Re: “Markov's theorem

On 20 May 2012, at 19:03, Stephen P. King wrote: On 5/20/2012 9:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Stephen, I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do not quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the world that surround me. Dear Evgenii, I am just a

Re: “Markov's theorem

On 5/20/2012 9:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Stephen, I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do not quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the world that surround me. Dear Evgenii, I am just a person with insatiable curiosity and the strange ab

Re: “Markov's theorem

Stephen, I have a more general question. I am not a mathematician and I do not quite understand the relationship between mathematics and the world that surround me. It seems to me that your writing implies that there is the intimate connections between mathematics and the Universe. Could you

Re: “Markov's theorem

2012/5/20 Stephen P. King > On 5/20/2012 12:24 AM, Russell Standish wrote: > >> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote: >> >>> Dear Bruno, >>> >>> I finally found a good and accessible paper>> url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&**source=web&cd=1&sqi=

Re: “Markov's theorem

On 5/20/2012 12:24 AM, Russell Standish wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote: Dear Bruno, I finally found a good and accessible paper

Re: “Markov's theorem

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote: > > Dear Bruno, > > I finally found a good and accessible paper >

Re: “Markov's theorem

On 5/19/2012 2:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 19 May 2012, at 19:17, Stephen P. King wrote: On 5/19/2012 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Stephen, I presented an argument. Whatever you read, if it casts a doubt on the validity of the argument, you have to use what you read to find the invalid

Re: “Markov's theorem

On 19 May 2012, at 19:17, Stephen P. King wrote: On 5/19/2012 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Stephen, I presented an argument. Whatever you read, if it casts a doubt on the validity of the argument, you have to use what youread to find the invalid step. If not, you act like so m

Re: “Markov's theorem

On 5/19/2012 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Stephen, I presented an argument. Whatever you read, if it casts a doubt on the validity of the argument, you have to use what you read to find the invalid step. If not, you act like so many papers pretending that cannabis is a dangerous, but which

Re: “Markov's theorem

m&paperid=471&option_lang=eng Markov's theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable combinatorial manifolds M. A. Shtan'ko <http://www.mathnet.ru/php/person.phtml?option_lang=eng&personid=8892> *Abstract:* We prove the theorem of Markov on the existence of

Re: “Markov's theorem

On 5/19/2012 3:02 AM, meekerdb wrote: On 5/18/2012 10:19 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: Hi Bruno and Russell, This is one of the reasons I am skeptical of Bruno's immaterialism: http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=im&paperid=471&option_lang=eng Mar

Re: “Markov's theorem

uno's immaterialism: http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=im&paperid=471&option_lang=eng Markov's theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable combinatorial manifolds M. A. Shtan'ko Abstract: We prove the theorem of Markov on the existence of an

Re: “Markov's theorem

On 5/18/2012 10:19 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: Hi Bruno and Russell, This is one of the reasons I am skeptical of Bruno's immaterialism: http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=im&paperid=471&option_lang=eng Markov's theorem and algorithmi

“Markov's theorem

Hi Bruno and Russell, This is one of the reasons I am skeptical of Bruno's immaterialism: http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=im&paperid=471&option_lang=eng Markov's theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable combinatorial manifolds