1 or level 2 type multiverses here, in which case I agree.  What I was doing in my analysis was

Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Russell Standish
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:17:17AM -0700, Nick Prince wrote: Hi Stathis Maybe you are thinking of Tegmark level 1 or level 2 type multiverses here, in which case I agree. What I was doing in my analysis was thinking about QM type 3 multiverses only. Let's pretend that these are the only

Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Nick Prince
On Oct 27, 11:52 am, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote: Jason Resch-2 wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.comwrote: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation I’m trying to get a  picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of differentiation

Kindle edition of Theory of Nothing

2011-10-29 Thread Russell Standish
Just to let everybody know that Theory of Nothing is now available from the Kindle store. Its now also second edition - mostly typo corrections, but minor changes in a couple of points as well. Pass it on! Cheers --

Re: QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation

2011-10-29 Thread Nick Prince
[NP] Maybe you are thinking of Tegmark level 1 or level 2 type multiverses here, in which case I agree.  What I was doing in my analysis was thinking about QM type 3 multiverses only. Let's pretend that these are the only variety for the moment, then my analysis does indicate that cul