Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> I would rather call this consciousness.
>>
>> Indeed I agree with Dan that it is quite accurate to say that there
>> is no
>> person in the sense that experience is not personal, it doesn't
>> "belong" to
>> anyone (but it is very intimate with itself nontheless).
>
In a message dated 11/8/2011 12:36:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com writes:
This really puts the suffering we have/had to endure into perspective, and
would solve the problem of evil. Of course consciousnss is going to
experience a very rough start (which constit
Akin to the idea of the technological singularity, a point in time at which
technology becomes so powerful that all aspects of our experiences are
fundamentally transformed (mainly due to intelligence enhancement), I
propose a consciousness singularity:
A point in time at which consciousness becom
On 07 Nov 2011, at 21:02, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
But if you realize that there has never been a person to begin with,
But this contradicts immediately my present consciousness feeling. I
am currently in the state of wanting to drink water, so I am pretty
sure that there exis
meekerdb wrote:
>
> On 11/7/2011 12:02 PM, benjayk wrote:
>> I think we only fear the elimination of personhood because we confuse
>> being
>> conscious as an ego with being conscious. We somehow think that if we in
>> the
>> state of feeling to be a seperate individual cease to exist, we as
>>
meekerdb wrote:
>
> On 11/7/2011 9:50 AM, benjayk wrote:
>> meekerdb wrote:
>>> >
>>> > How great was that?
>> I don't know. Being a fetus might be a peaceful experience, or like
>> sleep.
>> But the point is that it doesn't matter how great the experience was,
>
> So what's your evidence
6 matches
Mail list logo
