Brent Meeker wrote:
Actually it collapses before, see quant-ph/0402146 v1. It is shown that
in a Young's slit experiment with C70 buckyballs, the interference
fringes disappear when the buckyballs are sufficiently heated to radiate
some IR photons. No observer is needed, only the
On Jan 3, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
Is hurting or make the puppet suffer morally correct with your position ?
If it is not, then this is strange since they are only puppets and you
*are*...(means you can't hurt them because they aren't) This is simply
sollipsism and (un)fortunately
of true reality, and applies much more
effectively to cosmology, the study of the whole.
Gevin Giorbran
http://everythingforever.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post
On Jan 6, 12:54 pm, Hal Ruhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My view has been that the Nothing is incomplete because it contains
no ability to answer meaningful questions about itself and there is
one it must answer and that is its duration. This question is always
asked and must be answered. To
Hey Günther, thanks for the comments.
On Jan 9, 6:43 am, Günther Greindl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm - your real existing nothing is just a word without referent - like
a null pointer.
Q: What is on the paper?
As answer you expect that what is written.
As the paper is still blank:
A:
5 matches
Mail list logo
