RE: My model, comp, and the Second Law

Hi everyone: Unfortunately I have been very ill for the last 15 months or so. I am working on this project again and hope to post soon. Hal Ruhl From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of auxon Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017

Re: A profound lack of profundity

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​> ​ > If there is no indeterminacy, what is the bet in Helsinki? > ​That is a excellent question! It's never been clear what the bet back in Helsinki was, but it's your thought experiment not mine so you tell me. ​ >> ​>>

Re: A profound lack of profundity

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > ​> ​ > Nobody expect one answer , but everybody can see that BOTH agrees having > one obtained one answer, > ​Hmm ...does the Moscow man really believe the correct answer to the Helsinki man's question "What city will I

Re: A profound lack of profundity

On 06 Aug 2017, at 22:41, John Clark wrote: ​> ​The rat thinks, "I will get a reward if I go through this door". The copies of the rat think, "great, I got the reward", or "no reward, I'm disappointed, ​Yes, the 2 copies saw different things when they opened their duplicating chamber

Re: A profound lack of profundity

On 07 Aug 2017, at 00:25, John Clark wrote: On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​> ​you don't give any credit to what both copies say. I do give them credit, I give BOTH copies ​equal ​credit We are all OK with this. and that's why it's so silly