On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 1:17:22 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/5/2018 5:05 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> From: >
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:02:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> *One objective was to convince myself whether
On 6/5/2018 5:05 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:02:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have
written for decoherence makes
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:02:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have
written for decoherence makes any sense. Originally I thought one
neede
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:02:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> *One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have written for
> decoherence makes any sense. Originally I thought one needed mutual
> interference of all components
On 6/5/2018 8:12 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On 4 June 2018 at 20:30, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 6/4/2018 3:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Most scientists and scientifically-literate people I know assume that
consciousness emerges from brain activity without ever really thinking
about the ramificati
On 6/5/2018 7:58 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
If I understand correctly, you define free-will as the ability to act
independently from other people, biological instincts and so on. My
problem is that free-will must be free from something. I can accept it
as a relative concept -- my free-will in re
On 6/5/2018 7:42 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On 4 June 2018 at 23:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 6/4/2018 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I am very grateful for mother medicine, but
we should not pretend that its operative assumptions solve the
fundamental questions.
What fundamental question do y
On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
*One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have written
for decoherence makes any sense. Originally I thought one needed
mutual interference of all components for it to be viable. I doubted
whether each component interferes with
On 6/5/2018 2:05 AM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
Remember that the analysis I have given above is schema
On 4 June 2018 at 20:30, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/2018 3:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> Most scientists and scientifically-literate people I know assume that
>> consciousness emerges from brain activity without ever really thinking
>> about the ramifications of this hypothesis. I have h
On 4 June 2018 at 17:11, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 3 Jun 2018, at 20:40, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On 2 June 2018 at 17:10, John Clark wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:15 AM, Telmo Menezes
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to see Bruno actually quote some well known philosophers or
>>>
On 4 June 2018 at 23:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/2018 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> I am very grateful for mother medicine, but
> we should not pretend that its operative assumptions solve the
> fundamental questions.
>
> What fundamental question do you refer to? How to detect consc
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 9:05:13 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> From: >
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> From:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> From:
>>>
>>>
>>> Remember that the analysis I have given above is schemati
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
Remember that the analysis I have given above is schematic,
representing the general progres
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> From: >
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> From:
>>
>>
>> Remember that the analysis I have given above is schematic, representing
>> the general progression of unitary evolution. It is not specific
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
Remember that the analysis I have given above is schematic,
representing the general progression of unitary evolution. It is
not specific to any particular case, or any partic
16 matches
Mail list logo