On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 4:02 PM Stathis Papaioannou
wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 14:14, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 2:08 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Bruce Kellett
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:32 PM Stathis
*You could have omitted your snotty second sentence. Why is it OK for you
to use the List to mentally jerk off about the applicability of Born's rule
in the context of an interpretation you know is false, the MWI, than not
for me to ask a question which might have a simple answer, or path to
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 14:14, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 2:08 PM Stathis Papaioannou
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Bruce Kellett
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:32 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 09:02, Bruce
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 2:08 PM Stathis Papaioannou
wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:32 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 09:02, Bruce Kellett
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:29 PM Stathis
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:32 PM Stathis Papaioannou
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 09:02, Bruce Kellett
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:29 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 22:17, Bruce
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:32 PM Stathis Papaioannou
wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 09:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:29 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 22:17, Bruce Kellett
>>> wrote:
>>>
It can be a metaphysical truth
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 09:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:29 PM Stathis Papaioannou
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 22:17, Bruce Kellett
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> It can be a metaphysical truth without there being any dualist
>>> underpinnings. The problem, as you point
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:29 PM Stathis Papaioannou
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 22:17, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
>>
>> It can be a metaphysical truth without there being any dualist
>> underpinnings. The problem, as you point out, is when there are multiple
>> copies of you extant at a single
On 12/25/2020 3:17 AM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 9:41 PM Stathis Papaioannou
mailto:stath...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 21:32, Bruce Kellett mailto:bhkellet...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 6:27 PM Stathis Papaioannou
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:55 AM wrote:
*> There are three possible ways out this problem of course. One is to say
> these string must be finite and thus the set of them enumerable. The other
> is to abandon the axiom of choice which permits the ordering I mention
> above. The third would be to
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:37 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
* >That the Born rule doesn't derive from the Schroedinger equation doesn't
> bother me. *
>
We don't need to derive the Born Rule from the Schroedinger equation or
from anything else
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 22:17, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 9:41 PM Stathis Papaioannou
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 21:32, Bruce Kellett
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 6:27 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 12:29, Bruce
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 9:41 PM Stathis Papaioannou
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 21:32, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 6:27 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 12:29, Bruce Kellett
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 12:13 PM Stathis
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 21:32, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 6:27 PM Stathis Papaioannou
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 12:29, Bruce Kellett
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 12:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>>> wrote:
>>>
One is the probability that a
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 6:27 PM Stathis Papaioannou
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 12:29, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 12:13 PM Stathis Papaioannou
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> One is the probability that a certain branch exists, the other is the
>>> subjective probability that a
*FY interest and information, the two prior links you supplied are within
my pay grade and have high priority on my reading to-do list. The same
hopefully applies to your links below. Also, of course, I will be studying
the no-go theorems suggested by Bruce. TY, AG*
On Friday, December 25,
*In fact, if you could set your arrogance and ego aside for a moment, you'd
see that I am raising a serious issue, albeit INDIRECTLY. Even if no FTL
signaling is possible in QM according to the no-signaling theorems (and
thereby saving relativity), this is "guaranteed" by assuming "intrinsic
17 matches
Mail list logo
