If you see the image in the mirror and interact with it, then there has to
be something conscious somewhere. Just like a human controlling a remote
control car. The consciousness might exist somewhere else, but the car can
behave as intelligently as a human.
Jason
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:55
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 2:53:53 AM UTC-4, Jason wrote:
If you see the image in the mirror and interact with it, then there has to
be something conscious somewhere. Just like a human controlling a remote
control car. The consciousness might exist somewhere else, but the car can
The Platonic basis of Relativity, quantum entanglement, and superluminal
communication
The relativity of spacetime and the evidence of quantum nonlocality
are aberrations fom classical physics, which is based on Newtonian
physics, where space and time are absolute quantities. But these
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 5:01:49 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, April 5, 2013 6:47:00 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Craig Weinberg
Hi
What is a Substance ? What is a Man ?
COMMENT: Leibniz talks of corporeal substances in the 1680s but mostly drops
talk of aggregate substances by monadology and focuses on indivisible simple
substances - the monads. The soul is the substance that gives the brain, or in
fact whole body,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
this is an article about research published in PLoS ONE, a peer-reviewed
journal with a high impact factor ( 4).
I confess I've never heard of PLoS ONE, but maybe that is just my a
reflection of my ignorance, so I
Fingelkurts, A., Fingelkurts, A., and Neves, C. (2010). “Natural World
Physical, Brain Operational, and Mind Phenomenal Space-Time”. *Physics
of Life Reviews* 7(2): 195-249.
http://scireprints.lu.lv/141/1/Fingelkurts_Space-time_in_Physics_brain_and_mind.pdf
“We would like to discuss the
I like that diagram, and I think its a step in the right direction...
but...
it does not explain why phenomenal consciousness should be considered to
resemble space-time. It really doesn't. To the contrary, spatiotemporal
memories merge seamlessly with imaginary places and times, or non-places
On 4/6/2013 10:45 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Fingelkurts, A., Fingelkurts, A., and Neves, C. (2010). “Natural World Physical, Brain
Operational, and Mind Phenomenal Space-Time”. *Physics of Life Reviews* 7(2): 195-249.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 6:39 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
this is an article about research published in PLoS ONE, a peer-reviewed
journal with a high impact factor ( 4).
I confess I've never heard of
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 6:46:37 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 4/6/2013 10:45 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Fingelkurts, A., Fingelkurts, A., and Neves, C. (2010). �Natural World
Physical, Brain
Operational, and Mind Phenomenal Space-Time�. *Physics of Life
Reviews* 7(2): 195-249.
Ok, here's my modified version of Fig 11
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/33ost_diagram.jpg
Craig
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 1:45:12 PM UTC-4, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Fingelkurts, A., Fingelkurts, A., and Neves, C. (2010). “Natural World
Physical, Brain Operational, and
12 matches
Mail list logo