On 22/04/2016 2:46 pm, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Bruce Kellett
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:
On 22/04/2016 12:53 pm, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Kellett
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:
The poi
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
> On 22/04/2016 12:53 pm, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> The point here is that some combinations of results are forbidden. How
>> can this happen?
>>
>
> By the appropriate matching
On 22/04/2016 12:53 pm, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Kellett
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:
On 22/04/2016 5:17 am, Jesse Mazer wrote:
You seem to be saying this is impossible in principle, and you're
confident enough of this to dismiss the
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
> On 22/04/2016 5:17 am, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
>> On 21/04/2016 1:34 am, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Kellett <
>> bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
On 22/04/2016 5:17 am, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Bruce Kellett
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:
On 21/04/2016 1:34 am, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Kellett
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>>
wrote:
So, the
On 22/04/2016 3:09 am, smitra wrote:
On 21-04-2016 08:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 21/04/2016 3:26 pm, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 07:36, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 20/04/2016 3:21 pm, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 03:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 20/04/2016 6:56 am, smitra wrote:
The mistake made is
On 20-04-2016 21:16, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Saibal,
what makes you think that we can deduct (know??) anything rightfully
about the REAL WORLD into our feable human mind? You may LIKE more the
QM than the classical versions, but that is no verification.
We obtain(ed) SOME input about the 'WORLD
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
> On 21/04/2016 1:34 am, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
>> So, the fact that these simulated results were supposed to have come from
>> an entangled singlet pair has not been used anywhere in
On 21 Apr 2016, at 07:26, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 07:36, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 20/04/2016 3:21 pm, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 03:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 20/04/2016 6:56 am, smitra wrote:
The mistake made is to invoke classical reasoning after the
measurements are made. If the choic
On 21-04-2016 08:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 21/04/2016 3:26 pm, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 07:36, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 20/04/2016 3:21 pm, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 03:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 20/04/2016 6:56 am, smitra wrote:
The mistake made is to invoke classical reasoning after t
On 21-04-2016 07:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/20/2016 10:34 PM, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 07:49, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/19/2016 10:21 PM, smitra wrote:
On 20-04-2016 03:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 20/04/2016 6:56 am, smitra wrote:
The mistake made is to invoke classical reasoning after th
11 matches
Mail list logo
